- 221. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:05:21 -1000
- If you just want to send text by keyboard, use some other digital method that works better. There isn't any such thing. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00797.html (9,720 bytes)
- 222. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:54:31 -1000
- Hi Adam, It depends on how you define "works better". If you define "works better" as: using the minimum bandwidth, getting through the noise better, being decodable using using just a receiver and a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00802.html (11,512 bytes)
- 223. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 09:36:36 -1000
- Duane A Calvin wrote: That's only because the K1/K3 don't do weight properly. Weight should be the ratio between the dit and dah length, not "on vs off" time in each element. 73, Duane I have always
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00806.html (10,508 bytes)
- 224. Re: [TenTec] Inquiry: Street Value for Omni IV+ ...? (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:56:14 -1000
- Dave Edwards wrote: If you can find an Omni IV either + or not, it would probably be a real collectors item, perhaps a one of a kind developmental rig. Omni VI are much more common. You mean VI+?? ..
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00937.html (8,678 bytes)
- 225. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Street Value sans sarcasm (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:17:02 -1000
- This is from the latest "used demo list" from Ten-Tec that I have seen posted on this reflector: 563/OPT3 Omni-VI factory upgrade to Omni-VI Plus $1395 564 Omni-VI Plus $1695 Nowhere in the message d
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00956.html (7,829 bytes)
- 226. Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 16:19:36 -1000
- The ClearSpeech unit analyzes the sound and does a very good job of removing any steady noise in about a second, hetrodynes included. It responds slow enough that it can be used with CW that isn't to
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00038.html (8,721 bytes)
- 227. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:25:32 -1000
- Mike Hyder -N4NT- wrote: Since we measure signal strength in volts and power in watts and since watts vary with the square of the voltage, are your 6dB per S-unit dB of voltage difference or of power
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00100.html (10,929 bytes)
- 228. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:32:49 -1000
- Mike Hyder -N4NT- wrote: If we're guessing, though, I'd say that doubling ones power would seem to more than double the received signal voltage. Maybe you're an engineer and can explain why it wouldn
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00101.html (9,087 bytes)
- 229. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:38:07 -1000
- Mike Hyder -N4NT- wrote: I suppose what I found confusing was any reference to impedance as it would seem to remain constant during our doubling of power. The aerials would be constant, the ether, to
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00102.html (9,110 bytes)
- 230. Re: [TenTec] Re: 100w mobile rig, etc. (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 18:17:19 -1000
- Jim Miller WB5OXQ wrote: I guess this is why when I ger on my Thursday night net on 3.972, mobile running 100 watts into a Little Tarheel 2 I am heard 200 miles away as loud or louder than most of th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00211.html (7,832 bytes)
- 231. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 18:58:19 -1000
- It is true that an analog S meter in a traditional rig with analog AGC is really indicating the AGC voltage. Does the AGC voltage follow signal strength in a direct signal voltage to AGC voltage 1:1
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00258.html (9,891 bytes)
- 232. [TenTec] Superhet Receiver Types? (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 22:31:45 -1000
- Hi Bob, I have a question about terminology. Do I have this right? A "single conversion superheterodyne receiver" that does not have a DSP detector has a 1st local oscillator that mixes the incoming
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00263.html (9,868 bytes)
- 233. Re: [TenTec] Superhet Receiver Types? (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 11:53:35 -1000
- Hi Mario, A BFO and a product detector perform frequency translation, IF to AF. So while "single conversion" receivers with only one LO and one IF and an AM detector are correctly called single conve
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00296.html (8,556 bytes)
- 234. Re: [TenTec] Re: NAR filter is OMNI-6 (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 12:27:49 -1000
- Roy Koeppe wrote: About, "I have an Omni VI with 2.4K, 1.8K, 500 and 250hz filters but the NAR slot is empty. Can someone tell me what I would add to the NAR filter for CW operation and why would I w
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00299.html (9,161 bytes)
- 235. Re: [TenTec] NAR filter in Omni VI (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 12:53:58 -1000
- Jason Buchanan wrote: Aha - I think I begin to understand now - in the Omni VI Opt.1 radio the default 2.4K filter "feeds" into the 1.8, 500 and 250hz filters, Yes, after the heterodyne conversion fr
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00300.html (8,167 bytes)
- 236. Re: [TenTec] NAR filter in Omni VI (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 16:28:41 -1000
- I don't see how changing the filter will affect clicks. Clicks are generated by rise times in the keying circuit. Others here can respond to that issue better than I. Many rigs key the transmitter in
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00304.html (8,789 bytes)
- 237. Re: [TenTec] QRP (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 07:06:44 -1000
- And since no specific time and frequency was given, it is hardly a prearranged QSO. DE N6KB NJ0IP wrote: No Barry, that's OK what he is doing. You are allowed to advertise your planned operations in
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00330.html (7,607 bytes)
- 238. Re: [TenTec] G3SJX IC-7800 review (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:12:29 -1000
- Depending on the amplifier, it may be possible to have your keyer output key the amp, and then the amplifer's "TX ready" output drive the transmitter keying input. Of course this method doesn't allow
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00419.html (9,460 bytes)
- 239. Re: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here? (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:17:52 -1000
- I'd like to see more discussion on this issue: 7. Compare and contrast 2-tube regen with Ten Tec Orion. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http:
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00420.html (8,978 bytes)
- 240. Re: [TenTec] Argo RF In to computer Speakers.. (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:30:01 -1000
- I use an Argo V into a TT Tuner and 450 0hm feed. There is nothing else in line., What do I need to do keep hearing myself in the external computer speakers? If I use the tiny internal computer speak
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00470.html (9,976 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu