Mail Archive Search: <+from:jrhallas@optonline.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jrhallas@optonline.net: 117 ]

Total 117 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] [Fwd: RE: [Fwd: Orion Hardware NB bug from N6BV]] (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:48:49 -0500; Bill/Joel: Yep, 1.372. Is there a later version that I don't have? (I'm not one of the beta testers.) I forgot to mention that it was on 40 meters that I had to insert all that front-end attenuation; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00401.html (8,544 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II/Centaur question (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:13:58 -0500; I have one working just fine with my Paragon I. The QSK keying loop works just as it should. I would expect the II to operate just the dame way. 73, Joel, W1ZR _______________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00497.html (7,111 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Orion II S meter (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:22:01 -0500; Ken, I agree with your statements, but would like to point out that it doesn't have to be that way. If you borrow a top quality calibrated signal generator, or spring for one of the Elecraft receiver; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00849.html (9,022 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 - S meter (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:08:53 -0500; Ken, See the single band XG-1 ($39), or the multiband XG-2 ($59) kits at http://www.elecraft.com/. They provide a 50 uV signal for S9 ref and a 1 uV to make sure you can hear weak ones. Accurate and; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00859.html (8,189 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Thanks ARRL! (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:23:14 -0500; Bill, Thanks very much! I'm also looking forward to seeing our Orion II! It's been on order since July, and I expect it will show soon. That means it will be a while before you see it in QST, but it'; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00881.html (8,045 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 13:55:33 -0500; It is common indeed. An HF over-the-horizon (OTH) radar guy would call it "backscatter" and that is exactly what the Russian (or I should say Soviet, I guess) "woodpecker" HF signals of the 70s and 8; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00056.html (10,743 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] re Orion II curiosity (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:02:08 -0500; Rob, Well put on all points! One other thought would be that a test into a good, solidly connected, dummy load should eliminate RF as an issue and verify proper operation under even more ideal condit; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00333.html (11,328 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Anyone set up two Omni 6's to work split? (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:27:14 -0500; Tim, I've thought about the very same configuration (for about half an Orion), and would think it would be an appropriate topic for the group. If you get any interesting replies, I'd appreciate a cop; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00339.html (7,728 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V Audio (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:57:01 -0500; Stuart, I certainly agree with you, all except for the words "optimum" and "proved". I have this vision that the Bell Labs folk who defined those limits were male folk with more grey hair than I have; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00428.html (8,553 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Questions (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:06:28 -0500; I used a 10D for some time, but found that I had a problem with hum apparently induced from the transformer in the TT ps directly to the coils of the dynamic mic! If I moved the power supply about 5; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00514.html (10,445 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] What makes the 238 good or any other tuner good? (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:16:36 -0500; Well, I agree with Walt on this, except there is also a (usually small) loss in the tuner. If you run Dean Straw's (N6BV, ARRL Antenna Book Editor) excellent TLW, one of the s/w packages that comes w; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00663.html (23,180 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Loop/open wire/AH3? (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:54:23 -0500; Bill, Two observations: 1. The AH-3 tuner is intended to feed a single wire antenna. It will also feed your configuration but (based on my experience with the comparable SGC tuners) there will be imp; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00034.html (9,105 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:21:04 -0500; I don't necessarily recommend "two-coax balanced line", although in fact I do use a short piece going through a wall (yes. feedthroughs are a good sol'n, too) for one end of my rhombic (QST, Nov 2004; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00061.html (13,810 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:37:48 -0500; If you use the coax as coax, all the fields are within the coax so relative spacing between them doesn't matter. I tied the shields together on both ends of the run so the signal will divide properly; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00062.html (13,510 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] Paragon mic (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:18:19 -0500; Larry, I have used a number of mics with my Paragon over the years, including the TT hand mic, a TT 705 kit that I built, an Astatic 10D and who knows what else. I had a problem with hum pickup into; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00484.html (9,110 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] QST AD (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:12:55 -0500; Well, expanded reviews do give you a lot of good data. OTOH, the intent of the QST review is to balance it with subjective assessment of how it "feels" to run the radio. Great numbers are fine, but t; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00997.html (8,709 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:59:40 -0500; Am I missing something here? If a DSB AM signal is tuned with the carrier centered in a 6 kHz BW, I would expect to see just 3 kHz of audio BW. If you tune the carrier to one edge, you will be able t; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00783.html (8,962 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:40:00 -0500; Well, this is all very good info and suggests that the Orion sub-receiver is not really all that useful as a GC SW or BC receiver, if you really want to listen. I've made the case to a few folk in th; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00806.html (11,118 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] RF Getting back into Rig Problem (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 08:51:29 -0500; Dave, It certainly sounds like RF getting into the radio! Sometimes good grounding helps, but it is often even more important to find out how the RF is getting there and stop it from doing so. The po; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00941.html (9,884 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Corsair Questions (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:23:36 -0500; The reason I got rid of my Corsair (perhaps was that I found the RIT range insufficient for serious DX "split" operation. I spent a lot of time unsuccessfully looking for the extra VFO and finally tr; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01166.html (12,335 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]