Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net: 666 ]

Total 666 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [TenTec] LEGAL LIMIT PLUS AMP ALPHA 77D (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:23:29 -1000
I don't know which Titan K4TAX is referring to, since there have been at least three incarnations of the Titan, with a few versions of each, having minor changes as the design evolved. (At least that
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00069.html (10,669 bytes)

282. Re: [TenTec] LEGAL LIMIT PLUS AMP (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:22:38 -1000
Hi All, Excuse me if I inadvertently said "100%" duty cycle. What I meant to say was "high duty cycle". In contesting, if you're serious about being competitive in the contest, you will be transmitti
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00090.html (10,329 bytes)

283. Re: [TenTec] 425 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:47:35 -1000
Hi Scott, I don't want to be argumentative either, however.... If: "1500 watts even on digital modes for contest use does not present a problem." Then why: "The amp is rated 1000 watts output on RTTY
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00136.html (9,484 bytes)

284. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:25:44 -1000
Darrell makes some real good points regarding efficiency. Many "wideband" or "multiband" antennas claim low SWR over wide frequency ranges or multiple bands, and in fact they often live up to that cl
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00146.html (9,988 bytes)

285. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:37:06 -1000
Oops. I should have said "too good to be true" _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00147.html (7,902 bytes)

286. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238A settings? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:36:34 -1000
My highest antenna is a folded monopole. So the whole thing is connected to ground and the ground radial system, with about 100 feet of coax between that ground system and the shack. I have another m
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00174.html (10,676 bytes)

287. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:26:48 -1000
It is difficult to tell which line of answer boxes corresponds to which question, because they are so far apart horizontally. If there were more horizontal lines on the survey pages to help the eye f
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00231.html (8,163 bytes)

288. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:35:42 -1000
The blue and white background stripes really are an improvement. Thanks for listening! DE N6KB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00286.html (10,245 bytes)

289. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:22:53 -1000
Writing a survey can be a complicated task. The questions need to be carefully written to gather the information wanted, while keeping the number of questions reasonable. With "check the most appropr
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00288.html (11,512 bytes)

290. [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:44:26 -1000
Is there any validity to the notion that deleting CW functionality from a rig could make it cheaper? Let's see, what additional parts are needed to make a SSB capable rig operate in CW mode? For rece
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00378.html (10,771 bytes)

291. Re: [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:46:13 -1000
Hi Geoffrey, I have never had any trouble receiving CW with a 2.4 kHz wide, or wider IF bandwidth. And were talking about the additional cost of making the rig CW capable, versus SSB only. We're not
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00381.html (15,415 bytes)

292. Re: [TenTec] Cheap rig (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:49:50 -1000
Hi Rick, I think you make an excellent point. Only an experienced ham or possibly a new ham who is getting good guidance from an experienced ham would buy this kit. A new ham (or ham to be) would mos
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00400.html (9,702 bytes)

293. Re: [TenTec] Cheap rig (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:38:54 -1000
If you have a 455 kHz IF, for SSB you'll need a 455 kHz or thereabouts BFO. If that BFO were a digitally synthesized affair, it would not be a big deal to have it operate at a second frequency for C
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00402.html (8,959 bytes)

294. [TenTec] Omni VI TX power low on one band (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:44:40 -1000
My Omni VI has lower than normal TX power output on 160 meters. All the other bands seem fine. On 160 meters the power is quite a bit higher when I go up to 2.3 MHz (the top end of the Omni VI capabi
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00429.html (7,489 bytes)

295. Re: [TenTec] FS: Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:48:55 -1000
Hi Don, That sideband selection when running "AM" really is a selection. You only transmit the sideband selected. It is really SSB with a reinserted carrier. It does not transmit DSB AM. When receivi
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00443.html (7,223 bytes)

296. [TenTec] Omni VI PA and Lowpass Filter board access (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:54:15 -1000
Hi all, I'm getting into my Omni VI to try to find why the TX power is low on 1.8 MHz, but not so low on 2.3 MHz. I ant to look at the TX PA and the Lowpass Filter Board. Having removed both the top
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00448.html (7,438 bytes)

297. [TenTec] Sticky, goopy stick-on feet (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:07:58 -1000
Yuck! My Omni VI had some extra stick-on feet. Looks like a previous owner may have used a narrow shelf, and had the back of the rig hanging over, necessitating the extra feet a few inches forward of
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00450.html (7,943 bytes)

298. Re: [TenTec] Century 21 problem (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:39:06 -1000
Is that the CW tone of the transmitted signal, as heard on a separate receiver? Or is it the CW sidetone generated by the Century 21 that has the warble? Or perhaps both? ____________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00460.html (7,479 bytes)

299. [TenTec] New hams (doesn't matter what generation) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:52:58 -1000
New hams have not had time to learn how to get their CW signal zero beat to a received one they intend to QSO. Even if the radio has a properly working method to know where your CW signal is going to
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00530.html (8,829 bytes)

300. Re: [TenTec] New hams (doesn't matter what generation) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:15:57 -1000
I'd say any of those options would be fine for a new ham to make CW QSOs. 2.8 kHz would be better than 15 kHz, and since this rig "is being targeted at hams with NO CW skills, and probably no desire
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00532.html (9,461 bytes)

Current List: 281 - 300
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu