Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jruing@ameritech.net: 1145 ]

Total 1145 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] [Ten-Tec-Omni-VII] WTB 302 Remote Encoder Keypad (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:54:08 -0400
No way.... I am keeping my pod! Just a note to say you should enjoy having it. Very handy to move the tuning point and some of the button controls anywhere on the desk. Happy trails. == JHR == -- ==
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00126.html (7,529 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] [Ten-Tec-Omni-VII] N4PY at Dayton (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 00:15:01 -0400
I will look for you for sure. Maybe even pay for another year of updates... Stay safe and travel well. == Richards - K8JHR == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTe
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00082.html (8,028 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertising (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:58:46 -0400
I agree the current ads do little to sell the equipment. I contacted TenTec about that recent ad which shows a graph over photos of the gear. I said it was ineffective at selling the radio, and that
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00223.html (8,629 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion 1 power connector (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:03:16 -0400
I think you can take the current connector off and solder new leads. == Just one idea... K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00224.html (8,663 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us... (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:36:10 -0400
Yep -- which brings me to MY question thereon... Is there any advantage to selling my Palstar AT2K tuner to acquire the new TenTec updated tuner? Would it be worthwhile trading up? I have contemplate
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00225.html (7,866 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 16:21:04 -0400
Hi Dave -- when did you buy it? == Richards - K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00228.html (6,923 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us... (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 23:22:38 -0400
That is my understanding, as well. I believe the better setting on the Pi network, i.e., Palstar, tuner is to pick the one with the highest Output capacitor setting, and lowest Input capacitor settin
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00235.html (8,411 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 23:24:32 -0400
Can anyone spell out for me what that means? == Richards - K8JHR == "The SSB Company" indeed! == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00236.html (8,255 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Advertizing (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 00:25:25 -0400
Thanks... that makes sense, and matches my expectations; but I do not feel it is a particular sexy or compelling approach. It seems like they hired the same ad company that used to advise IBM which u
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00240.html (9,079 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us... (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:22:26 -0400
Well... shoot, Jerry. Now I AM confused. I spoke with Paul Hrivnak and company at Dayton last Friday and that is what they told me to do... but now you are giving me somewhat different instructions.
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00247.html (9,178 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us... (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 01:19:46 -0400
Thank you for the further gloss on tuner performance... I must read it a dozen more times before I will get half of it. I am afraid that you have now jumped way over my level of comprehension. I have
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00257.html (14,433 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us... (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:06:24 -0400
On dipoles I usually use under 500 watts. On the big stick vertical, I usually use about 400-500 watts. I have strongly considered a tuner at the base of the stick as you suggest which would take the
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00269.html (9,779 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Palstar tuner (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:13:16 -0400
I did not draw the same conclusion from the piece. I purchased the Palstar tuner because they seemed rather close in performance and I took the advice of several local hams in the lunch bunch. I thou
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00280.html (8,652 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] 715 Processor with a HC4 Pro-Set? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:02:09 -0400
I think may be overkill to use the HC4 unit and the Model 715. Both devices are intended to accomplish the same sort of thing.... albeit in different ways. Using them together would emphasize the nar
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-06/msg00001.html (7,544 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ F.S. (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:31:11 -0400
Haven't you got a car, a boat, a kid, a wife or something else you could sell off, first...? ;-) Good luck anyway. == K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list T
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-06/msg00002.html (7,270 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT-1000D RF Compressor versus Ten-Tec 715 RF Clipper... not the same. (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:36:19 -0400
I purchased the 715 .... well... er.... just because I can. So I am really pleased to read such positive notes. Happy trails. == Anonymous - K8JHR == _______________________________________________ T
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-06/msg00003.html (7,136 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Mic Element (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:52:56 -0400
I would find a similar replacement element from Shure.com == James -K8JHR == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-06/msg00044.html (7,074 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] F.S. Ten Tec Jupiter #538AT Black with Blus Screen (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:23:37 -0400
Congrats on the new Omni VII. That is the best reason I have ever heard for selling a Jupiter... . . . . although I did not think one could have too many rigs. . . . that part has me puzzled. == Rich
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-06/msg00046.html (7,325 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Mic Element (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:40:33 -0400
A search of the web brings up this URL at the Ten-Tec wiki ... It appears Ten-Tec may have manufactured it as the originalTen-Tec owner owns the manufacturing dies and rights when he left ElectroVoic
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-06/msg00051.html (7,870 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Bias Adjustment on Century 21 (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:54:24 -0400
I have the manual and it does not have a schematic. I scanned dozens of manuals to PDF format for TenTec last year, and this is about the only one lacking multiple schematic drawings. == Richards - K
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-06/msg00081.html (7,302 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu