Mail Archive Search: <+from:k8vt@ameritech.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k8vt@ameritech.net: 296 ]

Total 296 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 15:22:49 -0400; I suspect you are correct. This does not surprise me in that the antenna itself (132 foot dipole at 25 feet above ground) is anything but physically balanced. The dipole is not in a straight line (be; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00351.html (11,625 bytes)
242. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 15:24:04 -0400; If the line is operating anywhere near a balanced Well, I guess it depends on your definition of "little" radiation. In my case, I have measured greater current in one leg of the ladder line than th; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00352.html (10,776 bytes)
243. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 15:24:35 -0400; What you and Bob say makes sense. However I did not mention this earlier, so let me clarify the situation: I had this problem from Day One with the Omni VI -- and no data connection to the radio at t; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00353.html (10,241 bytes)
244. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 15:25:23 -0400; Yeah, but... I HAVE connected the mic to the mic input -- a 705(?) TT and a Heil Pro headset. Neither works above ~ 10 watts input, even with the mic cable using various styles and quantities of ferr; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00354.html (12,541 bytes)
245. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 22:45:58 -0400; Absolutely true -- but I have never yet used the rear connector. Use the mike when needed but disconnect the rear pnl connection. Same when using the audio in on the rear, disconnect the mike. Again,; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00367.html (10,501 bytes)
246. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:57:21 -0400; A bit unlikely. However, a few years ago, I used a Drake TR-7 on SSB at full power (antenna and everything else the same) and it worked fine. Caveat: I am sure that the TR-7 is a lot less "computeriz; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00410.html (14,799 bytes)
247. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:57:33 -0400; Using a Palomar Engineers clamp-on RF ammeter, I measured 0.9 A in one leg and 1.3 A in the other on 20 meters. 73, Carter K8VT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Ten; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00411.html (10,570 bytes)
248. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:58:11 -0400; Yes, I have a Tektronix DMM (IMHO nicer than the Fluke 83 and 87 I've got -- but that's another story) that has a low ohms scale that compensates for the test leads. I will try it, but I am not sure; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00412.html (10,728 bytes)
249. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 17:53:33 -0400; Bob, When you were at Dayton, I believe you were the one that mentioned that your physical inspection of the Omni VII indicated a potential "pin 1" problem. This sort of agrees with my asking TT tech; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00787.html (9,042 bytes)
250. Re: [TenTec] Trading Radio's (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 19:53:54 -0400; 1) My apologies to you and Bob for the mix up. 2) Thanks for the interesting test outlined below. 3) The question begs to be asked: How come the older solid state radios (like my TR-7) did not exhibi; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00790.html (12,091 bytes)
251. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 19:54:09 -0400; Sorry for the delayed response -- been out of the loop for awhile... No doubt true -- but if I shorten one leg to balance it on one band, will it still be unbalanced on other bands? Possibly a moot p; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00791.html (12,364 bytes)
252. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:26:17 -0400; I would like to know how you made the interface cable. I presume you mean the 4 pin to 8 pin mic cable. If so, I bought it at the time I bought the Advantage. 73, Carter K8VT ________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00079.html (6,999 bytes)
253. Re: [TenTec] OT: CQ Friedrichshafen Hamfest (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:34:10 -0400; I am using Mozilla Thunderbird for my email. It has two choices, "Reply" and "Reply List". The latter, as expected, goes to tentec@contesting.com When I use "Reply" (presumably direct to the poster),; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00203.html (8,532 bytes)
254. Re: [TenTec] OT: CQ Friedrichshafen Hamfest (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:53:09 -0400; Thanks to you (and all the others) for the responses. Unfortunately, when I did that, it still came up as "tentec@contesting.com In Thunderbird, it has two "reply" choices: Reply to All -- which goe; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00205.html (9,174 bytes)
255. Re: [TenTec] OT: CQ Friedrichshafen Hamfest (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:40:56 -0400; Rick (and others that have replied), Don't want to be repetitive, but whether I choose "Reply", "Reply List" or right-click on "From", the *ONLY* thing I ever see is "tentec@contesting.com", nothing; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00212.html (9,898 bytes)
256. Re: [TenTec] OT: CQ Friedrichshafen Hamfest (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:07:58 -0400; Reed, Thanks for the thought ("Manually type in Rick's email address Rick@dj0ip.de") , BUT... ...there is one minor flaw with your suggestion: Until I received your message above and one other messag; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00230.html (10,320 bytes)
257. Re: [TenTec] Scout has vy low Pwr out on some bands (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 09:18:06 -0400; Well, it looks like the "bond paper" issue has been answered sufficiently, so let me throw out a comment about the restricted space issue... I have no idea if there is an equivalent item in Germany,; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00524.html (10,819 bytes)
258. Re: [TenTec] Old timers... (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:41:47 -0400; I had the pleasure of meeting Al Kahn and Jack Burchfield 15-17 years ago in person at a semi-private ham get together in southwest Michigan... _______________________________________________ TenTec; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00793.html (7,327 bytes)
259. Re: [TenTec] Why is Eagle #2 on order? (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 09:43:35 -0400; On 8/1/2014 8:17 PM, Mike Stricker via TenTec wrote: Years ago I had someone send via UPS a package to me. A few days after it was due, I began inquiring. UPS said it was delivered and the sender pro; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00043.html (8,881 bytes)
260. Re: [TenTec] Hercules 444 amp (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 21:32:34 -0400; My Centurion (which I obtained used 20 years ago) finally had one of its tubes [rather spectacularly] go to the great beyond. Unless I get really lucky and find a NOS pair at the e-place, it seems li; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00148.html (10,424 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]