- 361. Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 15:17:55 -1000
- One more point, any well designed broadcast or commercial transmitter installation is going to include some type of output filtering in the transmission line, or at least some form of interference re
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00364.html (10,126 bytes)
- 362. Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 21:48:13 -1000
- Long story short: if you're concerned that RF will give you cancer, don't be. With all the folks walking and driving around with cell phones stuck on their ears, if RF could kill you, half the nation
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00393.html (9,726 bytes)
- 363. [TenTec] Omni VI problems, continued (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 21:46:44 -1000
- Hi all, My Omni VI is not producing full power on all bands. I have not fixed it yet, though I am probably closer to understanding the problem than I was when I last posted to the reflector about it.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00525.html (12,064 bytes)
- 364. [TenTec] Omni VI problems, continued (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 19:10:04 -1000
- Hi all, Changing C19 on the XTAL OSC LO MIXER BOARD did not make any big change in the power output, and I can still hear a periodic "relocking" sound when on 30 meters (maybe on other bands too). By
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00593.html (9,894 bytes)
- 365. Re: [TenTec] Coax connectors (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 22:08:37 -1000
- Hi Marinus, The male "UHF" connector is a PL-259 and the female is SO-239. At MF and HF they are fine if they are quality versions and are installed correctly and kept clean and dry. You see a lot of
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00628.html (10,504 bytes)
- 366. Re: [TenTec] Coax Connectors (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 10:19:40 -1000
- Wonder what you think of the TNC, seem to be used a lot in the labs, together with BNC and N. BNC, TNC and N connectors are identical on the inside. That is, the center "hot lead" pin and the outer s
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00654.html (10,286 bytes)
- 367. Re: [TenTec] LEGAL LIMIT PLUS AMP ALPHA 77D (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:23:29 -1000
- I don't know which Titan K4TAX is referring to, since there have been at least three incarnations of the Titan, with a few versions of each, having minor changes as the design evolved. (At least that
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00069.html (12,447 bytes)
- 368. Re: [TenTec] LEGAL LIMIT PLUS AMP (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:22:38 -1000
- Hi All, Excuse me if I inadvertently said "100%" duty cycle. What I meant to say was "high duty cycle". In contesting, if you're serious about being competitive in the contest, you will be transmitti
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00090.html (10,558 bytes)
- 369. Re: [TenTec] 425 (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:47:35 -1000
- Hi Scott, I don't want to be argumentative either, however.... If: "1500 watts even on digital modes for contest use does not present a problem." Then why: "The amp is rated 1000 watts output on RTTY
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00136.html (9,730 bytes)
- 370. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:25:44 -1000
- Darrell makes some real good points regarding efficiency. Many "wideband" or "multiband" antennas claim low SWR over wide frequency ranges or multiple bands, and in fact they often live up to that cl
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00146.html (10,954 bytes)
- 371. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:37:06 -1000
- Oops. I should have said "too good to be true" If an antenna system's frequency or band coverage seems to good to be true, it may really be true, usually at the expense of poor efficiency on some or
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00147.html (8,209 bytes)
- 372. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238A settings? (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:36:34 -1000
- My highest antenna is a folded monopole. So the whole thing is connected to ground and the ground radial system, with about 100 feet of coax between that ground system and the shack. I have another m
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00174.html (10,796 bytes)
- 373. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:26:48 -1000
- It is difficult to tell which line of answer boxes corresponds to which question, because they are so far apart horizontally. If there were more horizontal lines on the survey pages to help the eye f
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00231.html (9,539 bytes)
- 374. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:35:42 -1000
- The blue and white background stripes really are an improvement. Thanks for listening! DE N6KB It is difficult to tell which line of answer boxes corresponds to which question, because they are so fa
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00286.html (10,116 bytes)
- 375. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:22:53 -1000
- Writing a survey can be a complicated task. The questions need to be carefully written to gather the information wanted, while keeping the number of questions reasonable. With "check the most appropr
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00288.html (11,485 bytes)
- 376. [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:44:26 -1000
- Is there any validity to the notion that deleting CW functionality from a rig could make it cheaper? Let's see, what additional parts are needed to make a SSB capable rig operate in CW mode? For rece
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00378.html (12,285 bytes)
- 377. Re: [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:46:13 -1000
- Hi Geoffrey, Wrong. You are assuming that a narrow SSB filter, which COULD be, WOULD be. Quite simply it would not. So a user would be able to recieve CW in USB mode with a 2.4 kHz bandwidth. Possibl
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00381.html (17,241 bytes)
- 378. Re: [TenTec] Cheap rig (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:49:50 -1000
- Hi Rick, I think you make an excellent point. Only an experienced ham or possibly a new ham who is getting good guidance from an experienced ham would buy this kit. A new ham (or ham to be) would mos
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00400.html (10,261 bytes)
- 379. Re: [TenTec] Cheap rig (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:38:54 -1000
- It depends upon the price difference. Since the rig I imagined had a digital synthesizer as its signal source, it would have to be "pulled" to transmit. In plain English if you used a 455kHz IF (as c
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00402.html (9,210 bytes)
- 380. [TenTec] Omni VI TX power low on one band (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:44:40 -1000
- My Omni VI has lower than normal TX power output on 160 meters. All the other bands seem fine. On 160 meters the power is quite a bit higher when I go up to 2.3 MHz (the top end of the Omni VI capabi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00429.html (7,864 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu