Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kc9cdt@aol.com: 561 ]

Total 561 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [TenTec] 2.031 QSK (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:50:00 EST
Been using my OII with 2.031 for a couple days with Alpha 91B full QSK . Works OK so far. I'm keeping an eye on it! Lee
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00215.html (6,444 bytes)

322. Re: [TenTec] OII TX Audio experiment/findings (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 16:29:18 EST
Grant, OK, now let me understand this.... the tool I am supposed to use to set all this up may be screwed up too? I sincerely hope the folks at TT are working all week end. Lee
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00220.html (7,254 bytes)

323. Re: [TenTec] Need Orion II V 2.030 (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 08:37:48 EST
It is in your directory that you got when you downloaded the update code for OII from RF Squared. Lee
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00256.html (6,801 bytes)

324. Re: [TenTec] Orion CW keying with v 2.054 & 2.055 using Acom 2000 (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 09:43:51 EST
I think I know what's wrong... Maybe... I noticed with OII and my Alpha 91b that if I watch the power output LEDs that there is a very short duration spike in the power when the TX goes on off. If I
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00306.html (8,814 bytes)

325. Re: [TenTec] Heil PSQP and Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 09:45:24 EST
Yaseu
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00307.html (6,840 bytes)

326. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.055 problem? (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 09:51:16 EST
Yep, That's the QSK keying bug you have
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00308.html (6,742 bytes)

327. Re: [TenTec] observations of my Orion with V 1.372 (better yet 1.371) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:03:38 EST
Buck, Thanks for the update to us all. PLEASE sent all this to Dits n Bits if you have not already done so. Thanks agai. Unfortunately us OII owners are STUCK. we can not go back to 1.XXX at all. TT
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00327.html (7,886 bytes)

328. Re: [TenTec] observations of my Orion with V 1.372 (better yet 1.371) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:20:33 EST
Buck, Yep, that's all true. The manual never keeps up. DitsnBits DOES get the info and they do look at it. An Auto reply is normal for them. Unfortunately it is a one way street. I personally think t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00340.html (7,946 bytes)

329. Re: [TenTec] Xmit VFO A/B switching glitch or by design - Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:21:34 EST
That's a bug. Lee
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00341.html (7,254 bytes)

330. Re: [TenTec] observations of my Orion with V 1.372 (better yet 1.371) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:24:04 EST
Very disturbing... to take something that works pretty darn well in version 1.371 and comepletely screw it up,,,, WHY??? TT Why? Maybe Hams are not doing the testing? Lee, KC9CDT
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00343.html (7,672 bytes)

331. Re: [TenTec] Observatons (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:27:31 EST
This can't be rocket science.... Lets see... I have a 1.371 that works pretty darn well ( yes some specific areas need work) and I STILL have the code in my hot little hand... Now I have a V2.XXX tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00345.html (7,894 bytes)

332. Re: [TenTec] Observatons (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:54:03 EST
I am very pleased with the OII Hardware....Very frustrated as to why the firmware had to have some of these 'obvious issues' After all TT has come a long way from very early Orion ( I got mine in Nov
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00352.html (8,066 bytes)

333. Re: [TenTec] Version 1.373b3 Now Available (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:10:55 EST
Question, how in the world did that code get there? I thought RF squared was the TT outlet for code? Too bad I can't go back to 1.371 or 1.xxx 73, Lee
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00396.html (7,713 bytes)

334. Re: [TenTec] 253 Tuner --- (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:24:56 EST
A lesson to be learned, don't be too anxious to sell something... until you have done your homework. Once you set a price, IMHO you should honor it... Just the way I do business. It's a personal deci
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00426.html (7,854 bytes)

335. Re: [TenTec] Even More Anecdotal NR observations -- Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:41:28 EST
I had a little more time yesterday to experiment with NR. My feeling now is it is working better than I originally thought, even though I hope it goes back to more like 1.371 still. Now I see why I a
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00427.html (7,993 bytes)

336. [TenTec] Would like a sched with someone (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:22:27 EST
I would like to really figure out my audio settings with OII using Heil Classic, studio and HC-5 elements. Looking for someone to meet me on 20 mtrs this afternoon. I will be glad to assist with your
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00437.html (6,867 bytes)

337. Re: [TenTec] Orion/Orion II Firmware (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 08:31:36 EST
AND be sure we send the detailed issues to DitsnBits. This is the kind of details they need, so they can recreate the problem. I was in the service area at IBM for many years and really appreciated t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00455.html (6,996 bytes)

338. [TenTec] Sweep on OII (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:27:31 EST
Working some DX working split this am.... Is it my imagination or was the OII with it's faster dragonball CPU supposed to allow the sweep to work better? When I tune the sweep stops. Granted at least
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00540.html (8,153 bytes)

339. Re: [TenTec] Sweep on OII (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 21:20:56 EST
IMHO it is very important to be able to change freq quickly while watching the sweep. Great for just jumping on a signal you want to go check outand especialy for split DX. I hope the feature comes o
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00567.html (8,724 bytes)

340. Re: [TenTec] Sweep on OII (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:44:33 EST
IMHO the OII sweep is very nice, and it works well except when you start tuning fast it stops completely. It would be much more useable if it kept running just as fast when you tune.. Much, much bett
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00572.html (8,865 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu