Mail Archive Search: <+from:k3ghh@arrl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k3ghh@arrl.net: 74 ]

Total 74 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 noise on some bands (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 22:29:15 -0400; Thanks, Cecil. It occurred to me today to try the sub-receiver; it works fine -- had a few QSOs using it on 20m CW. Turning back to the Main receiver, after again removing the A3 board and Deoxit'ing; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00182.html (11,394 bytes)
42. [TenTec] Service queue (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:25:29 -0400; FYI: TenTec received my Orion II two weeks ago, according to UPS. Hearing nothing about it, I called today and was told to expect a 6 to 8 week turnaround. -- -- John, K3GHH _________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00085.html (7,046 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:54:07 +0000; DX Engineering FCC050-H05-A 1:1 current choke on my vertical _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ten; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00387.html (7,084 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] [TenTec_Eagle] Re: Just ordered my Eagle (score: 1): Author: "John B. Egger" <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:45:45 -0400; I've often thought about commenting on these antenna/ground threads; Glenn's note and Rick's reply have provided the motivation. I understand Glenn's position, but have often felt immensely privilege; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00193.html (11,932 bytes)
45. [TenTec] Orion RX w/ boatanchor TX (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 01:33:51 +0000; I recently revived my first Novice transmitter (built from the 1957 RAH, but originally described in a 1953 QST); it uses a 6AG7 at 10w input. My plan is to use a coax relay on the antenna terminal o; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00263.html (7,102 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:04:49 -0500; When I became active again, in the mid-1980s, I picked up an analog Century 21 at a hamfest (I thought it was "modern," and compared to my DX-20 and NC-303 it was) and used it in the NTS traffic nets; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00258.html (8,763 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:38:28 -0500; Rick, I used an HRO-5 as a Novice. Each plug-in coil had a graph on the front showing a more-or-less linear relationship between the dial readout and frequency. I wonder how close to any particular f; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00282.html (10,032 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] How much should an ORION-III cost? (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:52:11 -0400; Guys, I paid ~$4,300 for my new Orion II (with two optional filters) in 2009. It's just not reasonable to expect an O3 to be offered at the same price. (Yes, I know... bare-bones?, what options?, etc; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00276.html (12,399 bytes)
49. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 21:14:24 -0400; 707 --> 709... I never see 708's mentioned, and that's what I have. What's the list's view of that mike? I'm a CW guy. Hope this isn't too far from the thread topic; Rodney's mention of these two ski; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00369.html (10,124 bytes)
50. Re: [TenTec] (ham station computer choice) (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 09:26:20 -0400; On Linux: I've been using Linux for 20 years -- unfortunately without really learning much about it. My previous shack computer was purchased with no OS, and this one had Ubuntu (I replaced it with K; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00104.html (15,096 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] Alpha Amplifiers and TEN-TEC Merge (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 12:08:05 -0400; The merger of these brands under the RF Concepts banner makes perfect sense," added Seedman, "Under the RF Concepts banner"? Does that mean the TenTec brand is disappearing? (Can we anticipate an "RF; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00171.html (14,601 bytes)
52. Re: [TenTec] OT: CQ Friedrichshafen Hamfest (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:56:39 -0400; Carter, just right-click on "From Rick -- DJ0IP/NJ0IP" and select "Compose message to" I am using Mozilla Thunderbird for my email. It has two choices, "Reply" and "Reply List". The latter, as expect; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00204.html (9,288 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] Mega Sale Monday Morning (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 19:11:05 -0400; Me too... guess I can quit jumping up when the UPS truck stops out front... --John K3GHH George, W6GF Sent from my iPad I placed an order (Eagle) on July 4th and didn't get a LL from anyone in TenTec; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00229.html (15,872 bytes)
54. [TenTec] Eagle AT slow? (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 18:33:41 -0400; I'd welcome some comments on the internal Eagle AT (Model 599AT). Here's mine: On 3570 KHz, where my MFJ-269 shows the old trap doublet has an SWR of 2.7, the Eagle took 15 seconds to tune. Leaving i; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00048.html (7,336 bytes)
55. Re: [TenTec] Eagle AT slow? (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 06:43:30 -0400; Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote: I can explain why the tuner has to retune on the same frequency.......as stated by the operator " Leaving it on that frequency, a minute or so later a second try also took 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00066.html (9,371 bytes)
56. [TenTec] OT: Progresso Soup (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:51:50 -0500; This is almost as OT as they get, so OT foes, hit Delete immediately! Is anyone else in our group bugged by the Progresso soup TV ad that features a tin-can "telephone"? Surely some of you, like me,; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-12/msg00035.html (7,262 bytes)
57. Re: [TenTec] OT: Progresso Soup (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 09:39:17 -0500; Thanks for good comments, guys. I was glad to see from Karl KO8S, that I was not (quite!) alone, and Ken explained how the simple science, which is probably what appealed to us budding hams, could be; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-12/msg00050.html (10,628 bytes)
58. Re: [TenTec] BUNGEE CORDS (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 15:40:11 -0500; After losing a few of my roof-mounted vertical's radials to ice and falling branches, I installed weights on the support ropes. To find the minimum necessary weight (and lacking that type of scale),; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-12/msg00375.html (8,717 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] kHz / kC (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 07:19:00 -0400; Amusing observation on the kc/s -> Hz terminological change: Some sharp fellow, and I forget who and where it was published, suggested naming the unit for Charles Proteus Steinmetz instead of Heinric; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-03/msg00249.html (10,955 bytes)
60. [TenTec] Orion II and new 2K-FL amp (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:56:12 -0400; Baby steps here, coping with my first-ever amplifier... First question: A phono cable must run from the amplifier's "Relay 1" jack to ... something on the O2. Is it TX OUT 1, TX EN 1, or AMP KEY 1? T; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-10/msg00094.html (9,357 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]