Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net: 666 ]

Total 666 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TenTec] managing shortwave listening OII (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:25:33 -1000
Hi Grant, Actually, I didn't say you said that R-390s have push-pull anythings. Thanks for the info on SP-600 AF PA. Anyway, I think we both have similar tastes in receivers. I started with a BC-779
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00697.html (8,843 bytes)

162. Re: [TenTec] managing shortwave listening OII (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:24:56 -1000
Oops. That was not supposed to go to the list. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00698.html (8,098 bytes)

163. Re: [TenTec] Remote rig operations (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:17:15 -1000
Hi Rob, I agree with you, yet can see both (or many ) sides of the issue. I personally want to turn the tuning knob myself. I use a computer for logging, with interface for frequency data to the comp
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00705.html (10,614 bytes)

164. Re: [TenTec] reflectors (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:24:58 -1000
On any email reflector there is likely to be either: A) Discussion threads that you are not interested in, or you feel are off topic or B) Such strict "moderation" that the discussions posted are so
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00753.html (9,652 bytes)

165. [TenTec] Filter information (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:05:24 -1000
Hi Jerry, I suspect the the filter with 8043 on one of the crystals is a stock number 48243, model number 221. Either print is smudged on your filter to make the 2 look like a 0, or there is a typogr
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00060.html (7,580 bytes)

166. Re: [TenTec] Paragon 585 noise level (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 17:41:36 -1000
Is the audio noise noise output high, with no antenna connected, or just the S meter reading? Close you eyes or don't look at the S meter, and listen to whether the receiver is working normally. Try
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00143.html (8,238 bytes)

167. [TenTec] Electric stove controls (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 12:50:39 -1000
This is completely off topic, except that it is in a general sense about the production or RFI or the lack thereof. If you are one of those people whose blood pressure rises when you see a question t
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00179.html (7,304 bytes)

168. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Pass Band Tuning CW Narrow (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:55:12 -1000
Hi John, The 9 MHz IF bandpass center frequency does NOT get shifted by the PBT control. The PBT control shifts a VCXO on the Passband Tuning Board. This 15.3 MHz VCXO converts the 9 MHz IF down to 6
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00379.html (12,757 bytes)

169. Re: [TenTec] Correction: Omni VI Pass Band Tuning CW Narrow (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 14:10:42 -1000
NARROW _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00380.html (14,551 bytes)

170. Re: [TenTec] ORION II ver. 2.038k RIT? XIT? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:29:12 -1000
+ or - 10 what? MHz, kHZ, Hz? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00581.html (7,711 bytes)

171. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 07:40:38 -1000
Hi Merv, When I first got an OmniVI, I too noticed birdies, with a 50 Ohm termination and no antenna connected. I compared what I heard on the Omni VI to my previous "main" rig, a Kenwood TS-440. Wha
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00258.html (9,281 bytes)

172. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII meter. (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 11:39:02 -1000
Hi Mark, I don't have an Omni VII, so I cannot give you an authoritative answer. I do have an idea though. It is a sort of "divide by zero problem". With an old fashioned SWR bridge, where you have t
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00274.html (8,065 bytes)

173. Re: [TenTec] AUX Keying OminiVI Plus (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:03:50 -1000
Or if you don't want even the tiny click of a reed relay (someone has claimed it is not true QSK if you can hear a relay click) you could use an optocoupler. LED in optocoupler only needs a few mA, n
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00429.html (8,914 bytes)

174. Re: [TenTec] cw practice (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 13:50:21 -1000
Plenty of callsigns and serial numbers at various speeds to be copied on all the HF contest bands this weekend. WPX. DE N6KB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00440.html (8,466 bytes)

175. Re: [TenTec] AUX Keying OminiVI Plus (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 11:52:39 -1000
Hi Paul and group, That is fine with me, however.... That depends on your definition of QSK. There was a discussion thread here, probably years ago, wherein some expressed that by their own personal
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00467.html (10,007 bytes)

176. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 53, Issue 35 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 12:13:25 -1000
Hi Jim, Connecting up the Omni VI, Hercules II and 253 autotuner (I presume, because that is the only Ten-Tec autotuner I know of) according to the Ten-Tec manuals ought to work, with no damage to an
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00468.html (9,385 bytes)

177. Re: [TenTec] How to adjust frequency display on OMNI V? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 07:14:24 -1000
I have an Omni VI, so to apply this to the Omni V assumes that it is very similar to the Omni VI. I don't know this for sure, so beware. In the Omni VI the "VFO" is a combination of a PLL synthesize
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00498.html (8,627 bytes)

178. Re: [TenTec] CW Tuning with Omni 6 Plus (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:19:49 -1000
When two tones (RF or audio) are at exactly the same frequency, they are "zero beat" with each other. They could be at any phase relation to each other, so the amplitude of the sum of the two could b
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00008.html (9,515 bytes)

179. Re: [TenTec] CW Tuning with Omni 6 Plus (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 08:50:22 -1000
Or just by doing it. Even if you don't know or understand what is going on, it is easy to recognize that there is a beat note and that you can adjust one tone source relative to the other and hear t
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00030.html (9,078 bytes)

180. Re: [TenTec] CW Tuning with Omni 6 Plus (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:51:03 -1000
Yep. And if the sidetone frequency is truly equal to the CW transmit offset from receive frequency zero beat (that is zero beat with the BFO, not with the sidetone), then your transmitted signal wil
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00048.html (9,528 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu