Mail Archive Search: <+from:jreid@aloha.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jreid@aloha.net: 104 ]

Total 104 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] First comments: Triton IV Model 544 (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 12:02:26 -1000; Aloha, follow up: Yes, you care so correct, Steve. Anyway, fixing the S-meter position was easy. Evidently it originally was held in place with clear tape. I found just pushing it up, it seemed to st; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00097.html (9,071 bytes)
22. [TenTec] TT s/n and mfg dates? (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 13:53:12 -1000; Hi, Does someone know if TT serial numbers can be used to determine year of manufacture? Wonder what the birthday is for my "new" Triton IV, Model 544, serial number is: 544-753 ? 73, Jim, KH7M -- FA; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00100.html (6,756 bytes)
23. [TenTec] Blown PS 962 (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 20:16:38 -1000; Hi, Need advise on my screw up, probably a blown PS 962 supply. This afternoon, used the Omni VI+ on the Hawaii Afternoon Net. Came back this evening to go to 20 meter CW. Switched the PS and Omni on; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00104.html (10,037 bytes)
24. [TenTec] Blown PS 962 (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 07:14:07 -1000; Aloha, Still early morning here, 7:15 AM. Several sent along comments similar to Dave's: I have the 962 open now, and for the life of me, I cannot locate a fuse on the regulator board, or any where e; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00112.html (8,259 bytes)
25. [TenTec] PS 962 Fusing + Triton Comments (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:29:12 -1000; Hi again, Evidently the 962, with only two internal boards, differs in the lack of the 25 amp pass transistors fuse which is in the 961 in which there is a third board just for the pass transistors.; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00120.html (11,597 bytes)
26. [TenTec] Some Rig Comparisons (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1999 14:37:50 -1000; Hi all, Not sure I should have done this. I fixed up an Alpha/Delta four way coax switch from my C4 beam on the way to my rigs. Now I can immediately compare the "sound" of three rigs: the Omni VI+,; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00220.html (9,584 bytes)
27. [TenTec] Bands (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 11:17:08 -1000; Barry, Maybe this one would help, pretty comprehensive set of info: http://dx.qsl.net/propagation/ 73, Jim, KH7M -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00347.html (7,505 bytes)
28. [TenTec] Dead List? (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 15:45:58 -1000; Aloha Steve, I think it is a little like the bands: it's the week or 10 days before Labor Day, and the "end of Summer", hi. So everyone is somewhere else. Hope TT guys fix my power supply that they; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00352.html (8,070 bytes)
29. [TenTec] Dead List? (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:22:20 -1000; Aloha Bernie, The supply was returned today by UPS, hooray. Per the invoice enclosed they replaced the bridge rectifier and the fuse, which, of course was blown when I returned it. The fuse constant; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00371.html (8,875 bytes)
30. [TenTec] Omni VI+ and new INRAD SSB Filters (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 12:42:27 -1000; Hi, To all who wondered what the results of my new IF filter plans might be (as posted a couple days ago), follows a status report of first impressions: The new, at least to me, INRAD 2.8 and 2.4 10; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00040.html (9,804 bytes)
31. [TenTec] INRAD 2.4khz 10 Pole Filter (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 14:11:19 -1000; I just tried Barry's suggested test. Result: No problem here, hooray! But, wait, just realized my set up is different, or at least Barry's is different from what I thought George at INRAD had in mind; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00049.html (9,546 bytes)
32. [TenTec] INRAD 2.4khz 10 Pole Filter (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 14:54:40 -1000; Hi Ten Tec gang, Thanks for all your comments and mail regarding my now "extra" Omni IF filters. Yes, I now have six of them in the drawer!! But, will hang onto them for awhile until I have a chance; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00051.html (8,413 bytes)
33. [TenTec] AGC: ON or OFF Survey (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 08:04:52 -1000; Hi, How many of you, when on CW, run the "old" way: Turn the AGC OFF, with the RF gain backed off, and with the audio turned full up. That's the way we did it in the old days using the tube rigs. You; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00058.html (8,051 bytes)
34. [TenTec] Results so far: AGC: ON or OFF Survey (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 11:45:12 -1000; Ok, thanks to the dozen who have responded. Results: Leave AGC on Fast all the time: 8 out of 12 Always leave AGC OFF, use "old" way: 3 No response to AGC question: 1 Do use RF gain to adjust signal; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00066.html (9,515 bytes)
35. [TenTec] Fw: [CW] RF gain... (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 15:57:30 -1000; Thought these points should be seen be Ten Tec CW operators, 73, Jim, KH7M: If voltage quieter -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00073.html (8,218 bytes)
36. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:28:15 -1000; Lee wrote, in part: At Dayton, 1994, I bought a new radio: called the Soft Wave. Very similar to the new Pegasus, except it was supposed to be able to print out CW, read the quality of the senders fi; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00192.html (10,346 bytes)
37. [TenTec] Omni VI plus - noise & INRAD filters (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 14:23:07 -1000; Aloha, If you read to near the bottom of this long post you will find: "Bottom line: the performance of the Omni VI+, on our quietest HF band, 10 meters, is NOT being limited, nor compromised by nois; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00277.html (14,022 bytes)
38. [TenTec] Re: (Jim) OMNI-6+ Stuff (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 07:11:41 -1000; Not on a control separate from the DSP NR button, seems to be on the same control. Not sure how it is done, but with the NR ON, CW notes certainly do "peak up"; also notice the same on SSB audio. Ma; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00303.html (7,306 bytes)
39. [TenTec] Omni VI plus - noise & INRAD filters (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:13:54 -1000; Aloha Yuri, You wrote, in part: Yes, Yuri, I do get the noise, whether the antenna input terminal to the Omni VI+ is left "open" or terminated in 50 ohms. BTW, the S-meter reads zero deflection. And,; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00307.html (10,203 bytes)
40. [TenTec] Triton IV vers Corsair II (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 13:08:31 -1000; the addition of bells and whistles....... OK, so does anyone have a Triton IV in nice shape he would like to sell?? Seriously interested! Will put it beside my Omni VI+ and see how they compare. 73,; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00375.html (7,883 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]