Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jrichards@k8jhr.com: 667 ]

Total 667 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II UV EPROM failure (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:44:03 -0500
Obviously it would be cheaper and easier to find someone who knows what they are doing already, and has all the equipment. -- Truer words have never been spoken... ... but where would ham radio be to
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00177.html (9,282 bytes)

342. Re: [TenTec] Argonauts (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 01:11:44 -0500
I understand that sort of thrill. When I was a very new ham, myself, I contacted a guy operating portable with a very low temporary 20 meter antenna in DEATH VALLEY, and he worked me here in Michigan
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00182.html (8,915 bytes)

343. Re: [TenTec] Argonauts (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:36:41 -0500
Nice going Karl - speaks volumes in favor of adding better antennas and careful station design, before adding a linear! -- K8JHR -- -
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00184.html (7,797 bytes)

344. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:42:15 -0500
Speaking of old guys with old gear... I am Net Control of a Brand X Owner's Net, but we don't care who joins in, or what rig they use, it is all the merrier, and last week, a ham from Kansas City joi
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00264.html (11,025 bytes)

345. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 03:48:36 -0500
If I had buddies who got annoyed with me being 20 or 30 Hz off frequency, I'd look for some new buddies. -- I don't think he said the other guys complained... just that HE was the offending party in
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00267.html (11,198 bytes)

346. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 03:31:33 -0500
INTERESTING PRESENTATION, I can relate to this one. That's when we cringe at the ball park because the singer can't make it to Rocket's Red Glare -- painfully flat. Sorry... that is ME on all singin
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00279.html (10,393 bytes)

347. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:40:37 -0500
Well said, Bob. Last summer, on a Brand X discussion forum, we discussed what is the "best" microphone and what is the best EQ setting. I suggested that, because we only use +/- 2700 Hz audio and RF
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00307.html (12,974 bytes)

348. [TenTec] For Sale - Model 715 (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:39:03 -0500
For Sale - one (1) Model 715 speech processor with cable for TT radios (I think it works with Yaesu rigs, also) in as new condition as used stuff gets, rarely used - rarely even plugged in actually -
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00387.html (7,102 bytes)

349. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 04:09:11 -0500
Well we almost agree 100% -- the only point of departure, is that throwing more money at MY problems would go a very long way to solving them !! ;-) I really agree about the importance of good mic te
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00388.html (11,530 bytes)

350. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 05:05:15 -0500
Hi Pete - sorry, I am not Doug... but you ask about building microphones... and one can, and I have, done practically what you ask about re-purposing electret capsules, and similar things. I have con
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00389.html (12,583 bytes)

351. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with Ten Tecrigs (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 05:05:22 -0500
My experience using the Omni VII on AM parallels Bob's story. I have used the Omni VII to check into a long standing group of AM hams who mostly live in and around Chicago, and they say my Omni VII s
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00390.html (12,317 bytes)

352. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:09:08 -0500
The guys in the contest group I sometimes operate with prefer the Omni VII to the Omni VII - they can use either, but the Omni VI now only gets worked on multi multi contests. So... I guess at least
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00391.html (11,843 bytes)

353. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:17:08 -0500
Hmmm... can I buy a PT-8000 ? If not, then I think it should not count. N'est ce pas? It does not seem a valid comparison to mention stuff that is still on the drawing board. Can I actually buy a PT-
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00392.html (12,046 bytes)

354. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with TenTec rigs (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:31:22 -0500
I see where even on the new and highly touted TS-590 you do some serious button pushing too. I have a TS-590 and the Omni VII in my shack. I like both radios, but I prefer operating the Omni VII. It
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00393.html (13,080 bytes)

355. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:02:51 -0500
Thanks Rick... having just viewed Sherwood's Dayton presentation again, I was not aware they were in production again. You are, of course, quite correct $17,000 or more for a transceiver just ain't w
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00419.html (14,028 bytes)

356. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:21:58 -0500
It is even easier. The Orion has multiple menus broken up on logical groupings and has many more features, settings, and controls to futz with. The Omni VI has something like 45 +/- items in a single
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00420.html (14,443 bytes)

357. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with Ten Tecrigs (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:37:50 -0500
I have also had a lot of help from Rick DJ0IP and Jim Brown N9YC and many others on the list, like Barry, Stuart, and Dr Gerry who does not come by any more, and a host of others too many to list. Yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00421.html (10,855 bytes)

358. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with TenTec rigs (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:56:21 -0500
-- A couple of reasons come to my mind. One is size and weight. A lot of guys like smaller and lighter radios for traveling to far away locations. It costs serious folding money to ship big heavy stu
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00422.html (13,509 bytes)

359. Re: [TenTec] Recording audio from Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:46:58 -0500
Easy... just turn the mic monitor on so that what you speak plays through the headphones, and also so does the receiver, and then run it to a line-input (not microphone input) on your computer sound
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00432.html (8,628 bytes)

360. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with TenTec rigs (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:40:51 -0500
I know a bunch of hams who went to Christmas Island with a pile of K3s, and they enjoyed the fresh sea breeze so much ... they left the windows open instead of closing the windows and using air condi
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00436.html (12,194 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu