Mail Archive Search: <+from:jrichards@k8jhr.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jrichards@k8jhr.com: 668 ]

Total 668 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:55:13 -0400; Golly, Gary... I would not run both the 715 and the Omni VII onboard processor at once, ... or do I misunderstand what you are saying...? The Omni VII has its own RF-type processor, and the 715 is al; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00115.html (7,621 bytes)
62. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:57:38 -0400; Personally, Gary, after reading your comments over the past couple of years, and reviewing your setup procedure, I am confident you have managed to ring the most out of the rig and processor, pushing; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00129.html (11,845 bytes)
63. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:52:49 -0400; On 6/14/2013 9:55 PM, GARY HUBER wrote: If the 715 is set correctly and its output gain is near or less than that of the microphone only, then the OMNI's DSP processor should not be overdriven. Yes..; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00156.html (11,791 bytes)
64. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 01:06:19 -0400; I say we try Rick's market approach first, and only upon failing that, we invoke government action. Manufacturers are in it for the money, so if they are not selling radios, then they might be induce; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00157.html (10,578 bytes)
65. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor "TX IMD" (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:02:39 -0400; OK. You need a page about this on your web site, with one of your world famous spread sheets (ala your tuner spec report) and that will be a start. I forget how many Arlo Guthrie says makes a "moveme; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00165.html (11,665 bytes)
66. Re: [TenTec] OT: Latest ARRL ATU Test Results added to MATCHBOX SHOOTOUT (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:35:08 -0400; Footnote - My AT2K has a balun in it... it is an extra expense accessory on current models. -- K8JHR -- That's because it was measured in 3 different ways: (1) By itself (2) With external 1:1 Balun (; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00166.html (8,063 bytes)
67. Re: [TenTec] OT: Latest ARRL ATU Test Results added to MATCHBOX SHOOTOUT (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:19:33 -0400; I believe it is 4:1 and intended for use with open transmission line. -- K8JHR -- _____________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Ten; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00171.html (8,067 bytes)
68. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor "TX IMD" (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:08:33 -0400; Well said, CS. -- K8JHR -- Agency rules are just the starting point when it comes to administrative law (the law dealing with administrative agencies). _______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00203.html (9,447 bytes)
69. Re: [TenTec] antenna switches (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:26:49 -0400; ISOLATION.... I think the KEY is SUFFICIENT ISOLATION. I worry about A/B switches that lack sufficient isolation, and have seen the transmit signal of one rig in the receiver of the other rig - and I; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00207.html (9,096 bytes)
70. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor "TX IMD" (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:51:46 -0400; Oh Pshaw... Under your theory, CS, then it means anyone who buys all brand new TenTec equipment directly from the factory, has no right to expect his radio and amp to be within specification and oper; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00208.html (12,639 bytes)
71. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:55:59 -0400; Hi Fellows. I have a new Orionll and I just cannot get the audio right... I'm using a Behringer B-1 Mic and a VX2000... _______________________________________________ My thoughts parallel what the; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00239.html (11,531 bytes)
72. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:56:53 -0400; I also have one and I agree. As you know, Bob, many of those large diaphragm studio microphones are very sensitive, and as another ham once put it, they pick up the sound of a gnat's sneeze from acro; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00240.html (8,503 bytes)
73. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:30:24 -0400; Hi Barry - I may not have been sufficiently clear and your post causes me to pause and clarify: I agree the VR-2000 processor, itself, should not cause distortion - unless used improperly or with ina; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00245.html (9,346 bytes)
74. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor "TX IMD" (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:50:02 -0400; It is a little different here in Michigan... we can work South America and Africa along grey line during at least part of the contest, so aiming the beam due south is a good idea. I think SA stations; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00246.html (19,496 bytes)
75. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:18:15 -0400; A few thoughts... 1) It is possible you were given bad advice in the beginning. Saying your signal is "wide" is a somewhat vague, unscientific term; it hardly qualifies as a "term of art" all operato; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00251.html (12,872 bytes)
76. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor "TX IMD" (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:48:21 -0400; "along the grey line during at least part of the contest..." That should suggest I only operate in that direction during "part of the contest." Besides, the real point was to mention how much I enjoy; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00252.html (12,310 bytes)
77. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:00:11 -0400; The objection is misplaced, because Bob couched his original comment with the proviso "if"... such that 2800 Hz was stated merely as an example, or hypothetical case, and not proffered as a rule. ;-); /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00258.html (8,471 bytes)
78. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI & FD 2013 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:54:49 -0400; Nice story, Don. Thanks. Maybe Santa will bring you a new Orion II this year. -- K8JHR -- This year marks my 3rd Field Day in a row with my 'VI. _______________________________________________ ______; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00272.html (7,056 bytes)
79. [TenTec] Amplifier Question (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:17:50 -0400; OK... 1) How long do I need to wait before my Centurion amp is warmed up and ready to transmit? The manual says nothing, and I am sure one should not key the exciter too soon. But... how soon is too; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00285.html (7,960 bytes)
80. Re: [TenTec] Amplifier Question (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:30:57 -0400; Great. Exactly what I needed! -- JHR -- Watch the grid current. I rarely look at FWD and REF values. The PEAK meter tells me all I need to know. To tune, always use a combination of drive from the ex; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00292.html (10,014 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]