Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:monotreme@ntlworld.com: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...." (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:51:01 +0100
K4IA@aol.com wrote: Wouldn't it be nice to have several stable software versions to choose from? Fix the instability problems in ver 1.371 without changing the NR for instance. Just like one could ch
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00013.html (10,260 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] VOX and CW (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:39:44 +0100
Klaus Heintzenberg wrote: Orion 2 s/n 02C10436 fw 2.032 Menu-CW-PTT in CW as: MOX Internal Keyer ON Choose some band with band-change keypad. Set up SSB mode with VOX=ON on one of the bandstacking re
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00209.html (8,466 bytes)

3. [TenTec] On and on and on and on.... (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:44:50 +0100
So here I am, the owner of a brand new Orion II and much of this reflector would have me believe it is a pos and almost obsolete. Yet I bought it after spending a couple of weeks reading the reflecto
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00271.html (10,785 bytes)

4. [TenTec] 706 microphone response (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:54:36 +0100
Does any of the team know the polar response of the 706 microphone? Is it cardioid (unidirectional) or omni? Pete, G4PLZ
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00506.html (7,441 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:00:11 +0100
3). The missing 9 dB of low frequency response at 50 Hz as shown in the specifications; Ron I am fascinated to find out why a better response is needed at 50Hz. A bass singing voice might go down to
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00582.html (10,334 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:06:34 +0100
Yes, I see that from the measurement you report on your website but that isn't what your bullet point was and I still don't quite understand the need for an increase in response at 50Hz. I think you
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00601.html (11,739 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] 706 microphone response (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:09:08 +0100
Apologies for replying to myself but in case anybody else wants to know it would appear that a Primo EM-60 or EM-100 electret capsule is used which means that it is almost certainly omnidirectional.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00602.html (8,160 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:18:03 +0100
I measured it using the parameters you show on your web page http://www.ronc.users.sonic.net/Frequency%20Response%20jpg.jpg which is entitled 'Orion II Frequency Response', and using the technique yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00632.html (17,965 bytes)

9. [TenTec] My rare Ten Tec microphone (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:32:31 +0100
Together with my excellent O2 I purchased an excellent Ten Tec 708A unidirectional microphone which an informal test shows as indeed being a cardioid or 'uni-directional' microphone. The Ten Tec webs
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00633.html (8,965 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:39:09 +0100
Yes adjust, switch switch, adjust, switch switch, etc etc was one of the things that was drummed into me during my BBC training in the analogue age. You spent the first part of each morning 'lining u
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00635.html (15,777 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] My rare Ten Tec microphone (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:50:55 +0100
Hi Scott, It says uni-directional in the website text both for the 708 and 709 as well as the picture of the base. This informed my buying decision. My 'informal test' consisted of inverting the mic
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00656.html (12,508 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] My Rare Ten Tec microphone (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:02:20 +0100
They can be OK if used at very close spacing to the intended sound source; the reduced gain needed at the rig input can help reduce reflections, blower noise and unwanted vox action. This is workable
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00665.html (11,269 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] My Rare Ten Tec microphone (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:09:04 +0100
The mounting will mask high frequencies from the rear, giving it a degree of apparent directivity. The term uni-directional isn't really valid in a microphone context. A cardioid results from the sup
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00666.html (9,733 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Orion Settings (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:40:32 +0100
Seems some people have some issues and others do not. Is it possible to do a settings dump from the processor. This could be placed into a general file for others to see and compare. As complex as th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00670.html (8,725 bytes)

15. [TenTec] Orion II schematics (score: 1)
Author: Peter Connors <monotreme@ntlworld.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:00:15 +0100
Have appeared on rfsquared.com. Or have they been there for weeks and I haven't noticed? Pete, G4PLZ
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00836.html (7,596 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu