Mail Archive Search: <+from:kevinpurcell@pobox.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:kevinpurcell@pobox.com: 94 ]

Total 94 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II & Omni V Filters (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:03:06 -0800; Gary: The TenTec Wiki is the best place for this ... all the info in one table (including the stock code for when the filter has no other markings!). <http://tentecwiki.org/doku.php?id=filters> You c; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00519.html (9,918 bytes)
82. Re: [TenTec] RS232 to USB for the Omni V? (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:07:34 -0800; The Keyspan adaptors are well supported in most modern OSes. In general any adaptor that uses the Prolific USB to serial chipset (i.e. Prolific Technology's PL-2303H/X/HX) will use the drivers in Mac; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00520.html (7,970 bytes)
83. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II & Omni V Filters (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:43:07 -0800; Look at the link I posted to the ten tec wiki on filters and my comment about the stock numbers. You can use the stock numbers to determine the filter model. There will often be two numbers on the fi; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00535.html (8,818 bytes)
84. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II PTO Problems (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:45:41 -0800; The Paragon (I and II) used a "normal" 4 octave PLL synthesized LO (with all the usual problems of increased phased noise) to get GC coverage. The Omni V (and VI) on the other hand used a narrow rang; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00567.html (10,341 bytes)
85. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II PTO Problems (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:03:55 -0800; See my post on the difference between the two. IMHO (and I think most of the nets HO too) the Omni V Better phase noise. Better crystal filtering close to the fist mixer (the advantage of a low IF co; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00613.html (11,115 bytes)
86. Re: [TenTec] OT: What doe FB mean (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:06:29 -0800; FB OM! I think of FB, HI and OM as emoticons of the telegraph age. We really need one to match :-( IH IH perhaps? What would you use on the air for "sadly"? 73 OM N7WIM On Nov 29, 2007, at 7:20 AM, B; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00614.html (9,597 bytes)
87. [TenTec] OT: First Class Radiotelegraph license (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 21:12:41 -0800; The problem with getting to First Class is you need time on the air using CW. And that doesn't happen any more what with GMDSS. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ham-Radio-History/message/10498? threade; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00079.html (9,693 bytes)
88. Re: [TenTec] Resolution of Omni V & Logic interfacing (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 13:45:04 -0800; The drivers for the Prolific USB to serial chip set are built into most OSes these day (Mac OS X, Linux, FreeBSD and Windows). So for a NoName device check to see if it is Prolific based. There are a; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00223.html (8,485 bytes)
89. Re: [TenTec] 40M Band Sweeps (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 13:40:44 -0800; ALE doesn't sweep it sends on particular (selected channels) for a given net in selected from a predetermined list and in conjunction with predictions from a propagation program. You can hear typical; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00224.html (10,646 bytes)
90. Re: [TenTec] Peter W. Dahl Company (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 13:58:01 -0800; My favorite X ray generator had a similar (though perhaps lower current) spec. "Contact with potentials in this equipment WILL cause death." I was most impressed with the certainty of the prediction!; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00225.html (8,839 bytes)
91. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII - I feel like such a n00b... (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 00:00:10 -0800; Except it sucks if you already have a network in place that has a zero in the second or third octets. It's a legal address (though it seems that the O7 assumes you have a "Class C" network, an odd as; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00256.html (12,668 bytes)
92. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:03:47 -0800; I've seen similar criticism in 1990s Technical Topics columns in RadCom. The 1N4007 does well on insertion loss, 2nd order IP and 3rd order IP but fails on isolation (worst case 35dB at 10m rather th; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00340.html (10,454 bytes)
93. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII QSK users with good ears.... (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:50:51 -0800; Actually I was thinking in terms of full reverse V across each diode. Just have to DC isolate each diode and provide the bias/reverse V separately for each one. No more complex that the shunt option; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00344.html (9,216 bytes)
94. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ receiver UHF intermod (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:09:18 -0800; Though to play the devil's advocate that if you do have a problem with something generating IMD in the front end (e.g. a flaky or poorly biased PIN diode or a connector with corrosion or whatever) th; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00402.html (9,624 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 94
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]