Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mahiggins@gmail.com: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] orion sweep mod, questions... (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:01:22 -0500
HI KEN UR RIGHT - MY SWEEP NOT RIGHT ALSO - TT KNOWS ABOUT IT AND A FIX IS COMIMG SOON. MY HW MOD WAS DONE BY TT. HOPE U DIDN'T PULL OUT TOO MUCH HAIR !! HI HI RAY W1JUS. ____________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01103.html (9,522 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Back from the future - Orion I (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:27:36 -0500
Hi Buck what I thought was distortion on SP and SEND went away when I turned down MON to about 13 while using headphones . I wonder if TT upped the the head phone gain. I was hearing real garbage in
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01171.html (8,913 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] back from the future - Orion I (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:17:45 -0500
Bob interesting about RF AF AND MON SETTINGS. I KEEP MY MON @ 20 WITH MIC@40 WITH HEIL 5 ELEMENT. SP@3-7 WITH NO DISTORTION ON SEPERATE REC AND DURING QSO-- I WAS AFFRAID OF GARBAGE-- BUT SOUND WAS F
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01196.html (10,378 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion V2.055 (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:38:07 -0500
HI BOB - I REALY AGREE WITH YOU ON 2.055 - NR FER SSB TERIFFIC . HOWEVER HERES THE RUB; WHAT WORKS FER SSB IS NOT SO HOT FER CW . THIS IS THE FIRST SETUP THAT I ALMOST ALWAYS USE NR (NO ECHOES VERY L
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00087.html (8,076 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:01:19 -0500
HI LEE NR FER ME MUCH BETTER! I ONLY OPERATE SSB; AND ALL OR NOTHING DIDN'T WORK FER ME! I SIMPLY DIDN'T USE IT! FORWARD TO THE FUTURE FER ME! 2.055 ALL THE WAY! LEE I'D BE INTERESTED TO SEE IF U USE
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00089.html (10,814 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Which to buy.... (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 18:37:36 -0500
Ron As someone who has had an 870 @ pro3 I couldn't agree with you more. Both rigs are really great. I operate 99% rag chew and nets and the ORION is more rig than I "really need" But U know what, I
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00106.html (9,941 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:11:10 -0500
Bill I also agree with you about NR. 2.055. Best by far I've seen fer SSB. All or nothing never fer me since I only operate SSB. But when i tried NR on CW 1.371 was very effective. Kewood has NR1 FER
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00112.html (12,388 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] NR and Orion 2.055 (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:33:55 -0500
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00217.html (8,526 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] NR and Orion 2.055 (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 18:51:11 -0500
Hi Doc I'm new to this email thing. I also like 2.055 NR on ssb and found 1.372 of no use. I also like AN, auto USB/LSB, the way rec is in use underlined, RF gain like everybody else, the quietness o
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00234.html (9,022 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 09:25:47 -0500
Worked 12 stations on 75 meters @ around 08:00Z last night. Received rave reports & rec audio was great. Using 2.055 with Heil-5 - Settings- Mic 60,SP 3-7,no Eq Lf 150 and Width 2700. 73's Ray W1JUS.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00258.html (9,503 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] The ORION II sure makes me happy (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:59:10 -0500
Duane I've sent several positive comments along to ditsnbits@tentec.com. I've had my O1 since Sept 03 with no problems. There is also a comment group on 75 and boy do the Jap boys like to hear the ha
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01305.html (10,761 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] The ORION II sure makes me happy (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:58:12 -0500
Duane if you look again at the last sentence again I hope you'll see the intention of my email was to SUPPORT you. In retrospect I should have said that I thought ur email was the best I've seen on t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01339.html (12,518 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] The ORION II sure makes me happy (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:11:53 -0500
Duane, boy do I agree with you about the negative comments! I was so disgusted I almost sold my Orion ! Glad things are OK with us becuse you are a stand up guy & I was much happier w/o the reflector
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01349.html (15,614 bytes)

14. [TenTec] ORION (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:44:22 -0400
Will I receive ORION email or is it on a separate site ? Tnx Ray. -- The joy is in the journey... Mary Ann Higgins _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00284.html (6,363 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] 2.059d on Orion 565.....raspy rx audio? (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:29:36 -0400
Hi - I'm getting raspy TX audio only when using 2.059 with the SP, and Iike previous firmware better for SP and NR(for SSB) on my O1. I'm staying with 2.059 since is TT's best effort to date and I ju
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00380.html (9,506 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] 2.059d on Orion 565.....raspy rx audio? (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:49:10 -0400
Rick; Try adjusting the contrast to aprox, 40 and I think you will see what I,m talking about. I,ll run on air tests and see what happens. NR is fair and I don't use it,but NR & AN are great. 73' s R
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00383.html (11,361 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] N9JG--Orion and RF Feedback (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:55:40 -0400
Hi - One thing that made a nite & day difference to me was using a mike with a metal case; Heil HM-10,TT 708. My antennas are very close ( 25ft) and using the TT 706 was a disaster when using the ALS
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00408.html (9,017 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Orion 1, No RIT, XIT (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:59:21 -0400
Tim might be that the encoder knob does not have enough distance between it and the panel. Mine did the same thing and when I called TT that is what the told me to increase the distance from the pane
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00567.html (9,804 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Orion freezing up (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:18:16 -0400
Hi I had a similar problem when using my ORION and the ALINCO PS, Also some ASTRONS with poor internal grounding can cause problems. Also RIGBLASTER ( Type) power strips. TT also recommends having po
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00580.html (8,373 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Have questions (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:31:00 -0400
Hi John - Well I don't know about the Inrad, but it is my understanding that it is below 1.0 that rec. is affected. I have the 1.8 TT and hardly use it but when I do I see no change in rec. The few t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00581.html (8,234 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu