Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@verizon.net: 532 ]

Total 532 documents matching your query.

121. [TenTec] Wire Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 10:07:58 -1000
I have got used to the idea of buying factory built radios, and factory packed beam antenna kits. I don't think I'll ever get used to the notion of buying a factory made dipole or other wire antenna.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00295.html (8,221 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] vertical dipoles (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:53:38 -1000
With respect to the Cebik article: I agree that this is excellent information. However there is not much discussion about feedline current balance, and the effect of the ground being much closer to o
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00375.html (9,807 bytes)

123. Re: [TenTec] Omni six-- heat related IF gain problem (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:11:26 -1000
This is the first I've heard of anyone installing cooling fans in the Omni 6. Actually, this wasn't an uncommon topic a few years back. Personally, I found that my PBT settings were shifted dramatica
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00414.html (9,603 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits" (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:18:16 -1000
A vertical dipole with the feedline coming straight off of the side for at least 1/4 wavelength should have a near prefect circle/round pattern. This of course can be impacted by variations in ground
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00434.html (10,605 bytes)

125. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:45:38 -1000
There is also the TT SDR (Software Defined Radios) on 7.51 Khz at 6 PM Eastern. Wow! The 40 km band. What TT rigs work there?
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00471.html (8,019 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:07:34 -1000
My Paragons don't go down that low. I wanted to try to listen to SAQ on 17.2 kHz and found that my Paragon II only goes down to 99.9 kHz. When KPH was on the air last week, I used the Paragon II to h
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00487.html (10,218 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:45:29 -1000
Hi Perry, Great Information! Yes I checked out my Paragon II manual, and sure enough there is a control line which causes RX input RF to bypass the first amplifier stage only when in 0.100 - 1.7 MHz.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00513.html (9,934 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] Tuner for Centurion to balanced antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 22:24:56 -1000
But, you say you use 1.5 KW to a KW Matchbox? Didn't think they could handle it. Hi Greg, When the Johnson Kilowatt Matchbox was manufactured, the FCC rules for Amateur Radio transmitter power stated
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00514.html (11,828 bytes)

129. Re: [TenTec] Orion - Questions (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:00:45 -1000
I have some questions for those who have Orion documentation, or know a lot more about the Orion and may be able to confirm or deny a few of my perhaps naive assumptions. Here are my naive assumption
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00809.html (9,620 bytes)

130. [TenTec] Noise Blanker Operation (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:54:37 -1000
Hi Frank, A friend of mine was having a QRM problem on 160 meters, which he mistook as a problem with the really strong station's signal. I wrote him the following explaination of how most noise blan
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00810.html (10,825 bytes)

131. Re: [TenTec] FCC says CW dead? Naw... (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 09:45:35 -1000
For those that do operate CW, again, it won't make any difference. It will make a difference for those who do operate CW, because there are no CW exclusive sub-bands. All those new "Extras" who have
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00877.html (9,046 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] Return policy (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:42:37 -1000
I got called a Nazi. END OF THREAD.....END OF THREAD.....END OF THREAD.....END OF THREAD....
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00976.html (7,395 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] Why smart people defend bad ideas (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 18:28:40 -1000
Thanks Bob. I enjoyed that, and will save it, and no doubt forward it to several friends. DE N6KB
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00080.html (7,109 bytes)

134. Re: [TenTec] Keying Amp with my new Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 17:17:37 -1000
You may not even need to use the relay in the Omni VI to key the amplifier. The TX OUT line on the Omni VI which is used with Ten Tec amplifiers is connected to the open collector of Q11 (on the Cont
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00188.html (9,434 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ Metering issue (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:21:54 -1000
With the OMNI RF output set at 100W on a Bird watt meter the FWD meter on the OMNI jumps to 25W, then decays down to 10W over a couple seconds time. What does the Bird watt meter do? Stay at a consta
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00268.html (8,247 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI FILTERS (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 18:40:04 -1000
Hi Dale, I will tell you what I know about Omni VI IF filter possibilities. All Omni VI versions have a 15 kHz BW 2 pole crystal filter as the 1st filter in the 9 MHz IF. This filter is in the receiv
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00301.html (10,540 bytes)

137. Re: [TenTec] RE : Keying Amp with my new Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 22:13:10 -1000
Assuming the QRO amp is QSK capable will this permit the safe use of the RELAY OUT on the OMNI in "semi break-in" mode (i.e: slow QSK). Theres no way I'm going to want to mess with manual PTT in a cw
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00302.html (8,441 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] Voltages on 50 ohm Dummy Load (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:47:47 -1000
Hi Barry, You want to use the RMS voltage value to calculate the power using Power equals Voltage squared divided by resistance. However measuring the peak to peak AC voltage with an oscilloscope is
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00305.html (11,460 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] Voltages on 50 ohm Dummy Load (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 14:49:27 -1000
I measure the peak to peak value using my scope. Then power equals E squared divided by R. This is good enough for "government work". This is wrong! Using peak voltage instead of RMS voltage of the p
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00308.html (8,866 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] RE : Re: RE : Relay Keying Amp with my new Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 18:32:10 -1000
The HF-2500Dx does not have a TX EN "ready for transmit" output. As such I would have to assume the high speed switching employed in the amp is engineering to handle the exciter power on key up. -- O
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00320.html (8,359 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu