Mail Archive Search: <+from:jrichards@k8jhr.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jrichards@k8jhr.com: 667 ]

Total 667 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [TenTec] SOFTWARE at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:36:48 -0400; I don't see a serious causal relationship here. I doubt anyone selected his competition radio because it works with a particular logger ... instead, I expect they selected their favorite rig, and the; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00627.html (9,713 bytes)
182. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:42:34 -0400; Not so fast, Dick Tracy. The argument clearly cuts both ways. A bit of a dilemma, actually. The list was, undoubtedly, posted to suggest what is a good contest radio. But, if, he and you both suggest; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00637.html (10,737 bytes)
183. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 16:40:25 -0400; 1) The older Flex 5000 and 3000 suffer from what Rob calls the "Field day problem". This is when very strong signals from very close stations cause the front end to collapse. == Maybe the Eagle is t; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00640.html (12,219 bytes)
184. Re: [TenTec] SOFTWARE at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 16:51:24 -0400; That is because you misspelled it... the word is "causal" - as in one thing leads to another. This is an an important concept in litigation and engineering as identifying the cause of a problem or ev; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00641.html (11,461 bytes)
185. Re: [TenTec] SOFTWARE at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:57:25 -0400; _____________________________________________ Great fun, Ron... I own both a MINI Cooper S and BMW Z-4 M Series roadster. We like driving twisty mountain roads in TN, NC, and KY and stopping at bourb; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00651.html (8,766 bytes)
186. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:56:05 -0400; I am confident the Eagle works fine in that demanding setting. I certainly have no beef with the Eagle. I have no doubt you had problems as you say. I am only saying a few isolated cases are insuffic; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00661.html (9,158 bytes)
187. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 00:27:42 -0400; T H E R I G M U S T O N L Y B E G O O D E N O U G H. Nobody says the rig doesn't matter. But the best rig doesn't help win, either. ____________________________________________________ RICK - You can; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00663.html (14,684 bytes)
188. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 01:11:55 -0400; The Eagle has slightly worse IMD than the TS-590 but the Eagle is not noisy. The TS-590 generates broadband noise across the entire HF spectrum. The Eagle does not.> -- Geeze, when you get huffy, it; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00665.html (11,276 bytes)
189. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 01:38:28 -0400; Excellent, Jim. -- JHR -- On 7/25/2014 6:29 PM, Jim Allen wrote: This is like saying that Greg LeMond won the Tour de France because he rode on bikes made by Eddy Merckx. Eddy would like to advertize; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00667.html (9,029 bytes)
190. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:22:19 -0400; OK, I am calling your bluff on this. What data? I asked Rob Sherwood directly about it, and: Sherwood SAID HE HAS NO DATA on broadband noise, and DID NOT TEST for that. Why would I bother with his we; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00682.html (10,434 bytes)
191. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 1225 SWER/Wattmeter linearity (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:43:44 -0400; I get similar results. It was a chore to calibrate for that reason. I suspect most meters have similar issues, however, as they cover a very wide range of frequencies, power ranges, etc. -- JHR -- I; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00686.html (7,902 bytes)
192. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Eagle Problem Part II (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:45:45 -0400; I would re-install the latest firmware, or even an older firmware version. I understand TT service told one feller in Australia to re-install the firmware multiple times to get it properly seated, so; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00687.html (7,874 bytes)
193. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:57:53 -0400; __________________________________________________ AMEN! SIDEBAR: I read this on another reflector AND I JUST BRISTLED when I read it, because it is JUST NOT TRUE. Someone wrote - "Heck -- we can't e; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00689.html (10,544 bytes)
194. Re: [TenTec] SOFTWARE at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:00:29 -0400; Hmmm... lower power = cleaner signal ... Hmmm.... Maybe you overstate your case? A 100 watt rig should be clean through all 100 watts. One should not have to lower power and run an amp to have a clea; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00690.html (10,596 bytes)
195. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:03:58 -0400; Bluff. Dare to Compare these transmitter spectral graphs by the ARRL... https://www.flickr.com/photos/minirichards/14563417790/ These graphs are part of the ARRL 590 and Eagle product reviews, respec; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00694.html (10,485 bytes)
196. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:01:20 -0400; So WHERE is the rest of the #$%$ story you keep talking about? This is all the story I can find! -- JHR -- --; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00698.html (9,751 bytes)
197. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:09:45 -0400; Oops... sorry I thought this was private to Rick... --; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00699.html (9,620 bytes)
198. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 19:58:00 -0400; GREAT - I will give those a look... but so far the Eagle and 590 product review graphs look awfully close to each other, and appear to put both radios in the same category. I examined the graphs Kim; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00721.html (11,447 bytes)
199. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 02:52:57 -0400; This is very important. I asked ARRL Lab Tech Bob Allison about it, and he said the two radios were in the same class noise wise. He said "at 100 kHz from the carrier, both have nearly the same compo; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00730.html (11,322 bytes)
200. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 03:54:16 -0400; The charts on his website are totally misleadding. That's his take. -- Gentlemen - I may be mistaken, and greatly misunderstand all this, but to accuse me of deception or misrepresentation is a low; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00732.html (13,436 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]