Mail Archive Search: <+from:kc9cdt@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:kc9cdt@aol.com: 561 ]

Total 561 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Model 318 Amplifier Key Interface (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:47:50 -0500 (EST); So...a delay before the xcvr starts to send?? That way we do not have hot switching? 73, Lee I'm a little confused by the following statement. Does this mean that I will be able to use my Omni VI+ ru; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-01/msg00314.html (7,887 bytes)
62. Re: [TenTec] Oll & RF @mic input. (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:33:48 -0500 (EST); Yes...I remember now...changing the wiring on the Heil mic connector for the OII. I think it was to have shield to the chassis and it was not before. No issues here running full power on all bands. 7; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-01/msg00318.html (10,827 bytes)
63. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 query L/S on 2nd receiver. (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:18:14 -0500 (EST); I agree...I usuually set my RF gain just at the noise level...works super...just like using a Boat Anchor RX.....back when we actually had to use RF gain to make it work well 73, Lee One more thing..; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00079.html (13,371 bytes)
64. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+, VII, or Orion for next rig. Can't decide (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:32:54 -0500 (EST); Spend your money 1st...on antennas..then a great radio. I love my TT OII. And I love my Sherwood Drake C line. 73, Lee, kc9cdt --Original Message-- From: Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP <Rick@DJ0IP.de> To: floy; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00126.html (14,805 bytes)
65. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:03:15 -0500 (EST); They make my ears hot...so I hate them, 73, Lee Well,now, I think someone aught to wear a HEADSET and then you don't hear any damn clacking reed relays ............... Walt K8CV Royal Oak, MI. "Laiss; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00156.html (36,781 bytes)
66. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:13:45 -0500 (EST); So...guys...what does TT say about this? Just call Paul Clinton and ask. Meanwhile I am going to check mine out tonight...(I am just getting ready to re-learn so to speak CW) 73, Lee There is no "do; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00208.html (11,302 bytes)
67. Re: [TenTec] Antenna-Analyzer (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:19:32 -0500 (EST); How good is it? How does it compare to the MFJ stuff? 73, Lee TEN-TEC is the exclusive US distributor for the YouKits Antenna-Analyzer take a look at http://www.tentec.com/products/FG%252d01-Antenna-; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00210.html (8,626 bytes)
68. Re: [TenTec] Antenna-Analyzer (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:07:01 -0500 (EST); What about the basic AA-30 model. It's more in my $$ range. 73, Lee I purchased the rig expert 230Pro and have not used it for my big test project yet I have played with it and checked my antennas in; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00230.html (10,412 bytes)
69. Re: [TenTec] Antenna-Analyzer (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:25:10 -0500 (EST); Casey, AH...good info. I'll get the 54. Thanks & 73, Lee I have the AA-54 model and love it. So glad to get rid of that clunker MFJ-259. Note, though, that the AA-30 doesn't do multi-band SWR, so if; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00232.html (12,060 bytes)
70. Re: [TenTec] Antenna-Analyzer (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:52:47 -0500 (EST); Oh Yeah...baby. Sweet for sure. 73 Lee Lee Simmonds Summit DCS LLC 260-799-4077 Office 260-403-6936 Cell You won't regret it. I recently tuned a 2 elt quad and the thing is so light I just hung it; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00234.html (13,997 bytes)
71. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:36:42 -0500 (EST); I for one hate QSK.. It is very iritating to hear RX noise between chars & words. I use good old fashioned semi_break in. 73, Lee At the risk of being labeled a "lid" - is there a handy explanation o; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00251.html (11,375 bytes)
72. Re: [TenTec] Antenna-Analyzer (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:38:16 -0500 (EST); Yep, I agree the AA54 is the way for me to go since I have many multi-band antennas. 73, Lee Lee Simmonds Summit DCS LLC 260-799-4077 Office 260-403-6936 Cell I think the AA-54 model is the best de; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00252.html (12,553 bytes)
73. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:19:16 -0500 (EST); Carl, Yes...some ops have no kuth at all. I call 1 time & listen! happens a lot on SSB too. Just today...a DX station ask for the 9 station only and I bet 4 others kept calling. I guess they get thro; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00257.html (13,360 bytes)
74. Re: [TenTec] Antenna-Analyzer (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:51:09 -0500 (EST); Question, Is it OK to use ant of the HH analysers from the shack using the normal feedline? OR do I have to be right at the antenna....? 73, Lee Rick -- You seem to be laboring under a misconception.; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00293.html (10,609 bytes)
75. Re: [TenTec] Antenna-Analyzer (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:09:47 -0500 (EST); AA-54 looks like the way to go...multi-band SWR at the same time. 73, Lee Anywhere on the feedline, doesn't matter. Good to use it at the antenna if you can and then you can compare at the shack to s; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00295.html (12,532 bytes)
76. Re: [TenTec] Antenna-Analyzer (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:31:20 -0500 (EST); OK, I understand... Thanks,Joe, Lee Lee, There is nothing wrong with taking readings at the bottom of the transmission line, you just need to understand what they really mean. If you have a reasonabl; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00297.html (12,914 bytes)
77. Re: [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418? (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:57:40 -0400 (EDT); I would rather it have 6 than 160 IF I have to have one or the other... 73, Lee I will admit I have listened on 160 a few times but that is about it! I couldn't care less if the radio did not have 16; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00094.html (12,003 bytes)
78. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 19:09:34 -0400 (EDT); It's a matter of principal for me... If ARRL does not re-do the OII test using the new rules, I will not be re-newing my subscription. If they want to re-do the others that would be the right thing t; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00032.html (12,876 bytes)
79. Re: [TenTec] Count to Ten B4 Cussing Ten Tec (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 21:04:52 -0400 (EDT); All you have to do is get the correct Polyphaser stuff, do the grounds correctly and you have a very minumum risk...almost 0 (never 0). Most don't even have close to the correct grounding and surge s; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00152.html (13,863 bytes)
80. Re: [TenTec] new RX366 sub receiver (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:46:39 -0400 (EDT); ORION 3 ?????? What Orion 3? 73, Lee Current plan is, the new RX366 will be available as: 1 - You purchase a kit, install yourself. Fairly simple. Remove top/bottom, remove tmps to current A6 sub rec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00442.html (9,082 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]