Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6jek@comcast.net: 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] TenTec and Alpha merger not a good thing (score: 1)
Author: K6JEK <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:17:09 -0700
I've done both. Lost the 3CX800A7s in the Titan (operator error) and the MRF454s in the Hercules, cause unknown. I had to take out a second mortgage for the tubes. A new matched pair cost $995. I fou
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00228.html (13,285 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Best of Luck de W4TJE (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 21:00:30 -0700
It sure feels like you're right about the demographics judging by the guys I talk to on the air and see at the local swap meets. They are not spring chickens. The ARRL paints a rosier picture. Highes
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00238.html (11,928 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] RX366 9 MHz Out (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 16:47:17 -0700
Kim, Do you, sir, have pictures of that 1946 Cessna on the web somewhere? I would love to see them. I bet I'm not the only one. Jon "Used to think I was crazy but I'm nothing compared to this" K
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00286.html (13,935 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 23:01:02 -0700
Why is braid to be eschewed especially inside the shack?
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00375.html (10,503 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec custom enclosures comment... (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 14:02:48 -0700
You mean Canadian companies like Hammond
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00666.html (10,166 bytes)

26. [TenTec] OMNI VII, Herc II, QSK (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:30:20 -0700
Anyone using the OMNI VII with a Hercules II QSK? It's not working here. I notice the H II drops the TX EN/Key out line from 4.1 to 1.2 volts when it's keyed. This doesn't seem to be good enough for
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00198.html (7,410 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII, Herc II, QSK (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:19:07 -0700
No, they don't work together in QSK and never did. To make them work, short D11 on the control board of the Hercules II. Hours of sleuthing and puzzling over the QSK circuitry and consulting with my
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00284.html (8,206 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] How much for an Orion III? (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:43:04 -0700
I can't believe I sold my KWM-2. This thread is killing me.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00292.html (9,541 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII, Herc II, QSK (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 22:03:29 -0700
Perhaps you lead a charmed life. Mine didn't work. Garry Green of Ten-Tec service said, indeed it doesn't work as designed with the OMNI VII. With earlier transceivers, yes. With the OMNI VII, no. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00302.html (10,644 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] How much for an Orion III? (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:10:38 -0700
I would have had nightmares for years if I'd witnessed that. I may have them anyway just hearing about it.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00321.html (15,619 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Noise from Fans (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:41:48 -0800
Nicely done. Not on Ten-Tec but on other gear I've built temperature controllers. Most of the time the fans run at a snail's pace and make essentially zero noise. They only pick up the pace when they
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00087.html (11,894 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Corsair noise blanker and frequency display (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:14:16 -0800
FWIW my Corsair does exactly the same thing on both counts.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00046.html (10,343 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:01:31 -0800
I know. As an aficionado of vintage equipment I agree in spirt. But on SSB it really is delightful to talk with people who are actually on frequency, a rarity with vintage gear but the norm now with
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00241.html (11,179 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 16:03:01 -0800
My experience is that with modern equipment, when people say they are on 3895 they actually are, +/- not much and they actually stay there. Land yourself on that number and you've got it. With older
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00246.html (15,283 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:03:39 -0800
Hey, We have a lot of the same equipment. I'm not the guy complaining about others. I'm the offending party. I have a lot of experience being off frequency. For years, maybe a decade I was in regular
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00252.html (18,189 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 19:11:56 -0800
Fine stuff. I have a 2B too. My CE 100V from 1959 was the best sounding SSB transmitter I had for a long time. I always get compliments even from the HiFi SSB people. Later when I got the OMNI VII an
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00261.html (11,617 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:30:35 -0800
They don't complain. They just advise. BTW, Jon, you're 50 Hz high or whatever. When we aren't doing a round table but just jumping in, I know it's annoying to be pushing the RIT whenever party X tra
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00266.html (14,663 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 10:36:24 -0800
I certainly got everyone riled up with this one, didn't I? Just to be clear, these guys were not giving me grief but I still don't like being the guy who is off frequency all the time even though I o
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00271.html (11,122 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:44:05 -0800
We can morph the thread into just how bad was the old stuff. I just got through resurrecting a Heathkit AR-3. On that one, the entire 80M band is about 3/4" of dial with tic marks every 100 kc. I act
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00274.html (12,074 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:44:51 -0800
What does a 15 Hz difference sound like? Anyone can easily hear the difference between say A1 = 55 Hz and C#2 = 69.3 Hz. That's 4 semi-tones. That is a lot, from Do right past Ray all the way to Mi.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00278.html (10,828 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu