Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jmlowman@sbcglobal.net: 297 ]

Total 297 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:24:48 -0800
Yes, you certainly will, Bry. Without a doubt, one of the finest transceivers I have ever owned. I traded it to Ten-Tec, along with a Argonaut V, toward the purchase of an Eagle. I don't regret doing
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-12/msg00104.html (8,911 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] 526 V/UHF WTB (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:39:43 -0800
Mike, the 526 is 6m/2m only - no 70 cm coverage. 73 de Jim - AD6CW Thanks and 73 Mike W2IY
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-12/msg00124.html (7,291 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI and 418 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:45:17 -0800
Lee, why not spend a few bucks more and get the Eagle, unless you plan to take the 539/418 pair out of the shack? With the Eagle, you get a better receiver, more filter slots, full 160-6m coverage, a
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-12/msg00210.html (7,506 bytes)

84. [TenTec] ADMIN: If you have been trying to subscribe to the list... (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:27:30 -0700
please contact me. There have been a rash of bogus-looking e-mail addresses looking to subscribe, and I have been deleting them. 73 de Jim - AD6CW List Admin
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-10/msg00157.html (7,350 bytes)

85. [TenTec] ADMIN: Re: Ten-Tec market visibility (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 15:31:13 -0700
This discussion and some of the replies violate at least three rules of the list: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec I would suggest that it cease immediately. Back to things Ten-Tec
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00017.html (10,351 bytes)

86. [TenTec] ADMIN: Re: Coloring the raised black lettering. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:00:41 -0700
Thank you for changing the subject line appropriately. Anything to do with upper-case posting is now off-limits. 73 de Jim - AD6CW Those who prefer a white color might try a paint marker available at
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00033.html (7,720 bytes)

87. [TenTec] ADMIN: "The message's content type was not explicitly allowed" (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:24:06 -0600
Gang, This is a very misleading error message. It is not a comment on the quality of the message. What it really means, is that your message was not composed in plain text. Many e-mail clients defaul
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00047.html (7,291 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:13:00 -0700
I'm inclined to agree with you and Jeff. As far as buying the 539+418, one scenario that I can see is $$$ up front. Assuming that the final price is around $800-900 for each, it may be easier on a li
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00142.html (11,499 bytes)

89. [TenTec] ADMIN: Re: OT: Field Day Drill (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:10:46 -0700
A gentle reminder that there is a rule against policing the list. If you are tired of a topic, delete the message(s), filter them or ignore them, but DO NOT complain about them on the list. 73 de Jim
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00263.html (9,123 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec market visibility (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:50:22 -0700
I think I used the same phrase about a week ago. Interesting that Elecraft can be at both Huntsville and Boxboro, on back-to-back weekends, no less, and Ten-Tec can't venture any farther than Huntsvi
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00324.html (9,583 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec market visibility (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:44:23 -0700
Jerry, I understand that there are almost 1,500 KX3s now out in the field. I ordered mine on January 6th, 10 days after Elecraft opened the order window, and received it on July 19th; more than 180 d
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00329.html (10,302 bytes)

92. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 09:41:42 -0700
Back in the day when the FCC was administering ham radio exams, we had to be able to send at the required speed, as well as copy, and what was provided was a straight key. There may have been an opti
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00068.html (10,043 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:49:53 -0700
Speaking of heavy paddles - yesterday I ordered a P-4 from Jerry, K8RA. This thing is a beast - at 5 lbs, it's about two pounds heavier than my Mercury paddle. You'd have to be a boxer to move this a
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00072.html (10,336 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:24:41 -0700
Aha! Someone finally caught on to the joke! 73 de Jim - AD6CW "Code Worrier"!? Didn't know one had to worry about it :-) Ron K3MIY
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00078.html (8,982 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:51:21 -0700
The topic is fine, Rick. I'm quite liberal with discussion here as long as it relates to Ten-Tec and does not refer to auctions or auction sites. My story: While I have been licensed since 1965, when
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00081.html (11,170 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:05:40 -0700
Kim, I guess now I belong in that same fraternity. I was excited when I had been a ham for 25 years and could join the QCWA. However, I was all of 42 years old. I looked at their periodic publication
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00083.html (10,311 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:02:34 -0700
I have to agree, Rick. While Ten-Tec has an impressive website and has full-page ads in QST and CQ every month, they don't seem to have much of a direct presence. Back when we were putting together a
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00132.html (9,819 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:05:24 -0700
Interesting, Rick. I took the Novice exams back in 1965, when I was in high school. My mentor, halfway down the block (Harry, WA8PVA, SK) administered the exams. In less than a year I traveled to Det
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00134.html (12,960 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec - Marketing (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:50:10 -0700
I meant to add that, while Elecraft also uses the direct-sales model, they are more in the public eye, at least here on the west coast. They have been to the various venues of the ARRL Southwestern D
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00168.html (10,158 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec - Marketing (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 11:05:09 -0700
I also have both Ten-Tec and Elecraft radios, and I agree with you about Elecraft's "cult following." The fact that some amateurs buy strictly on price may have to do with what discretionary income t
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00169.html (8,628 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu