Mail Archive Search: <+from:moore@moore.sr.unh.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:moore@moore.sr.unh.edu: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Anyone help w/debugging 2m T-Kit? (score: 1): Author: moore@moore.sr.unh.edu (Andrew M. Moore); Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 14:55:12 -0400 (EDT); I am in the process of building the TEN-TEC T-Kit 2 meter radio. I'm thrilled to see that a manufacturer is offering such a well-built, no-frills kit at such a good price, and I'm even more thrilled; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00006.html (7,732 bytes)
2. T-Kit 1220 follow-up (score: 1): Author: moore@moore.sr.unh.edu (Andrew M. Moore); Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 11:00:52 -0400 (EDT); Thanks for everyone's comments on my T-Kit 1220 debugging. I tweaked the CPU frequency last night, and the problem is solved. I am now measuring the "squelch current" represented as DC at the test po; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00011.html (6,800 bytes)
3. Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (fwd) (score: 1): Author: moore@moore.sr.unh.edu (Andrew M. Moore); Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 16:31:41 -0400 (EDT); [whining about TEN-TEC's lack of attention deleted] If they catered to the needs of only a single customer, they would be out of business a long time ago. well in other modes too. I never use them mu; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00024.html (7,726 bytes)
4. Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (fwd) (score: 1): Author: moore@moore.sr.unh.edu (Andrew M. Moore); Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 16:49:09 -0400 (EDT); ... I didn't realize the problems were so widely known, and I apologize if my own bias took over. It's difficult for me to be objective in a discussion about a product with which I'm so happy. Andre; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00025.html (6,919 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]