Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jim.allen@longhornband.net: 223 ]

Total 223 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [TenTec] Taxes (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 21:16:00 -0500
This is the third time it has gone out. 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00451.html (9,219 bytes)

182. Re: [TenTec] Taxes (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 06:55:52 -0500
To quell speculation that *TenTec* was considering a move. It's all about *TenTec* here, in various ramifications. 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00465.html (9,175 bytes)

183. Re: [TenTec] Re "merger": color me puzzled (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 07:14:27 -0500
Probably the owners of Tentec, one retired, the other just retired as I understand it, are probably not self aggrandizing bozos like the management of banks with shareholders to, if not deceive, at l
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00482.html (11,950 bytes)

184. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:15:34 -0500
I think this discussion, along with the other thread about grounding, illustrates the insecurity many of us experience when told to go read the NEC, or the building code, if that is different. Even t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00493.html (10,805 bytes)

185. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Website Down (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:33:22 -0500
It looks like the website is up but without content, perhaps a distinction without a difference. 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00499.html (7,872 bytes)

186. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Website Down (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 16:10:22 -0500
Updated to show the RF Concepts Companies stuff and "About Our Merger", it looks like. 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00509.html (8,749 bytes)

187. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:55:16 -0500
It's hard to justify getting into that market right now I would think. There is too much experimentation, too much make do with Linksys and other stuff, to know just what direction things will eventu
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00559.html (12,501 bytes)

188. Re: [TenTec] tenTec merger, etc. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 07:54:59 -0500
Follow the money. In many places, the government has money available to buy stuff, radios, antenna, power supplies, computers, goodies, toys, etc., pay for internet hook ups or make available existin
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00576.html (12,323 bytes)

189. Re: [TenTec] tenTec merger, etc. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 08:52:44 -0500
Many of us more mature types will recall that back in the Happy Days of the post war years, there was almost nothing in the way of public radio systems and those that were in use were crude, ineffici
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00580.html (15,964 bytes)

190. Re: [TenTec] The next flagship (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 13:56:42 -0500
That's not too surprising. When a new ham gets his ticket, and heads off to the LRS to get gear, probably at an HRO, or AES and similar, what does he see? All the JA gear. There is nothing else, and
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00591.html (12,243 bytes)

191. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 20:36:04 -0500
I have a 130' dipole with the center at 32', drooping to about 15' at each end. It is fed with a little over 100' of 450 ohm twin lead to an AH-4 Icom autotuner, thence with RG-8X into the shack to t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00640.html (14,324 bytes)

192. [TenTec] Plug confusion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 12:28:24 -0500
I just received an Omni VI+ Thursday afternoon. It came with full complement of filters and the matching speaker power supply. It is very clean, not quite factory new condition. This one even has the
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00647.html (9,480 bytes)

193. Re: [TenTec] Plug confusion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:33:25 -0500
Yes, but no key I have owned or recall seeing has a RCA plug! There are ways around this of course. Figuring out how to adjust and work around these is not the problem. Having to be put to the annoya
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00649.html (12,593 bytes)

194. Re: [TenTec] Plug confusion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 19:02:44 -0500
The brand new fireproof ones I got from MARS back in the late 50's didn't have cables or connectors. I'm on my 3rd Bencher. The last two used ones had cable and 1/4" connectors. The new one I bought
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00656.html (11,958 bytes)

195. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 08:29:31 -0500
What's wrong with having an Omni VII? 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00748.html (8,576 bytes)

196. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 09:12:54 -0500
Ahaaa! I know that feeling. After 55 years of this, I agree..... these knobless radios are a new trick for us old dogs. Let me make a suggestion.... never buy a 706MKIIG, it's a button masher's parad
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00751.html (10,725 bytes)

197. Re: [TenTec] How much for an Orion III? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:54:05 -0500
You mean, maybe there are warehouses full of KWM2s somewhere, like the old ARC-5's? 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00314.html (11,133 bytes)

198. Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter on its Way _ A Few Questions (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:04:46 -0500
Have a look at this: http://www.qrz.com/db/K8NDS?ref=863751574. There is a Yahoo Group as well the link for which is in that webpage. Although some have taken issue with it, builders have reported im
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00448.html (11,039 bytes)

199. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:55:12 -0500
We investment guys like to think of an investment was a speculation that worked out well, while a speculation was an investment that did not. :>) 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00471.html (15,576 bytes)

200. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 08:39:50 -0500
Exactly. What do accountants know about that!! 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00485.html (9,937 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]
This search system is powered by Namazu