Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net: 666 ]

Total 666 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] which power supplystation efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:21:04 -1000
kind of nice to have a fuse to limit the current to each transceiver to the maximum it needs, rather than allowing the full current capacity of the power supply (when that is larger than what one tra
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00085.html (10,143 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Noise Blanker Comparisons (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:40:21 -1000
This is a HUGE subject. I expect that most of the comments will be subjective descriptions of how well a noise blanker worked for a particular person in a particular location, on various kinds of noi
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00149.html (9,935 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI driver & final pa R&R (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:54:38 -1000
Hi Don, If you have discussed this before, I did not read it, or forgot it. I apologize if I'm pointing out things that you have already gone over. I would not change out any of those transistors unl
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00020.html (9,232 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:51:55 -1000
What kind of bandwidth do you get with your inverted L, 50 kHz? Would I still be able to use a tuner in the shack if I want to bend it for more coverage on 160? Define bandwidth. Do you mean SWR band
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00067.html (12,130 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 15:38:50 -1000
Hi J, That sounds like a very good setup and it would be hard to improve on it. The SWR should be low enough that using a tuner in the shack ( as opposed to some sort of matching network right at the
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00086.html (12,962 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:27:48 -1000
Without tricks, in order to have 38 Ohms on a 160m vertical, it would have to be 132 ft. high and have about 60 radials under it. I doubt that more than 2 or 3 people here have ever had or even used
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00089.html (10,166 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 13:49:35 -1000
That's a new one on me. How could loss be less with high SWR on a short length of coax? It makes no sense. The loss in coax at HF frequencies is not that high, and the additional loss due to high SWR
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00116.html (10,863 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:15:53 -1000
I recall that Swan made a motorized version of the sliding contact in the coil antenna. I saw one in the '70s. The Swan used a vertically sliding contact, not one that rotated around the coil to get
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00177.html (10,138 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] Reflector (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:41:43 -1000
I got that one from you. I have received very little (or none) from the reflector lately, so this will serve as a test. 73 ES HAPPY TNX GVNG DE N6KB First problem I have had in a long time but I am j
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00181.html (8,336 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Paragon II model 586, (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:55:56 -1000
The carrier is not in the middle of the passband of the filter, otherwise if so, one would have a DSB signal not a SSB signal Thus to swap sidebands, the BFO frequency must change to the opposite sid
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00001.html (8,387 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] Omni C + new Ham = Oops. (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:25:05 -1000
"I've had great success using my weller WTCP iron with a 35 watt element and a large chisel tip. and you need lots of solder wick. " A bigger (higher power) iron means more heat capacity and faster h
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00270.html (11,970 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] Omni C + new Ham = Oops. (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:27:31 -1000
Ebay MRF454: $70 for 2 unmatched -- china parts are marked "refurbished' not new, which kinda makes me take pause. Do not pause here. Turn around and run away. DE N6KB
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00271.html (10,218 bytes)

73. [TenTec] Working on PC board mounted RF power transistors (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:58:08 -1000
My Wellers are the models WP-40 and WP-25. My 'screwdriver tip' on the WP-25 is probably 1/32 across the rounded tip. I like Weller soldering irons too. There are so many kinds (of any brand) that it
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00359.html (10,920 bytes)

74. [TenTec] Paragon II no TX, then restored (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 07:57:16 -1000
I had my Paragon II opened up to clean all connectors and front panel potentiometers. Most connectors were unplugged, sprayed with DeOxit and plugged back in. When I put it all back together and trie
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00005.html (7,314 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] Antenna measurements (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 12:38:02 -1000
That's correct - it's charge acceleration and deceleration which causes radiation. If you take a long wire and terminate it in its characteristic impedance it will radiate - there doesn't need to be
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00217.html (11,913 bytes)

76. [TenTec] test (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:00:44 -1000
test
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00245.html (6,661 bytes)

77. [TenTec] Posts to reflector sent from webmail bouncing (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:04:37 -1000
I tried several times to participate in a discussion on the reflector today, and my emails bounced. I was sending them from a different computer, using webmail with the email address I am subscribed
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00246.html (7,122 bytes)

78. [TenTec] Electromagnetic Radiation and accelerating charge (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:08:31 +0000 (UTC)
Any time a charge is accelerated and electromagnetic field is produced. Maxwells equations say this, and I am saying this from the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. An RF current is constantly accelerat
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00266.html (7,910 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] Antenna measurements (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 03:05:23 +0000 (UTC)
Yes. Maxwell's equations say nothing about how long the conductor is. If there is charge acceleration, which there is if there is an AC current, then there is radiation.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00269.html (9,096 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] Antenna measurements (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 03:08:11 +0000 (UTC)
And any conductor with RF current flowing in it is an antenna, unless there are special conditions to make it not radiate (much) such as in transmission lines and faraday shields.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00270.html (9,334 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu