Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:johnclif@ix.netcom.com: 127 ]

Total 127 documents matching your query.

101. [TenTec] Omni VI calibration... (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:15:35 -0700
Greetings, I'm sure that many of you have read the article on frequency calibration in the latest QST. I decided to verify the calibration of my two main rigs (Omni VI, Elecraft K2) to WWV and see ho
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00436.html (9,115 bytes)

102. [TenTec] Jupiter firmware problems & Ten-Tec quality control... (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 14:07:43 -0700
As someone who spent many years designing, developing, and successfully releasing commercial software that has brought in maybe half a billion dollars in revenue while I was there, seems to me the pr
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00463.html (12,664 bytes)

103. [TenTec] Re: Jupiter firmware problems...NOT! (SO!... ) (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:27:06 -0700
[Note: A correspondent informed me that Ten-Tec's firmware is now outsourced to a company called RFSquared... so while I am using "Ten-Tec" in this post, RFSquared should certainly be getting the hea
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00603.html (11,488 bytes)

104. [TenTec] Updating Radios... (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:12:39 -0700
I for one would like to see Ten-Tec go to a subscription base for their software upgrades. Purchasers would get one year of free upgrades, after which they could pay a nominal annual fee ($25 or ther
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00611.html (9,594 bytes)

105. [TenTec] Jupiter versus Paragon... (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:13:55 -0700
I'd like to hear comments from those who have owned both rigs, pros and cons. I know about the PLL problems with the Paragon. How does receiver sensitivity compare to that of the Jupiter? I assume th
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00395.html (7,371 bytes)

106. [TenTec] RE: 60m for Omni VI... (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:13:56 -0700
Seems that this would need some hardware mods/additions... not just firmware mods. I know that the K2 will have to have an additional board added that allows the VFO to tune that band. Isn't the meth
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00396.html (7,461 bytes)

107. [TenTec] RE: TenTec net... (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:13:56 -0700
Is the 14.267 ham on earlier, and actively engaged in a QSO? Then he has the frequency. If this is his favorite frequency, perhaps if we all wrote him and asked him to refrain from QSOs... or join th
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00397.html (8,149 bytes)

108. [TenTec] New 60m band... (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 22:36:35 -0700
Greetings, Just wondering if Ten-Tec is going to make an upgrade path available for those of us who own Omni VIs and VI+s for this new band. Also, will the Orion support this band (perhaps with a sof
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00254.html (7,140 bytes)

109. [TenTec] Pricing... (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 00:52:01 -0700
As a small business owner myself, I understand (and agree with) Ten-Tec's decision to charge as much as the market will bear. How much the market will bear is the question though, isn't it? Re the Ar
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00672.html (9,414 bytes)

110. [TenTec] 302 Remote... will it work w/Omni VI? (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 12:14:44 -0800
The subject sez it all... will the Pegasus/Jupiter remotes work with the Omni VI? If not, can they be modified easily? Thanks, - jgc John Clifford KD7KGX Heathkit HW-9 WARC/HFT-9/HM-9 Elecraft K2 #16
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00128.html (7,110 bytes)

111. [TenTec] Orion feedback... (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 19:13:43 -0800
Based upon the pictures, etc., I think the Orion is going to be a great rig (and I will probably buy one). However... I'd like to see some changes made before the rig is released. First and most impo
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00387.html (10,360 bytes)

112. [TenTec] RE: PBT, extra power (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:28:15 -0800
I'd like to see the Orion have the ability to run an extra clean SSB signal, like the FT-1000 MP Mk V, so that if one is driving an amp via SSB, the cleanest possible signal is being put out. I'd rat
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00724.html (8,518 bytes)

113. [TenTec] RE: Next Filter (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:40:26 -0800
I commonly use both the 500 and 250 Hz filters in the 6 Mhz IF for PSK31 decoding, and find that when combined with PBT they are just the ticket for eliminating interference from strong signals. I al
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00085.html (7,714 bytes)

114. [TenTec] Re: Orion... (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:04:03 -0800
Hello Scott, Thanks for the information. This sounds like a radio that I would be interested in to replace/augment my Omni VI/Opt 1. Some suggestions... please consider changing the entire paradigm o
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00419.html (9,547 bytes)

115. [TenTec] RE: 516... or why the Orion is more exciting (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 20:34:17 -0800
I think it's fair to say that more people will be interested in the Orion versus the new 516 QRP rig. Why? Well... here's why from my point of view. The 516 doesn't excite me because there's nothing
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00452.html (10,093 bytes)

116. [TenTec] RE: 516... or why the Orion is more exciting (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:12:44 -0800
Hello Stuart, I don't think that the Orion is meant to compete with the 516, or vice-versa, and I also don't think that one single customer will be faced with the dilemna of buying one or the other,
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00533.html (11,159 bytes)

117. [TenTec] RE: Info about OMNI VI and VI+ (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 22:19:44 -0800
There were three upgrade paths offered for the original Omni VI: - Option 1 added the VI+ DSP and firmware, and re-assigned front panel keys were provided with stickers to indicate their new function
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00232.html (14,852 bytes)

118. [TenTec] N4PY software... (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:51:25 -0800
Saw the postings and wondered... does this work with the Omni VI as well as the Omni V.9? Thanks, - jgc John Clifford KD7KGX Heathkit HW-9 WARC/HFT-9/HM-9 Elecraft K2 #1678 /KSB2/KIO2/KBT2/KAT2/KNB2/
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-11/msg00081.html (6,911 bytes)

119. [TenTec] Group filter purchase... let's save $$ (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 03:29:30 -0700
Is anyone interested in buying some of the Inrad filters for their Ten-Tec rig? If so, let's get together and make one order to save some money. I want/need three filters, so I'd earn the 5% by mysel
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00016.html (7,920 bytes)

120. [TenTec] Changing the front pushbuttons on an Omni VI (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 21:48:46 -0700
Greetings, I recently obtained some new pushbuttons for my Omni VI front panel to replace the 'upgraded' buttons with the Option 1 upgrade. How do I take the front plate off of an Omni VI to replace
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00100.html (7,168 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu