Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jrhallas@optonline.net: 117 ]

Total 117 documents matching your query.

61. [TenTec] Paragon Problem -spurs on either side of carrier (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:18:20 -0500
Folks, I seem to have a new problem with my Paragon. It transmits spurs 600 Hz above and below the carrier about 10 to 20 dB down from the carrier. This was reported to me by someone using the spectr
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00879.html (8,534 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Problem -spurs on either side of carrier (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:05:39 -0500
This happens in Tune or CW. I can't generate a pure enough sinewave to measure in SSB, but will next week. I took some data on receive this morning and the spurs are down at least 40 dB on receive. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00884.html (10,030 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Problem -spurs on either side of carrier (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:22:10 -0500
Mike, Well, I went to measure, just to be sure, and everything was as expected - voltage wise. What surprised me was that the problem has now gone away. I would attribute it to contact resistance bei
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00902.html (11,515 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 HW Noise Blanker (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:26:12 -0500
Jerry, That not quite what Toby's talking about. The old noise blankers used a noise sample in a wideband receiver to perform a short (not extended by selective filters) duration receive mute, much l
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00926.html (10,662 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 10:09:10 -0500
Well folks, I've been biting my tounge (fingers?) for days but can't stand it any more! I must remark in support of Carter's comment. In terms of the folks who run the ARRL, I can say that they are d
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00350.html (11,220 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] CW needs its own list (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:50:12 -0500
Perhaps we first need a list to discuss the merits of having a separate list for CW? 73, Joel, W1ZR May I please suggest a separate list be established to discuss CW matters? I don't mean to denigrat
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00412.html (8,979 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Balkanization of TenTec (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:20:38 -0500
Well, I have owned a number of Ten Tec radios, used more and may own even more, depending on what I read here, so I like the choice. If they get divided up I would sign up for most, and then someone
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00577.html (10,684 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] Orion II question (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:46:02 -0500
John, I think I remember that the split audio is only available out the front headphone jack? If so, it would probably take a small stereo amp and then you'd be in biz. GL & 73, Joel Joel R. Hallas,
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00828.html (8,140 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] ICOM Pro III and Ten-Tec Titan III (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:30:20 -0500
Interesting question. I've wondered about this for a while and had an opportunity to try my Centaur amplifier with a FT-2000 (in place of my usual Paragon) in full QSK mode this weekend. What I did w
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-11/msg00287.html (8,637 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] Attn vs RF Gain (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:45:47 -0400
Crit, It depends on the level. As I remember from my Corsair days, the attenuator is between the antenna and RF amplifier. If the RF amplifier input is being overdriven, it will still be if the gain
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00073.html (8,503 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] My rare Ten Tec microphone (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:37:27 -0400
As with the postage stamps, Ten Tec will probably issue all future with the printing that you have and offer to replace your "defective" microphone element <g>! Together with my excellent O2 I purcha
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00636.html (9,827 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] AM, was "Just noticed ..." (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:51:13 -0400
The classic SSB-AM signal was that generated in the Collins KWS-1 of 1956. I agree, it's not exactly a transceiver, but another example of that kind of signal. If received in a receiver with 3 kHz fi
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00194.html (12,267 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] AM, was "Just noticed ..." (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:58:23 -0400
Actually I meant "classic equipment." I'm not sure I ever heard a KWS-1 in "AM" mode. The classic SSB-AM signal was that generated in the Collins KWS-1 of 1956. You mean a "classically inferior" AM s
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00202.html (9,100 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] AM, was "Just noticed ..." (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:06:17 -0400
Ken, I guess it depends on what you assume about the way the signal power is generated. You assume that the sideband power will be twice as high as the power in each sideband of a DSB-AM signal. I as
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00203.html (13,421 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] re Scout...the VW bug (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:51:50 -0400
Hey, they're nothing compared to the "band modules" for my HRO-60! I might need to add a room on to the house for those puppies! <g> In fact for mobile operation the modules are a lot smaller than th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00607.html (11,235 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] Signal generator recommendations? (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 21:05:21 -0400
Al, While a solid variable signal generator is a great asset, I have a URM-25, but it isn't exactly trouble free or "small footprint", I also have an Elecraft XG-1 "S-meter calibrator. It puts out an
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00304.html (9,206 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:59:40 -0500
Am I missing something here? If a DSB AM signal is tuned with the carrier centered in a 6 kHz BW, I would expect to see just 3 kHz of audio BW. If you tune the carrier to one edge, you will be able t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00785.html (9,597 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:40:00 -0500
Well, this is all very good info and suggests that the Orion sub-receiver is not really all that useful as a GC SW or BC receiver, if you really want to listen. I've made the case to a few folk in th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00808.html (11,903 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] RF Getting back into Rig Problem (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 08:51:29 -0500
Dave, It certainly sounds like RF getting into the radio! Sometimes good grounding helps, but it is often even more important to find out how the RF is getting there and stop it from doing so. The po
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00946.html (11,454 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] Corsair Questions (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:23:36 -0500
The reason I got rid of my Corsair (perhaps was that I found the RIT range insufficient for serious DX "split" operation. I spent a lot of time unsuccessfully looking for the extra VFO and finally tr
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01171.html (12,632 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu