Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jimr.reid@verizon.net: 529 ]

Total 529 documents matching your query.

61. [TenTec] Occupiedd Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:48:12 -1000
Ref, the discussions here about used bandwidth. How about the occupied bandwidth of the "comming" ditital audio signals. Per Doug Smith's web site, a unit is now on the market, a gadget called an ARD
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00410.html (8,917 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Occupied Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:58:33 -1000
Great, the Feb. QST will get out here to Kauai by barge by, at least, the second week of March!!! Could pay for airmail/1st class our here, but that is about double the dues cost. Perhaps the review
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00422.html (8,316 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] FS - Excellent Corsair II (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:11:55 -1000
Mine certainly is crisp also. I can "hear" a light tick sound if I rock the knob after switching, but only a very slight movement of the knob pointer. So little, in fact, never noticed before until
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00934.html (7,740 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] White Paint ? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 07:56:18 -1000
Can't happen here; I leave my keyer plugged into that jack ALL the time, hi. 73, Jim KH7M
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00019.html (7,417 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] ORION Specifications? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:38:19 -1000
Rick wondered: [Between the ARRL measured data on the Elecraft site, and the Ten Tec data at their site.] Yes, there are differences, I believe I have previously read somewhere, in "exactly how" the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00105.html (10,554 bytes)

66. [TenTec] Re: [Orion] Orion Synthesizer speed (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:43:29 -1000
Comment made: I believe that this is "on purpose". As I think I understand, from prior posts on this issue, in exchange for a slower synthesizer, we are given very much lower "close in" phase noise w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00361.html (8,729 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Announcing the N4PY Orion Control Program (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:11:36 -1000
I believe you could, but you would have to have Carl's program loaded twice, with one of the programs using a different COM port from the other. Not sure if this would work for real SO2R contesting,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00370.html (8,194 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] Orion Synthesizer speed (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:46:03 -1000
Bob, 5B4AGN, wrote, in part: Ok, Bob, guess I missed your earlier post. Hope TT can come up with a "replacement" processor then for all these overhead functions. Maybe have to be a board swap with th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00389.html (8,087 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] RE: sterba (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:07:03 -1000
Is THIS a "sort of" sterba: http://www.antenna.be/rhr.html ? 73, Jim KH7M
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00433.html (7,325 bytes)

70. [TenTec] Re: ARRL - Orion review (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:16:20 -1000
Oh wow! What a write up. Have read through one time, now must do it again, hi. They tried it, and they liked it. 73, Jim KH7M
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00015.html (7,257 bytes)

71. [TenTec] Re Orion on Elecraft's Receiver Summary Page (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:34:21 -1000
It was written: Looking at the Elecraft comparisons, occurs to me that the IMPORTANT numbers are superior with the Orion, in particular look at the dramatically better phase noise number for the Orio
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00094.html (10,137 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:11:58 -1000
I thought the Orion Main rcvr did not receive much from outside the amateur bands. Here are the parameters of the ARRL test and the reported data: "Second-Order Intercept Test Description: This test
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00447.html (9,333 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:21:28 -1000
Please pardon the previous incomplete post, same subject from me, this is the one intended: I thought the Orion Main rcvr did not receive much from outside the amateur bands. Here are the parameters
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00448.html (10,084 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:35:33 -1000
More: Is it possible to measure IP2 of the Orion, and for it to have some real meaning.....Yes: The second order IM products occur as f1+and- f2, Or, how about a real measurement of IP2 results; how
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00449.html (9,425 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:52:59 -1000
It seems to me, that the fact that the indicated output power on the test instrument was +63dBm with the preamp both Off and On, further indicates that what ever was being read had NO relation at al
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00450.html (9,627 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:19:51 -1000
The test instrument DOES NOT readout +63 dBm as I wrote above! But some output power well below that number. The IP2 number of +63dBm is an EXTRAPOLATION to the intersection of two straight lines who
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00452.html (10,333 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:58:08 -1000
Nope, not at all! Why, because, as do you, I don't think the IP2 number represents anything of importance to users, unless there is something about the design that IS allowing out of band signals to
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00454.html (11,135 bytes)

78. [TenTec] Re: ORION RF FAULT ISSUES? TT PLEASE READ! (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:36:14 -1000
With obvious worry, it was written: My input on this: I have had my Orion since the middle of last May. Used with a linear DAILY, including the 10 meter CW contest just passed where 1500 watts out we
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00580.html (8,503 bytes)

79. [TenTec] Re: ORION RF FAULT ISSUES? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:02:05 -1000
I should have also said that Rich, K1CC was the guest op here for some of the contest; Rich "ran" pretty constantly on 28020, plus/minus just a little bit. Was going at close to 100 Q's per hour rat
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00584.html (7,962 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] N4PY Orion Control Program Version 1.06 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:09:56 -1000
Carl, Got here just fine, all set up along with TT 1.367. 73, Jim KH7M
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00840.html (8,405 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu