Mail Archive Search: <+from:johnclif@ix.netcom.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:johnclif@ix.netcom.com: 126 ]

Total 126 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] Old Modes never die... they just get soundcard support! (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Fri Apr 4 14:01:47 2003; Interesting thread about preferability of FSK over AFSK for RTTY... but it leads to a question. One poster moaned that the old modes like CW and RTTY were dying. With the resurgence in popularity of; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00129.html (10,676 bytes)
22. [TenTec] Re: 253 Tuner vs AT-1000 Tuner? (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Tue Apr 15 15:53:43 2003; The new AT-1000 tuner was designed for 1 kw rather than the full gallon to keep costs down while appealing to the largest segment of the amp market (the under-$1k amp purchaser). There are a lot of 5; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00379.html (7,754 bytes)
23. [TenTec] Summary of differences? (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Mon Apr 28 06:45:56 2003; I think the Omni VI/Option 1 is the best bargain of the bunch. You get everything a VI+ has except a 2nd 9Mhz filter slot and TXCO, and you can replace the crystal oven with a TXCO thru Ten-Tec (or y; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00744.html (9,615 bytes)
24. [TenTec] OmniVI Opt3 question (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Sat Mar 15 15:50:15 2003; I have an Omni VI/Opt 1, and the frequency stability has benefited GREATLY from two modifications. The first mod is to replace the crystal oven with the TXCO. This is not a big deal to install, altho; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00610.html (12,600 bytes)
25. [TenTec] Jupiter as a SWL rig... (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Mon Mar 17 22:15:00 2003; I'd like to invite comments on anyone who has (or has had) both a Jupiter and a good SW radio like the Drake R8. How would you owners compare the two for shortwave radio listening and also AM BCB lis; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00710.html (6,713 bytes)
26. [TenTec] filters for digital modes and qrp (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Wed Feb 12 16:45:21 2003; What radio are you using? With my Omni VI/Opt1 I use the 9 Mhz 500 Hz RTTY filter for PSK31 and find I get great results with it. I've written a macro in MixW that centers that signal in the filter p; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00535.html (9,553 bytes)
27. [TenTec] Omni VI filter macros, etc. for MixW v2.0x (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Wed Feb 19 04:57:00 2003; Sure... (to a request that I post some of my macros) Note that I got the idea from something posted by (I believe) George W5YR a while ago... I call this one 'Align'. It moves the selected signal to; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00721.html (9,666 bytes)
28. [TenTec] Omni VI filter macros, etc. for MixW v2.0x (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Wed Feb 19 16:47:00 2003; George had posted a similar macro for his 756 Pro, I just copied the idea and made it work for the Omni VI. For those of you who are running software that doesn't support the Ten-Tec Omni VI (like M; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00736.html (8,716 bytes)
29. [TenTec] TenTec/Vibroplex (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Thu Feb 27 02:09:51 2003; I have thought about buying one of the TT Special Edition paddles but have hesitated. I'm not too worry if the thing needs to be realigned after passing thru the tender ministrations of United Parcel; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg01002.html (12,802 bytes)
30. [TenTec] Interface for Ten-Tec OMNI VI+ (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 14:38:47 -0800; It depends on your software, and it also depends on which data port (RS-232 or C-IV) you want to use. I recommend using the RS-232 port. Regardless of which port you use, even though there are comma; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00029.html (9,011 bytes)
31. [TenTec] Orion vs. Jupiter Audio vs. DSP (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 00:43:45 -0800; 100db of audio differential on a signal that I want to be able to hear thru headphones should be quite enough... don't you think? CD quality sound can be obtained from 16 bits of data. I know we're; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00037.html (9,021 bytes)
32. [TenTec] Jupiter/LDG AT-11MP Tuner (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 04:23:20 -0800; I have one of these tuners that I use with my Omni VI (transmitter is almost identical to Jupiter). It works FB for me, but I never tune at more than 25 watts even though the tuner is rated to 150 wa; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00149.html (10,238 bytes)
33. [TenTec] QRO Creep (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:49:57 -0800; I have seen the same thing happen, to a lesser degree, on other radios. I'm sure it's part of the warming up... transistors are more efficient as they get hotter because internal resistance decreases; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00183.html (6,934 bytes)
34. [TenTec] Amp questions... (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:25:23 -0800; I am the proud owner of a new-to-me Ten-Tec Centaur amplifier... and of course I have no idea how to use it. I thought long and hard before buying an amp, but decided that since the sunspot cycle is; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00326.html (10,709 bytes)
35. [TenTec] Amp questions... (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 01:29:57 -0800; Concerning why the Centaur was discontinued, several people emailed me to tell me that the reason was that Svetlana had discontinued their 811A tube and there was no equivalent that was as well-made; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00390.html (9,571 bytes)
36. [TenTec] Ameritron QSK-5 switch (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Fri Jan 31 16:00:38 2003; I had been considering getting an 811A-based amp (SB200, AL800, etc.) to help on the low bands as the solar cycle decreases... and just for the ability to work some DX that wouldn't come back to my 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00745.html (8,103 bytes)
37. [TenTec] Flamed by the Factory? (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:21:32 -0800; We have a First Amendment... and it covers both parties here. However, although free speech is a protected right, libel isn't. In my opinion, the person who trashed the Argonaut V without ANY persona; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00141.html (11,930 bytes)
38. [TenTec] Zero Beat an Omni VI (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:23:36 -0800; As another poster mentioned, pressing and holding in the CW button will provide the sidetone to the speaker... just zero-beat the received signal to it. Another (more precise) method is to run your f; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00161.html (7,554 bytes)
39. [TenTec] Signal reports on PSK (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:32:05 -0800; There was a letter awhile ago in QST describing a good method for signal reports for PSK, and I use it. The author recommended having the first number the percentage of copy as reflected in 20 percen; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00162.html (7,729 bytes)
40. [TenTec] RE: Ten-Tec 301 Remote tuning knob (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 23:46:52 -0800; Isn't this just a standard Omni V/VI optical encoder in a box? How hard would it be to adapt a 302 to this (obviously the 302's keypad would be unused)? Or, hmmm... a solution that would allow a 302; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00129.html (7,011 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]