Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jrichards@k8jhr.com: 668 ]

Total 668 documents matching your query.

261. Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:20:06 -0400
OK - I thought you might be able to use a longer coax patch cable between balun and rig? Happy trails, OM. Glad to hear you are up and about and able to putz around! -- JHR -- I cant really add much
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00421.html (7,971 bytes)

262. Re: [TenTec] Replace finals in Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:10:59 -0400
Just a thought from one less qualified to comment: My Jupiter was putting out low power, and drawing excessively high current. Lacking the technical expertise to diagnose and fix it, myself, I sent i
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00442.html (8,239 bytes)

263. Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 23:28:23 -0400
Hmmm... Is it possible there are multiple meanings of the word "balun" - some of which are technically correct, while other, more casual uses are used in the vernacular, but not technically correct?
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00016.html (13,378 bytes)

264. Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 08:18:12 +0000
Interesting commentary, Ken. I DO have a 40m ground plan with 65 radials. And it has that textbook 38 ohm low SWR you mention. It seems to work swell... but your comment suggests it could be better.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00068.html (10,210 bytes)

265. Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 03:01:44 +0000
Without tricks, in order to have 38 Ohms on a 160m vertical, it would have to be 132 ft. high and have about 60 radials under it. I doubt that more than 2 or 3 people here have ever had or even used
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00087.html (9,627 bytes)

266. Re: [TenTec] Orion II strange happenings... (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:13:43 -0500
After soldering in the 3 new caps and powering up the rig, VIOLA! Signals everywhere! O II transmits and receives perfectly. I have no idea how this came about...any ideas on cause/effect? __________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00146.html (7,842 bytes)

267. Re: [TenTec] Reflector (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:04:23 -0500
Thank you, Mike. Good summary. Larry -- compare what you are receiving with the group web pages on www.contesting.com, to see if you are missing anything. I think not, but you can quickly determine t
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00186.html (8,411 bytes)

268. Re: [TenTec] 1,327 REASONS* WHY I LOVE MY EAGLE: (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 21:22:51 -0500
I own the TS-590 and am a member of two discussion reflectors about it, and try to keep up on the buzz. I have heard nothing about the Eagle to suggest it has any problems on SSB or with its ALC in c
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00189.html (10,083 bytes)

269. Re: [TenTec] 1,327 REASONS* WHY I LOVE MY EAGLE: (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 03:24:49 -0500
Just wondering what you have been smoking? -- Sheesh... I sure got my models mixed up as Bob K4TAX already pointed out. I cannot imagine how I got it all mixed up !! Nevertheless.... OBJECTION, Your
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00193.html (8,880 bytes)

270. [TenTec] WARNING OFF TOPIC message regarding a backup headset discount (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:24:58 -0500
A lot of guys like the Yamaha CM-500 headset. And for good reasons. In my opinion, the KOSS SB-45 and SB-49 (has inline vol control) at under $40 street price are at least equivalent and we use them
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00004.html (7,873 bytes)

271. Re: [TenTec] TenTec XR320D (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 17:01:01 -0500
Sent to you by private message... with some other goodies. Happy days. --K8JHR -- _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00009.html (7,784 bytes)

272. Re: [TenTec] TenTec XR320D (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 17:23:36 -0500
I tried to send you the program... but your email account rejected it because it had an attachment that is a executable program l (i.e., it has a .exe extension) Your move! I can mail you a disc if y
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00010.html (8,176 bytes)

273. Re: [TenTec] Transmit not stopping when PTT is released (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:57:01 -0500
Golly, Rod... I am no expert... but I will take a stab at it. Are you sure you have the amp cable routed correctly? My "intuition" (i.e. my gut) says you might consider routing the amp key line from
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00014.html (8,995 bytes)

274. Re: [TenTec] Transmit not stopping when PTT is released (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 20:05:23 -0500
I am assuming he is not running it QSK... not with a single amp key line. Or am I corn-fused...? -- K8JHR -- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00019.html (9,248 bytes)

275. Re: [TenTec] RX-320D Replacement? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:16:09 -0500
I bet not. I predict a new major transceiver - possibly two - before they release another receiver. Just my take... after 40 years as an SWL before hamming it up. Happy days. -- K8JHR -- On 12/7/2013
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00064.html (7,408 bytes)

276. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 01:44:56 -0500
..., they weight in at some 135 lbs. ... ...and one won't need to worry about the desk moving around when sending aggressive CW. _______________________________________________ I would hope not! :-0
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00065.html (8,377 bytes)

277. Re: [TenTec] which power supplystation efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:54:22 -0500
Er... um... on the advice of Gary and Paul at TenTec, and from the Brand-X Service Dept, I eliminated the power distribution panel, and shortened all my power supply leads, and connect them directly
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00080.html (12,282 bytes)

278. Re: [TenTec] which power supplystation efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:25:38 -0500
Yes, a fuse is a good idea. I presumed the use of an inline fuse, and did not specifically mention it. Paul C made no comment on the use of a fuse, as I presume he also presumed the presence of a fus
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00087.html (10,595 bytes)

279. Re: [TenTec] Yamaha CM500 headset and Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 05:37:52 -0500
I use the circuit that is discussed and pictured with schematic on page 67 of the November QST. The mic capsule should be (that is I am guessing from experience with these things) capable of taking s
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00107.html (9,376 bytes)

280. Re: [TenTec] Yamaha CM500 headset...Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 06:24:45 -0500
Ok, am confused about CM500. I got one about 3 years ago and there was no 'battery box'. I simply plugged it into the back of my K3 and it works great. Has there been a change to what is shipped now?
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00108.html (8,986 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu