Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:knesbitt@nucleus.com: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Sweep on OII (score: 1)
Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 21:51:21 -0700
Pretty much my question Toby. Possibly someone might elaborate on how fast you have to tune before the sweep stops altogether. Not withstanding Carl's method, I do not see how the sweep is of much us
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00578.html (11,207 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Sweep on OII (score: 1)
Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:46:48 -0700
Poor analogy on my part. Simply trying to get a better handle on the term "near-realtime", as referring possibly to the display of a signal in time (latency). Had not considered the operation you've
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00581.html (10,220 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Sweep on OII (score: 1)
Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:35:28 -0700
Bob, that may be true in certain circumstances, however irrespective of this, I have found the spectrum display to be extremely effective when watching for band openings, for example, 10m during spor
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00620.html (10,931 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:14:49 -0700
Maybe, just maybe the obscene $15,000 CAD sticker has tended to limit its proliferation. Kirb, VE6IV -- If you really want scarcity, look at the (very few) reviews of the new Yaesu FTdx9000. I don't
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00081.html (8,449 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion II delivered (score: 1)
Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:00:51 -0700
My experience as well. Ten Tec will ship via FedEx at your request. You pay the difference in cost between the two services. In my case it was well worth the extra dollars given the fact UPS charges
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00326.html (9,986 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:15:30 -0700
Does Ten-Tec publish or make available, a running bug-list so that the users (not just the beta testers), can determine whether a particular idiosyncrasy has already been reported? It would certainly
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00722.html (7,749 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Orion shipping (score: 1)
Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:51:15 -0700
Yikes! I hope this was an isolated case. I have mine specified for FedEx 2-day air into Canada to avoid the nightmare we call UPS. I will never see the rig (at my request) should the same happen here
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01097.html (9,211 bytes)

8. [TenTec] O2 Noise Reduction (score: 1)
Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 16:42:21 -0700
HNY all, just wondering what the collective thoughts may be with regard to the O2's NR capabilities, more specifically, how the Orion's NR stacks up against the same in the Icom 756 ProIII? I am curr
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00168.html (7,789 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] O2 Noise Reduction (score: 1)
Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:19:37 -0700
Hello Kirb, I use the PRO II at the ARES station here in Washington County, Idaho (a very noisy location), and it is an excellent NB / NR receiver. I have the ORION II here at home and while I have
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00172.html (10,900 bytes)

10. [TenTec] For Sale: Omni VI+ (Mod. 564, late prod.) , 962 P.S./Speaker (score: 1)
Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:46 -0700
Have decided to sell one of my prized beauties to fund the purchase of a new Orion2. As such, I would like to offer to the TT list members first, a late production (2000 MY) factory OMNI VI+ (mod. 56
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00296.html (8,148 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Editing (score: 1)
Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:12:22 -0700
Q: I currently have a feed-thru PVC pipe transitioning through the basement wall containing 2 runs of LMR-400. These runs extend through the entrance port, into a junction box outside, and up the wal
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00699.html (9,843 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Whirlpool Duet RFI (score: 1)
Author: "knesbitt" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 22:03:45 -0600
As some may recall I reported a similiar situation with my neighbours Neptune washer a short while ago. I am still attempting to resolve the issue through formal channels however it would appear Mayt
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00127.html (13,915 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] [RFI] Whirlpool Duet RFI (score: 1)
Author: "knesbitt" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 20:14:41 -0600
Lee, good move on your part. File a letter of complaint with both the FCC and cc ARRL. We need another "Electric Blanket" action set into motion. Believe me, if you have a few of these move in around
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00141.html (9,348 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Whirlpool Duet, Neptune, Orion (score: 1)
Author: "knesbitt" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:00:07 -0600
GE....are these the same guys that make jet engines (or used to)?? Kirb, VE6IV General Electric used to have (and may still have) what they call a "Value Improvement Program." Best I could tell, what
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00398.html (9,792 bytes)

15. [TenTec] Still wishing to adopt, OMNI Model 564 (score: 1)
Author: "knesbitt" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:29:27 -0600
Looking for a buddy for my OMNI VI+. Interested in purchasing a late production, mint mod. 564 OMNI. Must be from a non-smoking home. Please email with particulars, including options and asking price
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00318.html (7,163 bytes)

16. [TenTec] Keying Amp with my new Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: Kirby Nesbitt <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:12:49 -0600
Just wanted to solicit the list as to whether I will require an intermediate keying relay between my "new" Omni VI+ and a QRO HF-2500DX amp. Amp manual states that the t/r relay should be capable of
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00147.html (7,506 bytes)

17. [TenTec] RE : Re: Keying Amp with my new Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: "knesbitt@nucleus.com" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:05:13 -0600
Ken, thanks for the idea. I do believe the hf2500dx has the qsk feature, however I will have to confirm this when I get back home. In any event it would appear that the linear relay on the OMNI is mo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00215.html (10,231 bytes)

18. [TenTec] RE : Keying Amp with my new Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: "knesbitt@nucleus.com" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:29:49 -0600
Assuming the QRO amp is QSK capable will this permit the safe use of the RELAY OUT on the OMNI in "semi break-in" mode (i.e: slow QSK). Theres no way I'm going to want to mess with manual PTT in a cw
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00271.html (9,940 bytes)

19. [TenTec] RE : Re: RE : Keying Amp with my new Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: "knesbitt@nucleus.com" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:05:27 -0600
The HF-2500Dx does not have a TX EN "ready for transmit" output. As such I would have to assume the high speed switching employed in the amp is engineering to handle the exciter power on key up. As o
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00313.html (9,199 bytes)

20. [TenTec] TCXO identification (score: 1)
Author: Kirby Nesbitt <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:44:16 -0700
I am wondering if someone might be able to tell me how to identify the TCXO in a OMNI VI+of which I am seriously considering purchasing. We suspect the radio does possess the TCXO based on its operat
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00033.html (7,264 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu