Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@verizon.net: 532 ]

Total 532 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [TenTec] 9420 Power Supply Question (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:25:35 -1000
Okay, now I get it. Any voltage about one PN junction forward breakdown lower than +REG will turn on Q1. So when turning the Omni VI on, zero volts will turn on the 9420. And when the 9420 is up, the
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00596.html (11,569 bytes)

222. Re: [TenTec] Re: Paragon (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 09:07:44 -1000
Paragon II. I like it very much, especially its ability to do 60 meters. It has a number of upgrades from the Paragon I. If you have your choice and want to control by computer, use FM, and gain a nu
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00627.html (7,566 bytes)

223. Re: [TenTec] INRAD Omni VI roofing filter kit - success (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:29:43 -1000
Hi Jason, But to answer your question as to why I do not have any filters in the NAR slot it is primarily because every filter i've put in there has had more than 2 S-units of signal attenuation - I
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00870.html (10,372 bytes)

224. Re: [TenTec] INRAD Omni VI roofing filter kit - success (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:43:17 -1000
Hi Jason, But to answer your question as to why I do not have any filters in the NAR slot it is primarily because every filter i've put in there has had more than 2 S-units of signal attenuation - I
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00871.html (10,323 bytes)

225. Re: [TenTec] Models of OMNI V and VI (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:40:16 -1000
Hi Jim, I cannot tell you anything about the Omni V. I do have some information on the OmniVI. Here is what I understand are the various versions of Omni VI: 563 Omni VI = The basic Omni VI 563 Omni
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00973.html (9,324 bytes)

226. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI CI-V Address (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:36:33 -1000
1200 baud and C-Id is 04, according to my manual. Does anyone know what the default CI-V address and default serial baud rate is for the Omni VI is? DE N6KB
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01044.html (8,267 bytes)

227. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Pls CW hum (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:36:31 -1000
Jorge, Since you have made adjustments to PA circuitry, I am guessing that you hear this hum on your sidetone during transmit? Maybe it is a power supply problem. Perhaps the filter capacitors are go
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01059.html (8,048 bytes)

228. Re: [TenTec] Cheap Ferrites (was Orion reset) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:41:09 -1000
Is not the resistance dependant on the wire material (copper or other), cross section (gauge) and length, and not dependant on the core material? How can the core have an effect on resistance, other
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01063.html (9,895 bytes)

229. [TenTec] Omni VI Power output low (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:52:46 -1000
Hi all, I have an Omni VI. When first turned on the CW TX RF power output is nearly 100 watts, and then after being on for maybe an hour it is down to about 60 watts. I have not yet got inside to mak
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01143.html (8,008 bytes)

230. [TenTec] Inrad Omni VI roofing filter upgrade installation (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:43:08 -1000
Could someone please tell where to find pictures of this. It had been posted before, but I cannot seem to find it again. Thanks, Ken N6KB
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01150.html (7,138 bytes)

231. [TenTec] Fixed BFO freq = Fixed Beat Note (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:36:22 -1000
There has been a lot of discussion about Omni's 1st IF filters, and the CW audio note that we hear using them. I want to state the situation in a way that might help understand it. When we have a fil
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01184.html (10,121 bytes)

232. Re: [TenTec] Drake R4-B Sensitivity (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 18:46:30 -1000
Bill, Hopefully you mean uV and not mV if you are talking about receiver sensitivity. Even so, increasing sensitivity from 0.5 uV to 0.1 uV will probably only help on the higher HF bands, or when usi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00325.html (7,914 bytes)

233. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II vs Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:19:57 -1000
When the DSP noise reduction is not being used, the Omni VI+ is analog. Yes, there is digital control of many things in the Omni VI, however the signal path from antenna input to headphone output is
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00452.html (8,993 bytes)

234. Re: [TenTec] FS: Paragon II corrected filter info (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:19:06 -1000
That would be cycles/second. One of the reasons why they went to Hertz...lack of accuracy regarding frequency units. Chuck, KE9UW Yes Chuck is correct. cycles/second = Hertz and cycles = Hertz secon
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00583.html (8,444 bytes)

235. Hertz, was: [TenTec] FS: Paragon II corrected filter info (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:27:45 -1000
There are many people who go out of their way to use the term "cycles" or "kilocycles", etc. when describing frequency. They wouldn't dream of using Hertz or kiloHertz because Hertz doesn't mean anyt
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00600.html (8,628 bytes)

236. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:05:28 -1000
2. The OMNI VI passband tuning (PBT) is set so that you get a lot of "highs" (hiss) from the audio of the receiver. The carrier setpoints can do the same thing. The pair of 2.4 stock filters normally
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00676.html (12,431 bytes)

237. Re: [TenTec] XLR Connector Info Needed (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:53:28 -1000
hi Joe the "recessed" screw goes INTO the connector--which then slides out, OVER it, recessed...! AND it has reverse threads, so that you turn the screw the ususal direction for taking things apart,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00820.html (7,599 bytes)

238. Re: [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Yaesu/Inrad vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:46:38 -1000
Which is the speed needed to reach those key clicks with the keyer ??? Key clicks are a result of the leading and trailing edges of the keying envelope either being to steep or having overshoot and r
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00875.html (9,752 bytes)

239. Re: [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Yaesu/Inrad vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:54:51 -1000
Which is the speed needed to reach those key clicks with the keyer ??? Key clicks are a result of the leading and trailing edges of the keying envelope either being to steep or having overshoot and
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00881.html (10,499 bytes)

240. [TenTec] Re: Omni VI Roofing Filters (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:56:27 -1000
Where will this new Inrad roofing filter for the Omni VI go? In place of Y1 or in place of Y2? Changing Y2 will affect SSB TX, unless there is some kind of additional switching circuitry added. Or wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00939.html (7,593 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu