Mail Archive Search: <+from:jimr.reid@verizon.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jimr.reid@verizon.net: 541 ]

Total 541 documents matching your query.

301. [TenTec] Guidance on Linear Amplifier Choice (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 12:33:17 -1000; Re: The Henry 3KD Premier desk top amp. A link to the spec page: http://www.radiodan.com/Henry/Amp_specs/premier_info.htm and a link to photos of this 8877 tube amp: http://www.radiodan.com/Henry/Amp; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00159.html (8,295 bytes)
302. [TenTec] what is "quiet"? (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 14:24:27 -1000; Maybe Tom is modest? He didn't link to his much material. Anyway, he has written up a lot of info about rcvr measurements AND his mods to a few rcvrs, including everything done to his "R4C"',; reall; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00164.html (9,541 bytes)
303. [TenTec] Titan 425 Tune Up (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 07:59:56 -1000; Always, high voltage! Lowest IM's that way. And, please during tune up on the bands, use a dummy load. For most linear transfer, and lowest output distortion products, after you reach max power outp; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00247.html (7,126 bytes)
304. [TenTec] Titan 425 Tune Up (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 08:46:00 -1000; Hmmm, that didn't come out just correct, hi. You want to increase the LOAD on the amplifier output, this is done by slightly lowering the value of the load capacitor, decreasing the output power a bi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00250.html (7,039 bytes)
305. [TenTec] Am I alone? (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 08:26:12 -1000; Early every morning, before my computer is on, e-mails are sent to me. This starts around 12:30 AM Hawaii time, or 6:30 AM EDT. These are coming from various amateur radio reflectors. However, a few; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00289.html (7,841 bytes)
306. [TenTec] Am I Alone? (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:02:18 -1000; Ok, thanks for the many responses. The infected host computer for this thing is NOT subscribed to the Ten Tec reflector. I have heard from no one else who has rcvd this particular problem who is on t; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00295.html (6,587 bytes)
307. [TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:59:26 -1000; I find the ARRL lab "Expanded Test Reports", which are ALL data, to be just great! Nothing subjective there. 73, Jim KH7M; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00337.html (7,733 bytes)
308. [TenTec] RX-340 Narrow Roofing Filter (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 11:13:38 -1000; Hi, Someone on this list, a few weeks ago, indicated a search for a more narrow filter for the 45 MHz IF; an option a good deal more narrow than the 20 kHz and 16 kHz units in the present 340 front e; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00350.html (6,920 bytes)
309. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:41:35 -1000; I think I understand that the "internals" of both the BNC and the Type N connectors are the same! That is same pin and conductor size. Is this true? 73, Jim KH7M; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00359.html (9,529 bytes)
310. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:21:31 -1000; Maybe that is why the hobby of amateur astronomy, and deep sky observing with rather large (for amateur use) telescopes has grown so dramatically the last 10 years or so. Just try to obtain a new, l; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00387.html (8,708 bytes)
311. [TenTec] Heil Goldline on the Jupiter? (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:28:45 -1000; Odd, my Goldline Heil, with switch selectable Narrow or Wide band elements, is plugged directly into my Pegasus mike connector. Of course, I have the Heil mike cord for the Ten Tec rigs. Seems to op; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00416.html (7,540 bytes)
312. [TenTec] One Day to Extra Class (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:47:53 -1000; I am shocked at the following report from the ARRL! I am sending this to a fairly wide distribution with this question: is this where Amateur Radio really wants to be going? Or do you think the follo; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00573.html (9,748 bytes)
313. [TenTec] On to the Orion, not One day Extra's (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:13:46 -1000; Pete wrote, in part: Yes, and speaking of which, anyone get any more info about the soon coming Orion? Last info of which I am aware was posted April 8th, see: http://www.qsl.net/w6hk/orion.htm Most; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00621.html (7,574 bytes)
314. [TenTec] CW Dead? Apparently not... (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:07:18 -1000; Maybe because the photos appear more "shiny" than his other J-38 which is only up aroung 30 or so some dollars. Not interested in either myself, hi. 73, Jim KH7M; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00631.html (8,446 bytes)
315. [TenTec] FCC Response, re Extra License (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:21:07 -1000; Today, the following arrived from William Cross at the FCC: "Jim: While I understand that your comments are rhetorical, I can answer the question you pose: Yes, what does the Extra Class license mean; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00665.html (8,723 bytes)
316. [TenTec] Jupiter taking a beating? (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:37:19 -1000; Robert, Your note is a perfect example of a "review" in favor of, that you should just copy and paste into an eham review! 73, Jim KH7M (I use the Pegasus every day out here) good of here; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00719.html (8,979 bytes)
317. [TenTec] IC part types - was Orion prototype (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:05:59 -1000; Stuart wrote, in part: In the RX-340, these are the A/D on boaard 81790, AD7872JN and, D/A, same board, AD7840JN . Evidedntly these part numbers are OEM's just for Ten Tec. Nothing on the Analog Devi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00026.html (7,151 bytes)
318. [TenTec] IC part types - was Orion prototype (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 15:48:35 -1000; Nope, they are "standard" parts. They take in/output IF signals up to 40 kHz or so as input, so they would have no problem with the 16 2/3 kHz IF of the 340. The input A/D is a $34 part; the output,; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00035.html (7,254 bytes)
319. [TenTec] Orion, the direction? (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 18:34:28 -1000; Ok, so the A/D and D/A's in the RX-340 are "only" 14 bit. I am told that until the digital to analog, and reverse, can get up to 18 or 20 bit, no big deal for improvements! Can this happen with the O; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00042.html (7,963 bytes)
320. [TenTec] Orion, the direction? (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 19:13:53 -1000; Yes, and the Ten Tec RX-340 final IF is at 16 2/3 kHz. So, what are the performance advantages of the Kachina and Icom Pro, in the rcvr over the TT RX-340??? Can't find them even in the marketing cl; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00045.html (8,505 bytes)

Current List: 301 - 320
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]