Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:martin.ewing@gmail.com: 165 ]

Total 165 documents matching your query.

141. [TenTec] Orion, *nix, and hamlib (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:56:17 -0400
Any Linux / Orion programmers out there? I've been working on the Orion "backend" for Hamlib, the "universal" free library that aims to provide a rig-independent programming environment. It is now wo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00136.html (8,302 bytes)

142. Re: [TenTec] Orion, *nix, and hamlib (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:09:33 -0400
The core routines make the interface that the application programmer sees. The "back-end" has the code that knows a particular rig's I/O capabilities, like an I/O driver. The actual code is pretty st
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00164.html (10,701 bytes)

143. Re: [TenTec] Orion and WWV (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:42:21 -0400
That's what the subreceiver is for! General coverage. In the computer world, we say RTFM. :-) 73, Martin AA6E -- martin.ewing@gmail.com http://blog.aa6e.net
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00182.html (7,859 bytes)

144. Re: [TenTec] Popping Noise from Orion and Centurion (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 08:44:06 -0400
Tommy's right (per normal also). I'd only add that some perspective is good. On the lower HF bands, more loss on Rx is usually good -- or at least neutral. It means lower intermod distortion. Your si
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00232.html (9,775 bytes)

145. Re: [TenTec] STOP! (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 18:02:26 -0400
On email reading: I am using the new Google 'gmail' system. It's really good for reading high-volume mailing lists, like Tentec. Keeps track of threaded "conversations" nicely. It's very fast, and th
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00266.html (7,630 bytes)

146. Re: [TenTec] YACWD and real CW ops (FCC) (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:55:22 -0400
Those weren't mean old men, those were engineers! (government engineers, at that, and worse, maybe hams) I don't remember "women"! :-) 73, Martin AA6E -- martin.ewing@gmail.com http://blog.aa6e.net
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00309.html (8,339 bytes)

147. Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth" (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:14:09 -0400
AM forever! - read the article: "The EC made no change to its earlier recommendation that the rules continue to permit double-sideband, full-carrier AM and independent sideband (ISB) as specific exce
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00349.html (9,934 bytes)

148. Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth" (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:08:12 -0400
It's been said before, but the ARRL is all we've got. They are hard-working and well-meaning, even if they don't measure up to some folks' wishes. If there's another organization that's doing a bette
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00365.html (9,591 bytes)

149. Re: [TenTec] TenTec get together at Dayton (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:42:27 -0400
I'll give you a "90% probable". Will there be a good way to meet up or get messages at Dayton? A special table for Orion firmware kvetchers like me? :-) -73, Martin AA6E -- martin.ewing@gmail.com htt
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00472.html (10,026 bytes)

150. Re: [TenTec] cw creation (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:18:06 -0400
In theory, there really is no difference. The math is equivalent and there's no way you can distinguish a CW signal that starts life as a keyed AF tone and gets mixed up to RF and one that starts as
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00564.html (10,456 bytes)

151. [TenTec] Fwd: cw creation (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 23:46:49 -0400
I'm not sure I understand your drift (no pun). The idea of "CW" is that you have a keyed oscillator at some frequency, and that oscillator may get translated (or even multiplied, in the old days) to
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00570.html (11,369 bytes)

152. Re: [TenTec] cw creation (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:39:43 -0400
Having nothing better to do, I went to the FCC website to read up on Part 97 and what they say about CW. The relevant sections are 97.3 which refer back to 2.201 and 2.202. Some excerpts are at the e
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00642.html (12,851 bytes)

153. Re: [TenTec] cw creation (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:13:34 -0400
RC - Interesting story. I remember some A2A code practice on 2 meters years ago. I think the reasons for A2A were rigs designed only for voice (no key input on Tx, no BFO on Rx) and rigs that weren't
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00646.html (10,698 bytes)

154. Re: [TenTec] Orion and TVI (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:37:55 -0400
Giuseppe - We would need more information. What bands and what modes make trouble for you? Is it on specific TV channels or on all channels? The simple suggestion is to check the grounding of your eq
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00660.html (12,314 bytes)

155. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filters (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:25:30 -0400
I don't know about any consensus - depends on your operating style. For me, the stock filters have been fine. Better to put the extra cash into aluminum, or possibly Jack Daniels.. hi 73, Martin AA6E
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00677.html (7,802 bytes)

156. Re: [TenTec] Orion "work in progress" (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:32:00 -0500
Three per second. Not much time to chew the rag! Martin AA6E -- martin.ewing@gmail.com http://blog.aa6e.net
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00508.html (8,958 bytes)

157. Re: [TenTec] Orion Processing (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:21:33 -0500
The DragonBall is in the 68000 family, which is old enough that we spoke of MIPS. Choose whatever measure you like -- clock rate is abt 16 MHz -- it's pretty slow compared to most anyone's desktop PC
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00527.html (9,529 bytes)

158. Re: [TenTec] apparent match possible in T Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:24:40 -0500
Yes, but anyone can join ARRL if they want. The international rate is US$39 if all you want is the annual CDROM and online access and not hardcopy QST. 73, Martin AA6E -- martin.ewing@gmail.com http:
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00537.html (9,437 bytes)

159. Re: [TenTec] OT: It's a pity (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:36:11 -0500
I sympathize with the wish to share. On the other hand, it's a copyrighted and restricted article. I wonder where the line on "fair use" is drawn in Newington. Sending someone a copy is much less an
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00549.html (10,403 bytes)

160. Re: [TenTec] Orion Processing (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:23:20 -0500
Take a look at http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=MC68EZ328 73, Martin AA6E -- martin.ewing@gmail.com http://blog.aa6e.net
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00571.html (11,339 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu