Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com: 131 ]

Total 131 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] RX 320D (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:07:15 -0800
burtiemail-webform@yahoo.com wrote: Anyone using the 320D? Wonder about your feelings regarding it's quality and functionality vs. other receivers you have used. Thanks, Burt Wizeman KI4FH Sarasota,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01234.html (8,876 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] Binaural CW for Tentec rigs - an easy way (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:24:14 -0800
Jeff, I downloaded Binster on your suggestion and with a 2.6 Gig Athelon processor system (Win XP Professional PC with 1.5 Gig RAM) the delay is still 'profound'. I am able to listen to input and out
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01235.html (9,459 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Rack Mounts? (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:40:03 -0800
W1GOR wrote: Bob, Novex lists the Tentec RX350. I believe the RX350 is similar in size to the Jupiter... http://www.novexcomm.com/ 73, Larry - W1GOR _______________________________________________ Te
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01254.html (9,269 bytes)

44. [TenTec] Paragon PLL OUT OF LOCK (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 06:24:23 -0800
Well the dreaded PLL OUT OF LOCK fault has struck! My Google search showed three recomendations. 1) See if the small variable resistor is out of adjustment on the Major Loop Board. This did not work.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00003.html (7,836 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec] Paragon PLL OUT OF LOCK (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 15:17:37 -0800
Well looks like the soldering approach is not going to work. Before you jump all over me please note that I am very good at that sort of thing. I even went so far as to remove the old solder, etc. I'
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00023.html (8,980 bytes)

46. [TenTec] Paragon PLL Problem Resolved.... anyone install 42 MHzTCXO in their Paragon? (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 00:53:30 -0800
Well after the easy repairs failed to repair I dug down and worked through the PLL circuits. That was fun. Anyway what I found was no varying control voltage the the Minor Loop boards VCO. This led m
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00032.html (7,493 bytes)

47. [TenTec] WTB: RS-232 serial interface for Paragon (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 19:08:06 -0800
Still looking. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00078.html (7,147 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] signal on 28.634 and other noises (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 06:10:05 -0800
I hear the same signals here at my location (near Berkeley, CA). Although very interesting they are really only small disturbances compared to some other 'garbage' that I am trying to trace out. Othe
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00133.html (9,245 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] I Love the "ORION"!!! I just bought one! (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:19:28 -0800
Jim Davis wrote: Question to anyone knowledgeable: Electrically what is the difference in performance between the three types of filters used today, namely the "Mechanical", the "Ceramic", and the so
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00181.html (12,434 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] Outer Space... getting back down to Earth. (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:23:47 -0800
Muldar and Scully might have their own take on all this. But even they might say enough is enough. Seriously though, from an amateur radio perspective it would be nice if we took this opportunity to
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00182.html (9,986 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] I Love the "ORION"!!! I just bought one! (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:28:39 -0800
Ouch, sorry about the misspellings and typos in that last one. Not enough sleep I suppose. Anyway the concepts are sound. Jerry _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00183.html (7,710 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] Noisy RF Environment (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:11:51 -0800
Phil Chambley, Sr. wrote: Pursuing Jerry's comment about noisy environs, several of the neighborhood kids got these battery-powered motor scooters for Christmas. The chargers are 24 volt switching su
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00188.html (8,903 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:25:37 -0800
When I was looking to buy an Omni VI Plus I called Ten-Tec and talked to the support engineer for the Omni's (name omitted). I was told that for all intents and purposes the Omni-VI with Option Pack
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00302.html (8,242 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] WTB: Omni 6+ (564); wide Inrad filters in N-1 or N-2slots (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:48:20 -0800
As the Omni-VI Plus 'cascades' (which is really a cool thing when you consider you get up to 16-poles of filtering at 9 MHz) the N-1 or N-2 filter behind the default 2.4 kHz 9 MHz filter putting the
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00338.html (9,735 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] From Omni 5 to Jupiter? (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:07:35 -0800
Able2fly@aol.com wrote: I am toying with the idea of trading in a perfectly good Omni V and replacing it with a Jupiter with antenna tuner, the reason being just to consolidate and simplify things a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00410.html (9,507 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] CW Audio tone... why not use a Binaural CW audio filter? (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:18:19 -0800
About two weeks ago I started a thread on using an external binaural audio filter to simulate stereo reception for CW. This was a very simple project to build and very effective in helping you 'separ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00411.html (9,707 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] Looking backward? The search for the 'Holy Ham Grail!' (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 05:50:26 -0800
"Looking backward...." Speaking as a former RF engineer with an eye toward the future but a pocket book firmly planted in today..... and having invested in and subsequently divested myself from SDR t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00430.html (10,443 bytes)

58. [TenTec] Binaural (Stereo) CW Redux! (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:04:39 -0800
Here is a replay of the essential info I placed on this reflector or sent to individuals who asked for more information (If you don't find what you are thinking about here look a few weeks back in th
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00434.html (13,589 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] Binaural (Stereo) CW Redux! Yes Orion has it... (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:43:28 -0800
useful in notion give it a try. I assume most know Binaural RX is included in Orion. Text and .wav example below: http://www.tentec.com/panoramic.htm 73, Bill W4ZV ___________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00439.html (8,414 bytes)

60. Re: [TenTec] Binaural (Stereo) CW Redux! (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:40:10 -0800
John L Merrill wrote: you were polite. don't you mean a sales gimmick? HI John N1JM Binaural or stereo CW is a different way of doing things. Not a gimmick. We have by necessity become conditioned to
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00451.html (9,346 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu