Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k8vt@ameritech.net: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [TenTec] Be Careful Updating (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 07:13:06 -0500
Ken, I have an Omni 6+, not a Jupiter so I'm not sure how it's constructed, but is it possible to just pull out the EPROM chip (or even the card the chip is on) and send that to TT rather than the en
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00592.html (7,744 bytes)

222. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Filter Question (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:09:52 -0400
Bill, I've experienced the same problem with my Omni 6+ 250 Hz filter in the past. It most likely has nothing to do with a defective filter or the narrow bandpass (although anything can go bad). The
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00238.html (8,359 bytes)

223. [TenTec] Selling stuff-pet peeve (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 18:04:27 -0400
Well group, I'm probably just getting grumpy in my old age and /or have too much time on my hands. Anyway, here is my pet peeve: When someone is selling something on this reflector, many times it is
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00149.html (8,821 bytes)

224. Re: [TenTec] Another Bit - Bad Pegasus Audio Problem (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 08:14:37 -0400
Sounds a lot like RF...try transmitting into a dummy load and/or greatly reduced power and see if the problem goes away. 73/Carter/K8VT
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00079.html (8,482 bytes)

225. Re: [TenTec] In Rush Protection (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 10:12:08 -0400
Well, at least for my Centurion (I'm the second owner, amp built in '93 or '94 [?]), the answer is: yes and no. It all depends on how you define "in-rush protection". To my understanding, that phrase
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00500.html (8,903 bytes)

226. Re: [TenTec] Is Jupiter better than the Icom 746 (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 18:03:51 -0500
<snip> <snip> OOoooooh, nooooo. It sounds like Joe is saying that the Jupiter is more susceptible to RF than the ICOM. I hope this is not a portent of things to come with the Orion... 73/Carter/K8VT
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00019.html (10,083 bytes)

227. [TenTec] Orion RF hardening (was Is Jupiter better...) (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 21:36:26 -0500
Always good advice!!! :-) I agree... I disagree. My Omni 6+ is very susceptible to RF. Yes, I have 450 ohm ladder line coming into the shack and yes there are unequal currents flowing in each leg (i.
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00036.html (10,831 bytes)

228. Re: [TenTec] Orion RF hardening (was Is Jupiter better...) (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 09:54:26 -0500
In theory, you are absolutely right; however, in practice, (unless you are very lucky), it is almost never balanced. One end is closer to a tree or a fence or a roof or whatever. There is darned litt
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00056.html (10,855 bytes)

229. Re: [TenTec] Dirty Band Switch?? (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 08:58:42 -0500
Mike, Whoever told you that had to be pulling your leg, right? I don't know about Easy Off specifically, but in general, oven cleaners are EXTREMELY strong and used to contain lye (nasty stuff). Thin
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00045.html (7,751 bytes)

230. [TenTec] TT Listening ?/ Orion (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 12:00:06 -0500
Preamble/Disclaimer: Before you turn on your flame throwers, I love TT and have been a (mostly-see below) happy owner of an Omni VI+ (Option 3) and Centurion since 1994 and will most likely upgrade t
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00169.html (8,648 bytes)

231. Re: [TenTec] Orion Aesthetics Comment (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 09:23:35 -0500
No, you're not alone. You say "ostentatious", I say "tacky". Definitely NOT the look for a $3300 radio. You and Ron are right on the mark. At the very least, lose the gold (or silver) trim. At best--
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00284.html (10,216 bytes)

232. [TenTec] Auto tuner in Orion (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 16:03:57 -0500
I vote "no" for a built in tuner (really a "trimmer"). In addition to the cost and space, two problems come to mind with internal tuners: 1) Limited matching range. Most internal "tuners" can match f
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00316.html (7,821 bytes)

233. Re: [TenTec] Auto tuner in Orion (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 20:14:35 -0500
Gee, Steve...sorry I hit such a raw nerve and generated all that sarcasm. As you have chosen to reply in a public forum, I will do the same. Been using an Omni 6 since 1994 and have never blown a fus
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00334.html (12,941 bytes)

234. Re: [TenTec] Orion Aesthetics..Another point of View (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 08:34:47 -0500
Why??? Serendipity??? I've never owned an Elecraft nor am I planning on getting one (so no ax to grind), just read various favorable reviews. You've piqued my curiosity as to how being careless can
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00370.html (8,436 bytes)

235. Re: [TenTec] Count your blessings? (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 20:53:47 -0500
I'm probably wrong, but I think many of us believed (or hoped) that at least part of the reason for this "pre-introduction" release was done exactly TO generate comments and feedback before everythin
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00423.html (8,586 bytes)

236. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:09:20 -0500
Thought you were going to refer to Red Green's duct tape.... ;-) 73/Carter/K8VT
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00475.html (7,414 bytes)

237. Re: [TenTec] KB7OEX: a big plus favoring ORION (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:06:42 -0500
Not just Icom. Welcome to the Japanese "Radio of the Month" Club.... 73/Carter/K8VT
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00532.html (9,159 bytes)

238. Re: [TenTec] Orion (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:02:25 -0500
May I ask why? My calculator shows about 1.7 db difference between 100 and 150 watts, about one quarter of an S-unit. Driving an amplifier? My 100 watt Omni drives the TT Centurion (2 X 3-500) to ful
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00688.html (8,442 bytes)

239. Re: [TenTec] TenTec OMNI V FM'ing any ideas? (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:02:53 -0500
"Ripple" is not to be confused with "regulation", which seems to be happening here... REGULATION is the 60 mv droop you are seeing between no load and full load. RIPPLE is the 60 Hz (half-wave rectif
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00877.html (8,527 bytes)

240. Rumor control (was [TenTec] discount) (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 13:23:44 -0500
C'mon guys, let's get back to reality. Please read carefully. This was started by a reader of the reflector (as a joke), NOT TT. Now some are taking it as true. A beautiful example of how rumors star
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00450.html (8,153 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu