Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jrichards@k8jhr.com: 668 ]

Total 668 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TenTec] OT: Rob Sherwoods full test results for TS-990S (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 01:13:27 -0400
That looks like an DJ audio mixer... == JHR == On 7/9/2013 7:02 PM, denton sprague wrote: popsthird pic down on the left hand side. ________________________________________ __________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00181.html (8,889 bytes)

102. Re: [TenTec] OT: Rob Sherwoods full test results for TS-990S (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 02:06:24 -0400
That is the best darn commentary I have read in 6 months. Perfect. -- K8JHR -- ____________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00185.html (9,397 bytes)

103. Re: [TenTec] Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 02:29:38 -0400
OK... that provides a way sense and measure it. What amount is too much? But, do I really need to buy a specialize meter to determine the matter? Are there no other signs or SYMPTOMS which indicate s
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00186.html (13,157 bytes)

104. Re: [TenTec] Tuner (RF feedback or CM) (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:04:06 -0400
Thank you for providing such a direct answer to the question, Stuart. From your comments in this and other posts, it does not appear to be a problem. -- K8JHR -- On 7/10/2013 4:29 PM, Stuart Rohre wr
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00208.html (10,556 bytes)

105. Re: [TenTec] TT service (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:42:05 -0400
His list is NOT a ranking of performance of the radios. It is only a ranking of close-in DR3 of all of these radios. Oh, my... er... um... are you SURE? ;-) THIS IS WHAT IS OFTEN CALLED A "DISTINCTIO
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00209.html (10,459 bytes)

106. Re: [TenTec] Rob's Test of the new Argonaut VI (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:09:50 -0400
Very cool. Thanks Rick ! I consider it significant TenTec produces 4 of the top 10 radios on the list. (It may actually be 4 of the top 9, because I understand the Hilberling rig is not available for
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00210.html (7,765 bytes)

107. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 Situation (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:22:55 -0400
Its entirely reasonable that some things from that era are not repairable Disappointing but a fact of life. ________________________________________ Well said, CA. I am amazed how long these radios
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00212.html (11,838 bytes)

108. Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 01:06:03 -0400
That is the one I have, along with a simple transmission line choke for good measure. Bob at Balun Designs was really courteous corresponding about the physical surroundings and the actual feed point
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00220.html (10,946 bytes)

109. Re: [TenTec] TT service (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 01:07:42 -0400
Good comment, GH. == K8JHR == On 7/10/2013 10:19 PM, GARY HUBER wrote: In the past it seemed that Rob was comparing the new radios to a convenient standard, i.e. the Sherwood Engineering modified R4-
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00221.html (8,708 bytes)

110. Re: [TenTec] Sherwood rig measurements (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 01:11:51 -0400
Ha ! I can tell you don't play much basketball, JB ! ;-) I PLAY A LOT of basketball, and while I know players like that, I gotta tease you just a bit ... but, frankly, it is almost impossible to TRIP
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00222.html (8,302 bytes)

111. Re: [TenTec] TT service (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:52:58 -0400
On 7/11/2013 2:13 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote: Gary, you are over-simplifying. ... ALL of these things and many more contribute to a radio's performance...The story is complex. Don't place too muc
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00230.html (8,293 bytes)

112. Re: [TenTec] TT service (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:18:08 -0400
Nuts to the lawyer comment. My sordid and embarrassing past has zero to do with my comment - heck, you rarely hesitate to correct me. I can accept your revision, but that is not what you said before.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00232.html (10,115 bytes)

113. Re: [TenTec] TT service (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:23:44 -0400
Yeah... he pays me in BEER ! I'll drink to THAT any time! ;-) -- JHR -- I pay James a retainer fee to help keep my act clean! (-: _____________________________________ . _____________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00233.html (9,085 bytes)

114. Re: [TenTec] TT service (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:28:35 -0400
Just to clarify... Rick and I get along just fine and nothing in the foregoing should be construed as any more than our poking some fun back at each other, while discussing TT equipment. I have learn
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00234.html (8,969 bytes)

115. Re: [TenTec] Rob's Test of the new Argonaut VI (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:52:04 -0400
I WAS JUST SHOWING MY WIFE THE SHERWOOD LIST... My young bride, Susan takes a real interest, and shares the pleasure of owning, the equipment in the shack. While she does not want a license, she does
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00235.html (9,418 bytes)

116. Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:54:12 -0400
-- Yikes! I see the price has gone up considerably since I got one... ! -- K8JHR -- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00236.html (10,618 bytes)

117. Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:40:45 -0400
Bottom line: DX performance seems more attributable to the Propagation gods rather than what flavor of wire antenna is being used. ____________________________________ Funny you should mention this.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00247.html (8,101 bytes)

118. Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:49:57 -0400
Er...um... was the light bulb piece dated April 1 ...? -- K8JHR -- __________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00266.html (10,160 bytes)

119. Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:28:42 -0400
-- Sarcasm Button ON -- Well... I am all corn-fused. Last year, I researched the heck out of OCF antennas, reading many articles, web pages, ARRL Handbook, ARRL Antenna Book, and more. I discussed my
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00293.html (14,555 bytes)

120. Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:40:40 -0400
On 7/12/2013 4:29 PM, Stuart Rohre wrote: To further amplify Rick's comments, an antenna that has gained popularity in USA in recent years, is a 40 odd foot high vertical for 80 and 160m work. One of
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00294.html (10,069 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu