Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jmlowman@sbcglobal.net: 297 ]

Total 297 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TenTec] David Barlow (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:28:42 -0700
I have removed Dave's two addresses from the list, and have expressed condolences privately to Betty. Thanks to all for the heads-up. 73 de Jim - AD6CW
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00380.html (6,936 bytes)

202. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec OMNI VI + looking for a home (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:48:18 -0700
Not me. If I opt for an Omni VII or Orion down the road, the Omni VI stays. 73 de Jim - AD6CW Tod Glenn wrote: Cripes, is everyone selling their Omni VI? I just listed mine yesterday here. -- Tod Gle
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00445.html (8,817 bytes)

203. [TenTec] ADMIN: Re: WTB: TT282 OR INRAD 751 FILTER (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:58:22 -0700
Gang, I do NOT like to see this sort of message posted to the list. Remember that there are two sides to every story. I've seen this happen many times and most often, it was a matter of a misundersta
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00414.html (8,903 bytes)

204. [TenTec] ADMIN: Re: Orion I and II on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:14:43 -0800
Brett, there's no need to leave the list. Too bad that I didn't catch you before you unsubscribed. You did the right thing by apologizing quickly and were a man about it, which I respect. The others
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00598.html (10,090 bytes)

205. Re: [TenTec] Unofficial TT site (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:43:07 -0800
It's there now, guys. There had been a problem at QTH.net and QSL.net for the past couple of days. As far as the status of the site being maintained, I'm not sure. 73 de Jim - AD6CW Hmmmm.... when I
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00937.html (7,273 bytes)

206. Re: [TenTec] Unofficial TenTec Pages (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:51:54 -0800
There is also the W8KC Virtual Ten-Tec Museum at: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/w8kc/tentec.html However, I don't know how long that site will continue, since we lost Paul unexpectedly last year. It
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00938.html (8,092 bytes)

207. Re: [TenTec] Different list for CW comments (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:18:43 -0800 (PST)
In time this, too, shall pass. In fact, I'm surprised that it isn't over by now. However, I would gently remind everyone that policing the list is against the rules; also that you have a delete key.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00436.html (7,294 bytes)

208. [TenTec] [Fwd: Orion II Spot Control] (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:11:58 -0800
I am new to this list and as of today an owner of an Orion II. I seem to be missing something in the manual. Is there any way to adjust the spot volume when using the control to zero beat a cw signal
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00838.html (7,823 bytes)

209. Re: [TenTec] RF Gain mod for ARGO V (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 19:41:00 -0700
Jim, no problem at all. That's the reason that the list is here. Did you contact someone at Ten-Tec, or did you post the question to the list? A couple of folks from T-T are members of the list, and
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00118.html (7,977 bytes)

210. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...." (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:38:20 -0700
Sherman, this message caused further messages from you to be held for moderator approval. Policing the list in any way is against the rules of the list. 73 de Jim - AD6CW Try the Elecraft Reflector.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00253.html (8,596 bytes)

211. [TenTec] ADMIN: "Contrarian" threads (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 20:26:40 -0700
Gentlemen, Keep the discussion civil, or I will end it. Further: policing the list in any way is a violation of the rules. If you're tired of the discussion, don't read the messages! If a discussion
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00100.html (8,745 bytes)

212. Re: [TenTec] Being tired of "On being a contrarian" (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:36:17 -0700
Point of clarification: This is the Ten-Tec list. The Orion and O II are Ten-Tec products. Therefore, discussion of these radios is on topic for the list. 73 de Jim - AD6CW [...] This is the Ten Tec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00158.html (7,877 bytes)

213. Re: [TenTec] My dream Ten Tec rigs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:15:18 -0700
Caity and all, any idea at what point (s/n?) the receiver sensitivity improved? I have a 6N2 and wouldn't part with it. There are so few out there that they are now a sought-after item. I like your s
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00201.html (9,005 bytes)

214. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:44:28 -0700
The requirement to have general-coverage on receive has always puzzled me. Back in the day when I got into ham radio, the best radios were optimized to work on the amateur bands. Yes, I know that not
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00207.html (9,347 bytes)

215. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 20:33:45 -0700
Hi Caity, Grant and all, Hi, Jim, Grant, and everyone else, First, I agree with everything Grant said about why general coverage can be important. Most general coverage transceivers could also be mod
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00247.html (13,250 bytes)

216. [TenTec] ADMIN: Re: Orion II - Tech Topics (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:35:47 -0700
I think Bill has a good point here. Arguing ad infinitum and ad nauseam on the list about actual or perceived shortcomings of the Orions isn't getting us very far. While there are other lists dedicat
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00319.html (10,662 bytes)

217. Re: [TenTec] "End of an Era" (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:31:09 -0700
Isn't this the reason that the Jupiter essentially replaced the Pegasus? And perhaps why the Kachina is no longer in production? Jerry makes a good point. As sort of a tangential example, a few years
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00548.html (9,774 bytes)

218. [TenTec] ADMIN: Please keep the discussion civil (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:27:11 -0700
Gentlemen, While I realize that some of you are frustrated with some aspects of the Orion/O II performance, please keep your comments civil. For those who view these comments as complaining, they are
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00240.html (7,654 bytes)

219. [TenTec] ADMIN: Paul Valko, W8KC - SK (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:55:44 -0700
It is with sadness that I report the passing of Paul Valko, W8KC, a member of this list and host to the Virtual Ten-Tec museum. I received word this morning that Paul had passed this weekend at the y
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00718.html (8,427 bytes)

220. Re: [TenTec] ADMIN: Paul Valko, W8KC - SK (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
No, Ron; sorry. I learned of Paul's passing from one of the members on the QRP-L list. I've been hoping that the same person will post an obit, or more details. 72/73 de Jim - AD6CW
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00736.html (8,303 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]
This search system is powered by Namazu