Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mark@microenh.com: 671 ]

Total 671 documents matching your query.

301. [TenTec] TenTec Hamfest Rumors (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:10:46 -0400
On the Pegasus / Jupiter / Orion net last evening, someone mentioned that TenTec told them at the hamfest that they are working on a new mid-range (between the Jupiter and Orion) transceiver and a ne
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00134.html (7,221 bytes)

302. Re: [TenTec] Hercules III? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:24:10 -0400
I believe one of the problems were that the final transistors were either hard or impossible to find replacements for. Mark
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00163.html (8,705 bytes)

303. Re: [TenTec] TenTec] Observations on my Orion (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:02:24 -0400
Joe, Try ac5og - that is a valid, and the correct call.. There is an excellent article about SDR (Software Defined Radios) in the October 2003 CQ Magazine. 73, Mark and I rig. it's what at
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00169.html (9,651 bytes)

304. Re: [TenTec] Hercules II demise? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 22:34:44 -0400
Thanks for clearing up the misunderstanding. Mark
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00192.html (8,280 bytes)

305. Re: Orion was ( [TenTec] Hercules III / Mark Erbaugh) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 09:25:43 -0400
As long as we're dreaming, how about a small internal monochrome display (as now), but with a "standard" video connector for an external color monitor. The hardware cost for a PC type video adapter w
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00201.html (10,886 bytes)

306. Re: Orion was ( [TenTec] Hercules III / Mark Erbaugh) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:55:00 -0400
Duane, Ethernet would work, but the internal software would have to support an external interface to get the data. For example, the spectrum scope on the Jupiter screen is better than anything you ca
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00211.html (11,052 bytes)

307. Re: Orion was ( [TenTec] Hercules III / Mark Erbaugh) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:55:35 -0400
no Good point. When I first got my Icom 756 (original), I thought the display was "ugly" and wished Icom had done it differently. The more I worked with it, the more I saw how it fit the operating n
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00249.html (10,949 bytes)

308. Re: [TenTec] Displaying radio data externally, or a new way to buildradios (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:55:54 -0400
That would be nice, but I imagine that inside a computer is a pretty nasty with computer generated RFI. Even better would be an automatic sweep function that would do the sweep (with special AGC) an
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00250.html (10,641 bytes)

309. Re: [TenTec] Timewave 59+ with Omni 6+ (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:12:15 -0400
I've uses a Timewave 599zx with my Omni VI (opt 3). I don't know if the same applies to the 59+. The DSP has much narrower filters for CW. Also, I like being able to adjust the spot tone level on the
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00277.html (8,985 bytes)

310. Re: [TenTec] Opinions on StepIR vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:03:00 -0400
I've not used the StepIR antennas, but the technology does interest me. I think part of the attraction may be the physical tuning to resonance. Though I've read many of Kurt Sterba's Aerials columns
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00299.html (9,650 bytes)

311. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter + Studio One microphone settings (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 23:10:00 -0400
Jason, The monitor output on the Jupiter and Pegasus doesn't reflect any TX audio adjustments. You need to listen to yourself in another receiver, or get on-air feedback from others. 73, Mark
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00319.html (9,046 bytes)

312. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter + Studio One microphone settings (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 11:31:27 -0400
John, If you look at the schematic for the Pegasus (so I assume the Jupiter as well), the front and rear inputs go through identical input circuitry so that there is no advantage to one over the othe
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00349.html (9,777 bytes)

313. Re: [TenTec] Re: Rudimentary SWR question... (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 08:49:28 -0400
My understanding (from reading Reflections II) is that this power is re-reflected regardless of whether a tuner is present. Assuming that your transmitter can handle the mismatch w/o folding back ou
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00606.html (11,490 bytes)

314. [TenTec] Orion Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:04:24 -0400
Ever since the people using the Orion started showing up on the 40m Pegasus / Jupiter / Orion / Argonaut TenTec SDR net, I've noticed that I can usually detect the use of an Orion by the distinctive
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00642.html (8,523 bytes)

315. Re: [TenTec] Orion tx audio (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:37:18 -0400
Rob, I think the audio levels are correct. The signals sound fine. I just think that the Orion is able to get a better peak power using some sort of DSP "magic". Mark scan
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00648.html (8,636 bytes)

316. Re: [TenTec] Considering Pegasus Purchase (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:14:32 -0400
Dave, I've had a lot of fun with my Pegasus. While it's no Orion in the performance arena, it certainly has a lot of bang for the buck If you are talking about the PT-11P from LDG, I have heard that
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00716.html (9,793 bytes)

317. Re: [TenTec] Considering Pegasus Purchase (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:14:32 -0400
Dave, I've had a lot of fun with my Pegasus. While it's no Orion in the performance arena, it certainly has a lot of bang for the buck If you are talking about the PT-11P from LDG, I have heard that
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00717.html (9,798 bytes)

318. Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter Software version 1.25 (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:17:57 -0400
shack That's not suprising. I have found that those USB serial ports are not 100% compatible with all software. I ordered one and found that it wouldn't work with the N4PY Pegasus control software,
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00744.html (9,590 bytes)

319. [TenTec] RX-340 Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:24:08 -0500
Yesterday, when I was using my Pegasus / RX-340 combo (using N4PY software), the top left LED display (the one with filter, PBT, etc) info went blank. The functions still seem to work okay, both unde
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00809.html (8,342 bytes)

320. Re: [TenTec] Argo V control (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 21:05:50 -0400
Marty, The Argo has it's own protocol. I don't think it emulates any other radio (even other TenTec's). You can download the protocol specifications from the web at http://www.rfsquared.com/ArgoV/Arg
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00070.html (8,512 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu