Mail Archive Search: <+from:jrichards@k8jhr.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jrichards@k8jhr.com: 668 ]

Total 668 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII Panadapter (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 00:12:49 -0400; Yes, I am. Thanks for the uptake. I long ago moved on and have neither expectation nor desire concerning a continuous Omni VII spectrum scope. No bitterness or negative outlook about it or TT - I jus; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00140.html (10,227 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 22:09:23 -0400; Let's see, what have we learned from this? "Radios with a 2nd RX using upward conversion won't work as well on the ham bands as receivers using downward conversion!" Er... um... Not necessarily. That; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00148.html (10,887 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 22:12:10 -0400; ________________________________________________ Yeah... Barry, did you get an opportunity to make any comparisons between the two on any ham bands? From the brief description of your test, it appear; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00149.html (8,691 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 22:31:15 -0400; Thanks for doing the test. Sounds like John Henry was right in not classifying the RX366 as general coverage. That is not how I read Mr. Henry's comment. I believe he said, "Some very astute ears wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00159.html (9,745 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 22:58:25 -0400; Fundamentally it gets down to a couple of things, like which side of the pond do you live on, and if you care whether you might be the 5th guy or 155th guy to work a DX station. Phooey. If you can h; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00160.html (9,471 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 08:37:17 -0400; YOU said the differences between the two receivers would mean the difference between the 5th guy to work the DX, or the 155th guy to work him. So, if I can work him on both radios, then I can hear hi; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00163.html (12,483 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 08:53:53 -0400; OK... Shoot. No offense... but I was banking on what John Henry said. ;-) I am forever picking the wrong candidate... ;-) Thanks for the clarification, OM. -- K8JHR -- _______________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00165.html (9,303 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 21:29:09 -0400; That works for me, Ray. Thanks. -- K8JHR -- Since I started this thread a few days ago, let me try to summarize where we are. _______________________________________________________ .. ______________; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00181.html (8,160 bytes)
49. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 22:44:34 -0400; "The average ham, such as myself, will rarely, if ever, find himself surrounded by 30+ dB over S9 signals even during contests." I apologize for colossal ignorance and misunderstanding of what is mea; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00185.html (10,229 bytes)
50. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 23:15:12 -0400; I agree completely. Such forthright revelation is extremely rare. I am not dissing TT in any way. I understand manufacturers face all sorts of technical and logistical setbacks producing technologica; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00186.html (8,886 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 14:55:03 -0400; I have no idea if this would even happen in the states. _________________________________________________ Yes, but from a slightly different source. Some HF receivers in some locations have problems; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00199.html (13,278 bytes)
52. Re: [TenTec] ten tec 301 tuning pod (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 12:49:08 -0400; Is a 301J different from a 301 pod? My Jupiter manual says the 301J and 302 are the same except for the color of the case. But I don't know if there is a 301J and a 301 which are different. -- K8JHR; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00212.html (7,799 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] 301 302 romote tuning pod (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 18:50:52 -0400; Thanks, Terry. -- K8JHR -- The 302 came in different... -- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tente; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00214.html (7,059 bytes)
54. Re: [TenTec] Need covers (or totally dead) TT 1210 transverter (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:31:28 -0400; Have you compared its dimensions with any of Ten-Tec's metal project boxes? Just a wild thought, perhaps you could fashion a top cover from one of the TT project boxes. I used one of them to fix anot; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00018.html (7,888 bytes)
55. Re: [TenTec] dial lights for OMNI D and Model 544 Triton (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:42:00 -0400; I like the 12 v LEDs that do not need a resistor. All over eBay cheap... or in the catalog at www.allelectronics.com -- JHR -- How do you determine the proper resistance? ____________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00036.html (8,120 bytes)
56. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Information Request (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:43:52 -0400; I bought a Jupiter a bet and just got it back from a full checkup, weekend spa treatment, and brain transplant (new chipset) from TT HQ. I cannot wait to try it out. -- K8JHR -- -- __________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00037.html (8,258 bytes)
57. Re: [TenTec] cqww invites (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:19:17 -0400; Sounds like fun. Please send more info and details, while I research the rules, etc., and start grooming the XYL for "wife permission." Parenthetically, I like to cook for contest groups. Happy days.; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00068.html (7,799 bytes)
58. Re: [TenTec] UPDATE - 9420 PS Problem (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:09:49 -0400; Excellent news. NEVER enough good news. Nice work, Maestro. -- K8JHR -- After installation the Hercules II is back in business BUT even more surprising the replacement transformer mounted in the orig; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00079.html (8,963 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] Super Service as Usual ! (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:24:35 -0400; I bought a Jupiter on eBay by accident. Yeah... I was not really looking to buy another radio, but I recognized the seller as the son of a local ham (SK,) so I posted a moderately low bid to up the p; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00088.html (9,391 bytes)
60. Re: [TenTec] Super Service as Usual ! (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 02:07:03 -0400; Great, Bob, I think you will be happy. It might take a little time to get used to how the Orion II works, as it is a unique beast in all of hamdom. I have the Jupiter, and the Omni VII, along with a; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00092.html (8,965 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]