Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@verizon.net: 532 ]

Total 532 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ destined as a classic? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:51:49 -1000
The Omni VI+ relay (not the external amp one) is plenty audible. Okay, I tried real hard, and yes I can hear the little reed relay in my Omni. I have to turn the receive audio down to zero, and then
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00627.html (9,580 bytes)

322. Re: [TenTec] Stupid Tech Question On Hookup Of Station (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:48:04 -1000
Hi Dan, It is likely that it will not make a difference, however having the test gear between the transmitter and the impedance matching unit would be my preference. Here's why: When you have your im
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00740.html (9,846 bytes)

323. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:05:21 -1000
If you just want to send text by keyboard, use some other digital method that works better. There isn't any such thing.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00797.html (9,504 bytes)

324. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:54:31 -1000
Hi Adam, It depends on how you define "works better". If you define "works better" as: using the minimum bandwidth, getting through the noise better, being decodable using using just a receiver and a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00802.html (11,546 bytes)

325. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 09:36:36 -1000
That's only because the K1/K3 don't do weight properly. Weight should be the ratio between the dit and dah length, not "on vs off" time in each element. 73, Duane I have always heard the "weight" ad
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00806.html (10,887 bytes)

326. Re: [TenTec] Inquiry: Street Value for Omni IV+ ...? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:56:14 -1000
You mean VI+?? ...Dave -- Original Message -- From: <murphman@erols.com> To: <TenTec@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:21 AM Subject: [TenTec] Inquiry: Street Value for Omni IV+ ...?
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00937.html (8,682 bytes)

327. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Street Value sans sarcasm (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:17:02 -1000
This is from the latest "used demo list" from Ten-Tec that I have seen posted on this reflector: 563/OPT3 Omni-VI factory upgrade to Omni-VI Plus $1395 564 Omni-VI Plus $1695 Nowhere in the message d
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00956.html (7,636 bytes)

328. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ memory LED question (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 19:24:27 -1000
Either I have a few burned out LED lights ..... Assuming the lights are burned out, does anyone know a part number for replacement bulbs and is it just a pop the front panel operation? They are not l
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00002.html (8,048 bytes)

329. Re: [TenTec] TEN TEC ITEMS FOR SALE (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:59:24 -1000
Bud's 282 filter has been spoken for. FOR SALE: The following items are from my Omni VI+, price includes shipping USA.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00012.html (7,023 bytes)

330. Re: [TenTec] Tranceiving accurately (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 08:45:32 -1000
Hi Bob, The reasons for transmit frequency to be different from receive frequency are as numerous as are transceiver designs. In many tranceivers the BFO is shifted in transmit mode and the balanced
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00067.html (10,619 bytes)

331. Re: [TenTec] Power supply for Orion? amperage? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 17:18:50 -1000
Read the specs on your Astron. An Astron 20 is NOT rated 20 amps continuous, but an Astron 35 is. Isn't marketing wonderful? Well, at least with the Astron stuff the specs are the specs and the model
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00084.html (8,233 bytes)

332. Re: [TenTec] Radials (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:23:49 -1000
If I could double my signal, as inexpensively as burying 60 extra pieces of the old wire I have laying around, I would most certainly do it in a heartbeat. If you've got the money and are willing to
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00182.html (8,692 bytes)

333. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Antennas (was Radials) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:31:37 -1000
The "nulls" are not really null. In my case, the southern null points at west MS, east TX, and I work everyone who is on there in the contests. Signal strengths are equal in the "nulls", regardless o
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00263.html (10,133 bytes)

334. Re: [TenTec] Re: Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:39:51 -1000
Joe HT....Another term I have heard is "the shack on a belt crowd"....I say if they are having fun with radio, good for them. There are all kinds of hams. Some can tell the difference in real perform
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00265.html (9,416 bytes)

335. [TenTec] Why I like my Ten-Tec (was: It just depends...) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:52:03 -1000
Why I use Ten-Tec rigs: First a list of rigs I have had before Ten-Tec: 1) Hammarlund BC-779 and two tube TX with plugin coils, built from 1968 handbook plans. 2) Heath SB-301 & SB-401, bought used,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00343.html (13,962 bytes)

336. [TenTec] Finished....depends. (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:41:33 -1000
I understand that Drake is finished with the R4, but a lot of hams are not. I understand that Yaesu is finished with most every radio after it leaves the factory, clicks or no. I understand that Ten-
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00411.html (6,838 bytes)

337. Re: [TenTec] VERY Interesting News... (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:27:40 -1000
A JA manufacturer fixing known problems in a whole production run of a rig, instead of only one at a time only after the buyer complains? That really is news!
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00561.html (7,361 bytes)

338. Re: [TenTec] E-Ham Bad Orion Review (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:37:02 -1000
I know some of the older generation are vehemently against putting up with any little glitches etc. that are common in most computer defined electronics of ALL kinds today. Well, maybe I am one "of t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00590.html (10,461 bytes)

339. Re: [TenTec] E-Ham Bad Orion Review (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:56:54 -1000
Hi Mike, There are many radios that have much better performance than the Drake 2b / 2BQ Heath DX-60 / HG-10, and do not get "stuck" and require rebooting or power cycling to start working again. So
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00606.html (10,137 bytes)

340. Re: [TenTec] E-ham Bad Orion Review (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:13:13 -1000
It shouldn't have to be a choice between performance and reliability in the price ranges of today's radios. You should get BOTH, "Right out of the box". I'll go back to observing threads now. 73. Tod
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00690.html (10,067 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu