Mail Archive Search: <+from:kirschne@erols.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:kirschne@erols.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] S Meter Problem with Omni V (score: 1): Author: Frank Kirschner <kirschne@erols.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:28:29 +0000; Well, I assumed that if it were that simple, someone else would have made the adjustment. (Note to self: Don't assume.) You're absolutely right: all it took was adjustment. R45 was set at its highest; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00148.html (11,244 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] S Meter Problem with Omni V (score: 1): Author: Frank Kirschner <kirschne@erols.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:25:10 -0400; Good idea. I hadn't thought of that. What I did was adjust it to be about the same as the meter on my TS-480. I basically wanted it to go to (or near) zero with no signal, and not peg with any distan; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00162.html (10,353 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle and the legacy TTs (score: 1): Author: Frank Kirschner <kirschne@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:55:02 -0400; Re: General coverage vs. ham bands-only receivers. I recently did some extensive A/B testing with a Ten Tec Omni V and a Kenwood FT-480HX. On every signal - strong, weak, or in between - the Kenwood; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00334.html (11,205 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Information (score: 1): Author: Frank Kirschner <kirschne@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:39:53 -0400; I recommend you also put a piece of sticky tape behind the spot where the hole is going. That will help catch the fine metal shavings that drilling produces. Making random connections between PCB tra; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00497.html (9,784 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Omni V.9 (score: 1): Author: Frank Kirschner <kirschne@erols.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:30:29 -0400; Thanks, but his Web site indicates he no longer has the labels and can't get/make any more. Frank KK4PR _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http:; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00050.html (7,799 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Auto Tuners (score: 1): Author: Frank Kirschner <kirschne@erols.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:41:11 -0400; The first time I put 175 watts through my LDG AT-600Pro, it blew up. It's supposed to be rated at 600 watts. I use the MFJ-989, rated at 1500 watts. It works FB. Frank KK4PR _________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00052.html (9,467 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Auto Tuners (score: 1): Author: Frank Kirschner <kirschne@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 07:47:13 -0400; the tuner can easily exceed ratings at 100 watts. I have three autotuners, and they all specify a minimum of five watts for tuning. But they generally tune so quickly that it doesn't create much QRM.; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00084.html (9,518 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Comparison of Ten Tec Orion II with Flex 500A (score: 1): Author: Frank Kirschner <kirschne@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:50:35 -0400; All, I realize that the two are very different realizations of transceivers, but from an operating standpoint, does anyone have any experience or observations? The cost is about the same for the two; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00203.html (7,736 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]