Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kc9cdt@aol.com: 561 ]

Total 561 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:58:28 -0400 (EDT)
I am not happy with NR on the OII either.. But it's a great radio.. 73, Lee I have an Eagle and as others can buy an Orion II or any other radio costing uch more, but why not fix the NR of this one o
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00120.html (11,668 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] new amp (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:56:32 -0400 (EDT)
Well, It seems high to me too, but there is a need for it. Like QRP rigs (Elecraft, TT, Flex guys wanting 100 watts now & then. But, look at the Elecraft 500 watt amp at $2,000!!! WOW, that's too muc
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00168.html (8,326 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] New amp Flex 1500 DOES have open collector (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 21:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
So...that means the new TT amp will work FB with the 1500?? 73, Lee OH, OK, that is good for the design, bad for the manual writer not aking it clear. A lot of times info on external connectors is la
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00238.html (9,413 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] rx 366 (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:16:45 -0400 (EDT)
I was told that it is GC, but the original second RX was a little better in that mode..BUT the ham band function was like the Eagle (superb!). 73, Lee Lee Simmonds Summit DCS LLC 260-799-4077 Office
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00031.html (11,584 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] rx 366 (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 19:06:09 -0400 (EDT)
Nope, The actuaal guy at TT that did a lot of the testing told me it is not as good on GC. Can't remember the specifics...but you could contact TT for the details. He told me for SWL, keep the origin
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00035.html (9,476 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] thinking of getting new Orion II (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 22:08:09 -0400 (EDT)
John, I was told by TT that the new 366 second RX was NOT as GOOD for SWL (Non-Ham band) 73, Lee I am thinking of trading in my present Orion II and omni VII for a new loaded with new 2nd tx Orion II
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00002.html (8,261 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 10:15:53 -0400 (EDT)
Ray, Even though the KWM-2 is not a good CW transiever (never was designed to be) it is still a super SSB tranceiver. I use mine regularly and to tell the truth...95% of the time it's ALL you need. W
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00068.html (8,545 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:33:00 -0400 (EDT)
Yes...it'a all about the emission standards, FCC enforcement etc. FCC is not doing the job...no surprise...all they want to do these days is sell frequency's. Also, look at all the crap operations on
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00093.html (15,017 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:48:06 -0400 (EDT)
Well, Small government?? It's huge and growing daily! I don't blame 'small government' I blame POOR GOVERNMENT. There a several things the federal government should do VERY WELL and they are NOT doin
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00098.html (11,622 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:06:03 -0400 (EDT)
Yep...use the old KWM-2 regularly...never had any complaints... it is a real pleasure to use. 73, Lee Jim, based on that (which I fully believe), our only recourse is to START EMANDING CLEANER TRANSM
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00102.html (12,320 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 18:56:32 -0400 (EDT)
FCC and the radio companys and ARRL caused this...all due to wanting more income. I'll leave it at that. We should do better self policing...cause maybe someday, as they LET it get worse & worse...th
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00126.html (11,250 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Receiver S meter values (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 09:16:40 -0400 (EDT)
Bob, I sure do think my Orion II s meter is way off after S-9 especially...is that normal for them? Maybe I should actually see what it is with the 8640B sig gen. 73, Lee I seem to believe that most
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00267.html (18,276 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Orion II settings for 706 mic (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:58:14 -0400 (EDT)
Ray, I thought the only radios to use electret mic were Icom radios?? 73, Lee FYI, here are the settings I've evolved for the 706 electret mic and v3.028: H/W Mic gain 3.0 dB Front panel mic gain 40
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00057.html (9,020 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Orion II settings for 706 mic (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:49:41 -0400 (EDT)
Rick, I see...so what advantage is the electrec mic? Never owned one. 73, Lee Lee, You have to keep in mind the difference between "use" and "ship with". Most radios can use (are compatible with), el
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00072.html (10,899 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Orion II settings for 706 mic (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:08:16 -0400 (EDT)
Based on that info..I sure would not buy a 707. Why did TT create a mic with that low output? 73, Lee Generally , but not always. The Collins MM-1 dynamic hand-held mic that I use with my KWM-2 is ra
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00075.html (8,810 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Orion II settings for 706 mic (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:24:04 -0400 (EDT)
How would you compare it to a Heil goldline on the wide setting...thay's what I use. Anyone? 73, Lee Because the 707 sounds great if the radio can accommodate it. It worked fine witfh the Orion II v2
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00077.html (8,759 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] A Basic Orion II Question (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:30:55 -0400 (EDT)
USB 1-2kc BW Lee Simmonds Summit DCS LLC   260-799-4077 Office 260-403-6936 Cell This is really back to basics. Since the O2 doesn't have a dedicated digital mode, how do I set the radio do operate p
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00080.html (7,674 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Model 565...Need ORIGINAL 2nd rcvr STANDARD board. (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:02:31 -0400 (EDT)
Hi gang,Working with my good friend Richard on his Orion I. We have an intermittent 2nd RX....have reseated everything...and it still is intermittent. Thinking it might be the RX board. So, that said
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00138.html (11,532 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] 566 Orion II Firmware Version V3.029 ---Spectrum Display & Tuning dot (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:19:14 -0400 (EDT)
Yes, I liked the tuning dot as well. 73, Lee Lee Simmonds Summit DCS LLC   260-799-4077 Office 260-403-6936 Cell --Original Message-- From: N4be_Jim <n4be_jim@yahoo.com> To: tentec <tentec@contesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00250.html (9,701 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] 566 Orion II Firmware Version V3.029 ---SpectrumDisplay &Tuning... (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:36:45 -0400 (EDT)
On my Orion II...the ATTn and pre-amp changes the s meter reading a lot?? What do you mean on TT radios the same is true of the ATTN and Pre-amp as to the s-9 = 50uv? Thanks, 73, Lee --Original Messa
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00275.html (16,322 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu