- 1. [TenTec] Omni 546 C: CW filter questions (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 08:35:01 +0000
- A week ago I managed to obtain an unused, new in the box, stored for 28 years Omni 546 C with 280 power supply and 215 microphone. Have the PTO kit on order and when I clean the gummed up grease in t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00474.html (7,994 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] Omni 546C CW filter (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:56:37 +0000
- Many thanks to all who responded to my enquiry. Inrad seems to have dropped their prices since the #753 (which I think is the 400 Hz filter) is $ 115.- versus the $ 109.- of TenTec. Will shoot an enq
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00483.html (7,430 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] Inrad (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:14:44 +0000
- Perhaps some one on the list can shed some light on this. I have written to Inrad both on their old contact address and their new contact address and get no reply. Similarly I see in the catalogue th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00503.html (7,972 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] This list is great! (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:43:35 +0000
- Many thanks to those who replied. I have had one offer of a HAM who will contact Inrad and find out more for me. The helpfullness of all is much appreciated! Marinus, ZL2ML __________________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00507.html (6,961 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] Inrad 1000 Hz filter #766 (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:16:43 +0000
- I am reading up on new technology that has come about since I left ham radio back in 1985. Interesting to read about using multiple filters and then controlling the bandwidth by "shifting" one filter
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00510.html (7,720 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] Inrad 1000 Hz filter #766 (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:44:03 +0000
- Mike, Gerald Thanks for the wonderfull information and detailing what is the best use for the different filters. 73, Marinus, ZL2ML _________________________________________________________________ D
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00516.html (8,005 bytes)
- 7. [TenTec] New generation ham's (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:28:01 +0000
- Geoff thanks for the response. Me thinks (without intending to offend anyone) that technology is rapidly changing this world and if mankind does not watch out it will be extinct in a short timeframe.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00517.html (9,045 bytes)
- 8. [TenTec] younger generation (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:32:25 +0000
- Pfew.... looks like I stepped on some people's toes. Sorry! I stand corrected then as I must have the wrong impression of the new generation. Definitely a sign that I am getting an old fogie. 73, Mar
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00522.html (7,368 bytes)
- 9. [TenTec] balanced antenna tuner ( or how to do things on the cheap - tribute to Geoff's drive for cost effect (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:44:53 +0000
- Geoff In your drive for equipment on the cheap I like to draw your attention to the S-Match as promoted by PA0FRI: http://www.xs4all.nl/~pa0fri/ATU/Smatch/smatcheng.htm It uses only three components,
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00533.html (8,428 bytes)
- 10. [TenTec] CW filters Omni-C (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:17:58 +0000
- Recognizing a wealth of expertise on this mailing list I like to invite your input on something that has kept me occupied for the past few days. I like to add a CW filter to my Omni-C. TenTec has sol
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00552.html (8,724 bytes)
- 11. [TenTec] Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 23:40:37 +0000
- Mike you mention that you won't have the luxurie of running a balanced tuner at your new QTH. I do not understand. A balanced feed will always have the lowest losses, regardless what antenna you hang
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00024.html (7,573 bytes)
- 12. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 02:13:14 +0000
- That's where TwinCom comes into its own. Baluns are only good if you have a matched (tuned) aerial whereas I am using something that is not matched, in other words impedances are all over the place,
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00029.html (9,306 bytes)
- 13. [TenTec] Link coupling ATU's (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 02:16:33 +0000
- Forgot to add that link coupled ATU's are normally pretty quiet and works wonders when using a loop. 73 Marinus, ZL2ML _________________________________________________________________ Invite your ma
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00030.html (7,452 bytes)
- 14. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
- Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 06:05:41 +0000
- Jim I think we have arrived at the "Let's agree to disagree stage". IMHO I think that you look at things too much in isolation. To me the use of chokes is only a patch method trying to minimize the e
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00035.html (8,802 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu