Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k8vt@ameritech.net: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TenTec] Re: Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:24:31 -0400
...as has been stated numerous times before in this forum: with color, it would then be a $3700 or $3800 radio. 73/Carter/K8VT
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00302.html (9,371 bytes)

202. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:34:03 -0400
Same with this--after a week or two of hearing all the high and low frequencies in addition to the mid-range you won't want to go back to < 2.8 KHz. Rob, I guess I'm missing something. It would seem
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00118.html (8,493 bytes)

203. Re: [RE: [TenTec] RFI and Orion ] (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 21:45:32 -0400
Guess I missed it too. Bob, can you please (re)explain this "Monster Balun? 73/Carter/K8VT Bob, it's your balun and your concept....you tell the story. Mike, I've just started working on mine. My big
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00403.html (8,429 bytes)

204. Re: [TenTec] Problem with 705 mic (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:59:55 -0500
1. The mic came without a 9 volt battery, so I put one in and noticed the red transmit LED was on. 2. Hitting both the PTT and lock switches on the base had no effect on turning it off. 3. I opened t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00359.html (8,876 bytes)

205. First dot (was Re: [TenTec] Orion in action) (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 07:58:50 -0500
And yes, there is some clipping on the first couple of dot on the Orion. Tom - W4BQF Been reading about this topic for awhile. I also saw the keying picture in QST with the first dot shortened. Howe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00708.html (10,267 bytes)

206. Re: [TenTec] Buying a New Orion? (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 08:56:54 -0500
The goal should be 756Pro class performance, mine hasn't needed a power reset in the two years I've owned it, nor have I ever pressed a button that put it into an "unwelcome state". I hope you won't
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00662.html (8,423 bytes)

207. Re: [TenTec] new Orion group on Yahoo (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 07:12:52 -0400
J. D. wrote: I don't see the Yahoo privacy policy as an issue. If you don't input accurate information in the first place, what is there to fear? Put anything in but the real information. Let them sh
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00126.html (8,748 bytes)

208. Re: [TenTec] Re: ~ 1/4 wave 160 doublet (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:56:00 -0400
Conclusions: I might not hear much more again, but at least I could participate in 160 meter activity around the islands out here, what there is of it. Jim, "Don't worry, be happy". Just put up what
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00670.html (9,465 bytes)

209. Re: [TenTec] Request experiences with Centurion (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 18:40:07 -0400
I'm fixin' to buy an amplifier to replace my SB220 Heathkit that was toasted by lightning. I've about decided on the Ten-Tec Centurion 422B and wonder what experiences you have had with it. And if yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00284.html (9,530 bytes)

210. Re: [TenTec] Is this how it is done today? (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 10:03:54 -0400
Please send me your address, and shipping preference (UPS, etc). I will check online for the shipping from here to you with UPS. If you prefer a different method of shipment, let me know. Here is my
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00626.html (10,512 bytes)

211. Re: [TenTec] T tuner (transmatch) losses? (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 21:36:44 -0400
denton wrote: Too bad no one is making the old link coupled transmatches anymore...I have a Johnson Matchbox..the 250 watt version...that I use for a basis of efficiency testing. Nothing I have ever
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00048.html (9,625 bytes)

212. Re: [TenTec] Centurion mod (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 21:54:48 -0400
Rob Atkinson, K5UJ wrote: I'm working from memory--I'm sure someone else knows exactly what this is or you can find it in the reflector archive--the Centurion originally was biased so the 3-500s were
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00049.html (8,522 bytes)

213. Re: [TenTec] Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 18:47:17 -0400
It feeds about fifty feet of balanced line to a 950' horizontal loop. Driven by a Jupiter into a Dentron Cliperton L. Note the insulated shaft to the knob in the second picture. After building and in
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00356.html (10,103 bytes)

214. Re: [TenTec] (Say 73 to) 60M (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 06:55:22 -0400
Considering who is behind the the four objecting comments - United Power Line council (UPLC), Power Line Carrier Association (PLCA), Homeplug Powerline Alliance (Homeplug), and The National Telecomm
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00469.html (7,510 bytes)

215. Re: [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 07:10:25 -0400
Don't get me wrong, this will be a nice band for some experimentation in antennas and propagation, but I just don't see what practical use we'll be able to make of it. I could be wrong, but I though
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00470.html (9,294 bytes)

216. Re: [TenTec] Old Modes never die... they just get soundcard support! (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 07:29:41 -0500
Duane, I agree with you...unfortunately, the radio manufactures have not yet reached that exalted state. I respectfully disagree, at least as long as *many* operators are clueless as to how to proper
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00148.html (10,716 bytes)

217. [TenTec] Omni VI & CMOS Superkeyer (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 16:37:49 -0500
Group, I'm using an Omni VI+ (Option 3) and just completed building the Idiom Press "CMOS Super Keyer III" kit (built into a WBL paddle, but that's another story). The keyer has a "K" parameter that
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00153.html (8,535 bytes)

218. Re: [TenTec] my non-working dipole. why?? (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:52:52 -0400
Bob, The tuner should generally be within a few feet of the transmitter. If you can arrange to use the dipole with the tuner close to the rig, you should find that it will perform better than your wh
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00777.html (7,943 bytes)

219. Re: [TenTec] Re: Radio Shack 25 amp switching supply? (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 20:07:00 -0500
For what it's worth, the Radio Shack supply (Model 22-510, $59.95) *appears* to look identical to the Samlex listed above. 73/Carter/K8VT
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00447.html (7,630 bytes)

220. Re: [TenTec] Will W5YR be back? (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:24:08 -0500
No, you're not.... (and I thought the original flamer was *EXTREMELY* rude) 73/Carter/K8VT
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00459.html (7,506 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
This search system is powered by Namazu