Mail Archive Search: <+from:kd2e@comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:kd2e@comcast.net: 377 ]

Total 377 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Re: Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 08:02:06 -0400; Uh...no, Actually, not a thing has changed. The Orion is still out of reach for many, and the Icom and Yaesu prices are just comical! ...Dave -- Original Message -- From: <al_lorona@agilent.com> To:; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00273.html (9,689 bytes)
62. Re: [TenTec] Re: Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 08:14:24 -0400; Well, you could mount the circuit boards on two strips of 1 X 3, and wrap some friction tape around the knob shafts instead of those expensive knobs. Same performance. The amount of 'pretty stuff' re; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00274.html (14,094 bytes)
63. Re: [TenTec] It just depends... (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:27:25 -0400; I am still in the process of deciding! I am fascinated by smooth, seemless QSK. I have not had smooth, seemless QSK since the Old Swan twins (600's). You could switch the antenna with a Johnson TR sw; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00340.html (10,929 bytes)
64. [TenTec] Anyone live in SD ?? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:46:46 -0400; Any hams on the list from South Dakota? If so, could you contact me off the list? I had a few questions about SD Thanks.....Dave _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Te; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00699.html (6,731 bytes)
65. Re: [TenTec] OT: Go Lance Go (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 17:59:56 -0400; I think his shack would be full of Icoms! Why is this here anyway?? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00523.html (7,794 bytes)
66. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ destined as a classic? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:10:18 -0400; Well, years ago, I was shopping to replace my lowly FT757GX. I wanted to check out the OMNI V, but couldn't. (mail guarantee thing that I did not want to bother with). So, I picked up a Kenwood 850S.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00580.html (9,030 bytes)
67. Re: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ destined as a classic? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:05:14 -0400; I have since sold it..and the 440sat I had at the same time. But, it was a very solid, reliable rig. I never had to refer to the manual when operating. On SSB receive...it sounded beautiful...closest; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00584.html (12,590 bytes)
68. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ destined as a classic? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:20:23 -0400; Some people may not mind a big honking external contact Potter & Brumfield smacking away while they are sending. To me...any sound of a relay equates to non QSK. The Omni VI+ relay (not the external; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00596.html (10,637 bytes)
69. Re: [TenTec] Inquiry: Street Value for Omni IV+ ...? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:31:48 -0400; You mean VI+?? ...Dave -- Original Message -- From: <murphman@erols.com> To: <TenTec@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:21 AM Subject: [TenTec] Inquiry: Street Value for Omni IV+ ...? D; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00924.html (8,011 bytes)
70. Re: [TenTec] Basic question - Long (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 07:32:23 -0400; Steve... I see it as the distinction between shopping for months for about 15 boxes of pieces and parts, and then spending another month on the phone with help desks (that for all practical purposes,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00054.html (14,073 bytes)
71. [TenTec] Argo V users?? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 20:38:10 -0400; To anyone with an Argo V..... Have you gotten the transmit audio to sound ok? Before I bought mine, I saw a lot of negative input regarding the transmit quality on eham. Sure enough, when I got mine; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00381.html (6,716 bytes)
72. Re: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 06:43:19 -0400; Would it be a better test to turn the AGC's off?? ...Dave -- Original Message -- From: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 6:31 AM Subject:; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00575.html (9,689 bytes)
73. Re: [TenTec] cw cd (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:42:39 -0400; I checked... it must be a little sick. It came up, but took a long time. ...Dave -- Original Message -- From: "Richard Hemingway" <rheming1@sbcglobal.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, Au; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00579.html (8,225 bytes)
74. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 23:13:17 -0400; I think the vast majority of CW ops do NOT prefer QSK. But, perhaps the vast majority of those subscribed to a TenTec list do. Also, I think very few hams use VOX. ...Dave -- Original Message -- From; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00673.html (7,755 bytes)
75. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:05:56 -0400; Wrong. I suspect the hams that are in to contesting, and mark the contests off on the calendar use VOX, but the majority of hams do not use VOX. I've been on Field day every year since the SB102 days; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00684.html (12,766 bytes)
76. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:38:42 -0400; So you've established that you prefer QSK. So do I! The original post said "the majority of cw ops prefer QSK" Which I still hold is far from correct. There is life outside TenTec, and the average Ya; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00687.html (9,830 bytes)
77. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:24:34 -0400; Jim... You're biased!! Look at your rig list... Two Ten Tec amps, Two Ten Tec rigs..and a K2 QSK Heaven!! I just picked up an FT897D rig last week at HRO. I gave it a try in QSK mode... Ain't gonna h; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00694.html (10,746 bytes)
78. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:33:09 -0400; But someone is a 'LID' if they are dxing without QSK?? were those the radio fail)? a much noise FT100D full aren't _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00705.html (11,744 bytes)
79. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ picture (rear) wanted (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:30:25 -0400; Mine came with a line drawing of the back panel so you could find connectors while standing over it. I'll look around and see if I can find it. ....Dave -- Original Message -- From: <Able2fly@aol.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00878.html (7,283 bytes)
80. Re: [TenTec] Re: TT current production QSK rigs? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:45:06 -0400; If the price is right, you will be happy with the Omni VI+ The Orion may be an outstanding rig, but I weigh the amount of questions about its characteristics I've heard vs. the price and went with an; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00968.html (8,656 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]