Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jrichards@k8jhr.com: 668 ]

Total 668 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] Amplifier Question (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:38:45 -0400
THANK YOU ALL for the quick and helpful answers about tuning my amp. The best bit is I am doing the right thing. I have a matchbox/tuner with a fairly reliable SWR/WATT meter beyond the amp, and I wa
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00293.html (8,970 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] OT: HAM RADIO 2013 in Friedrichshafen (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:29:26 -0400
GOOD LUCK, AND STAY SAFE, FRIEND. -- K8JHR -- HAM RADIO 2013, Europe's biggest Hamfest, is this weekend. _______________________________________________ ______________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00305.html (8,714 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] Amplifier Question (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:06:25 -0400
The Omni VII output is connected direct to the amp input. Also two QSK cables, RCA to RCA, are connected between the amp and transceiver. Er ... point taken, but you left out my home brew two-transce
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00306.html (14,461 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] Amplifier Question (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:06:59 -0400
Oh... that's good to know! That would be much cheaper and more gratifying than buying a bigger amp. (NOT!) :-) :-) -- K8JHR -- ______________________________________________ _________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00307.html (9,156 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] Amplifier Question (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:10:43 -0400
IMO, once you reach the point of max power out, you should back off the load control just a tiny little bit , while carefully observing the power out. At the first sign that backing off the load beg
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00308.html (9,145 bytes)

86. Re: [TenTec] Gnashing of Teeth (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 23:27:25 -0400
-- K8JHR -- On 6/30/2013 9:43 PM, Steve MIller wrote: Folks, while we all are sorry to see the O2 going out of production, it's not an excuse to hold an online funeral of the world. The radio is exce
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00050.html (8,091 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 23:48:58 -0400
Sheesh, call the Waaahhm-bulance. If Ten Tec can't get parts to produce radios, what would make us believe that they will be able to repair these radios in the future? There is no reason to expect an
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00051.html (11,048 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 00:14:57 -0400
The Omni VII does this, now. the Pegasus (along with N4PY control software) is very smooth and responsive and is a joy to operate and is still a decent performer. The Omni VII works that way. I THINK
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00052.html (9,333 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 01:08:09 -0400
I enjoyed this post more than any other in the past month. -- K8JHR -- Ive lived here since about 1968. Dad retired from the Air Force at Keesler. He was an air traffic controller...I spent many hour
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00053.html (12,832 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] Tx IMD and Purity (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:45:50 -0400
Gentlemen. Re: higher voltage circuits... would it be too difficult to develop a power supply, maybe a linear type, that outputs two different voltages for different parts of the radio? Specifically,
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00063.html (11,395 bytes)

91. [TenTec] My take on all the brouhaha over end of the Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:26:35 -0400
Gentlemen. We should be ashamed of ourselves. Why talk failure, doom and gloom because TT discontinued the Orion II? It is an 8 year old radio, based on an even older model. These things happen and w
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00086.html (9,856 bytes)

92. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 01:34:06 -0400
With refreshing and ergonomic changes many more years could be had. Why consider this is the end of the world? Why talk bout the Orion II as the paradigm or pinnacle of success? Perhaps TenTec will c
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00087.html (10,877 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 07:48:32 -0400
I wish they would ask me what I want to buy. -- K8JHR -- They just haven't announced a new model.........yet. ________________________________________ . ______________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00095.html (8,300 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] Opinions (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 20:35:06 -0400
ends, everyone has one. There have been many opinions here on these pages since the bad news. Geeze, Andy, why is it such bad news? I embarked on a dream. An all American and an all TenTec station. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00110.html (10,640 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:42:31 -0400
What type and length of transmission line are you using? I presume this is a regular old half wave dipole, right? If so, I believe the text book suggests that a regular old half wave dipole tends to
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00122.html (10,533 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:26:43 -0400
Oh... No, Stuart... THAT IS WAY TOO EASY! I cannot be that easy ! ;-) -- K8JHR -- You could add some loading wires on the ends of the dipole to work that part of the band, but it might affect the ope
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00127.html (8,483 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:23:35 -0400
Yes, thanks for posting the Smith Chart... but that means I will have to buy my local Elmer-Electronic Guru another lunch to induce him to explain it to me! Easy stuff for some guys, but I played a d
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00143.html (9,391 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 02:45:12 -0400
Really? Please explain. I ask because Rick DJ0IP and I have both spent considerable time researching and building various OCF dipoles to build multiple-band antennas which do not depend (or which dep
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00144.html (11,183 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 307G Speaker (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:06:35 -0400
Also does anyone have any comments as to CW operation with the speaker. -- Um... er... ah... Geeze, Larry, I expect a paddle or straight key will work much better. ;-) But seriously folks... My perso
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00145.html (8,686 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:46:43 -0400
Golly fellers, I guess I feel pretty foolish now, because, until today, my OCF dipole was working pretty well, with no evidence of feed line radiation. How can I tell if there is unwarranted feed lin
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00179.html (10,295 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu