Mail Archive Search: <+from:k8vt@ameritech.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k8vt@ameritech.net: 296 ]

Total 296 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] Orion Aesthetics Comment (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 09:23:35 -0500; No, you're not alone. You say "ostentatious", I say "tacky". Definitely NOT the look for a $3300 radio. You and Ron are right on the mark. At the very least, lose the gold (or silver) trim. At best--; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00287.html (9,852 bytes)
22. [TenTec] Auto tuner in Orion (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 16:03:57 -0500; I vote "no" for a built in tuner (really a "trimmer"). In addition to the cost and space, two problems come to mind with internal tuners: 1) Limited matching range. Most internal "tuners" can match f; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00319.html (7,617 bytes)
23. [TenTec] Auto tuner in Orion (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 20:14:35 -0500; Gee, Steve...sorry I hit such a raw nerve and generated all that sarcasm. As you have chosen to reply in a public forum, I will do the same. Been using an Omni 6 since 1994 and have never blown a fus; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00337.html (12,666 bytes)
24. [TenTec] Orion Aesthetics..Another point of View (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 08:34:47 -0500; Why??? Serendipity??? I've never owned an Elecraft nor am I planning on getting one (so no ax to grind), just read various favorable reviews. You've piqued my curiosity as to how being careless can; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00373.html (8,090 bytes)
25. [TenTec] Count your blessings? (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 20:53:47 -0500; I'm probably wrong, but I think many of us believed (or hoped) that at least part of the reason for this "pre-introduction" release was done exactly TO generate comments and feedback before everythin; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00426.html (8,270 bytes)
26. [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:09:20 -0500; Thought you were going to refer to Red Green's duct tape.... ;-) 73/Carter/K8VT; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00478.html (7,178 bytes)
27. [TenTec] KB7OEX: a big plus favoring ORION (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:06:42 -0500; Not just Icom. Welcome to the Japanese "Radio of the Month" Club.... 73/Carter/K8VT; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00535.html (8,893 bytes)
28. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:02:25 -0500; May I ask why? My calculator shows about 1.7 db difference between 100 and 150 watts, about one quarter of an S-unit. Driving an amplifier? My 100 watt Omni drives the TT Centurion (2 X 3-500) to ful; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00691.html (8,196 bytes)
29. [TenTec] TenTec OMNI V FM'ing any ideas? (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:02:53 -0500; "Ripple" is not to be confused with "regulation", which seems to be happening here... REGULATION is the 60 mv droop you are seeing between no load and full load. RIPPLE is the 60 Hz (half-wave rectif; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00880.html (8,323 bytes)
30. Rumor control (was [TenTec] discount) (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 13:23:44 -0500; C'mon guys, let's get back to reality. Please read carefully. This was started by a reader of the reflector (as a joke), NOT TT. Now some are taking it as true. A beautiful example of how rumors star; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00465.html (7,836 bytes)
31. [TenTec] Jupiter frequency jump? (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 18:19:34 -0500; Well, yes, I have a comment or two and thank you for asking. Yes, been there, done that, got the lecture. Also true. BTW, what ultimately helped in my case was a "choke balun", essentially a foot lon; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00043.html (10,253 bytes)
32. [TenTec] AF COntrol on OMNI 6+ (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 09:51:29 -0500; Yes, it probably is. It is supposed to be a fixed level output. You may want to check with TT directly. 73/Carter/K8VT; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00148.html (7,432 bytes)
33. [TenTec] Omni VI + (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:06:14 -0500; Paul, That is a tough question to answer. Like asking about a Cadillac vs. a Chevy. They will both get you there. The Jupiter is a $1000 radio and the Omni VI is a $2000+ radio, so they obviously can; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00166.html (7,756 bytes)
34. [TenTec] Reliable Voice/CW Keyer for Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 17:53:39 -0500; Four pin and electret have nothing to do with it... Also not true. The Heil cartridge has a bit lower output...I had to put the mike gain up quite high and did not have quite enough vox gain to get r; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00225.html (8,296 bytes)
35. [TenTec] Omni QSK Relay Delay (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 22:53:47 -0500; Jim, Don't know about the rest of your problem, but the "01 to 15" range you are seeing is most likely NOT in milliseconds. This appears to be the standard RELATIVE indication that the Omni 6 uses fo; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00003.html (6,809 bytes)
36. [TenTec] RX-350 (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 09:21:02 -0400; Other issues aside (cost, features, etc), does this mean that TT is starting to use dealers again???? Is this a change in their "no dealer" policy or have I missed something? 73/Carter/K8VT; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00041.html (8,132 bytes)
37. [TenTec] Centurion 422E problems (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 07:15:46 -0400; Guenther, I had a similar problem with my Centurion when I purchased it used several years ago. What I found was that Ten Tec had three versions of the board you describe below. The earlier two versi; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-09/msg00134.html (7,477 bytes)
38. [TenTec] Weird Jupiter Xmit Problem (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 09:19:00 -0400; Bob, An interesting post. I have had an Omni 6 (now 6+) since 1994 and initially had RF problems (RF getting IN to the radio). However, I didn't know that TT provided any "RF related" mods. In your p; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-07/msg00037.html (8,809 bytes)
39. [TenTec] Ten Tec & RF sensitivity (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 11:48:04 -0400; We all know and love our TT rigs; just look at the level of support and loyalty on this reflector. However, nothing in this world is perfect, including TT. If I have found one weak spot with my Omni; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00109.html (8,802 bytes)
40. [TenTec] Trade Omni VI Plus, Power Supply & #238 Tuner (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 07:13:14 -0400; <snip> Well, the first suggestion that comes to mind is to....ask TT. Call, write or e-mail; I am sure they will be willing to explain the process and give you a quote. However, as with any "trade-in; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00047.html (7,693 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]