Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mtracy@arrl.org: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>(by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>)
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 10:17:34 -0400
(I forwarded Michels' response since he is not a member of this list...de W4ZV) Hi Bill, I have to disagree, as this would mislead folks even more. There never has been a *single* number that defines
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00154.html (8,917 bytes)

2. [TenTec] QST Prod Rev Expanded Reports: a proposal (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:50:25 -0400
Folks, As some of you might have heard, the Expanded Test Result Reports that supplement QST Product Reviews of HF transceivers have had to be mostly eliminated. Basically, the ARRL Lab's plate is ve
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00060.html (8,102 bytes)

3. [TenTec] RE: Error in Ten-Tec Orion (565) Review? (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:49:18 -0500
John (and the group), I was on vacation last week, and was greeted by a dead computer when I got back, so I am just now getting this email. The Orion review text is not in error - indeed there is a d
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00192.html (7,503 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Re: Help with Scout 555 (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:21:42 -0500
Don, I bought a used 555 from Ten-Tec early last year and found the tuning to be stiff indeed, even for a PTO design. Bravely (foolishly?), I took the thing completely apart (this took some doing) an
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00295.html (7,453 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Re: Orion and phase noise (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:43:11 -0500
Hi John (and other TT group readers), Just a quick note amidst working on the Orion expanded report (it will be ready early next week). Receiver phase noise can be measured fairly simply in most tran
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00193.html (7,444 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Orion Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:58:31 -0500
Good News/Bad News The good news is that the ARRL Lab expanded test result report is done and will appear on the Product Reviews web page in short order. ARRL members can download the report as an Ad
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00392.html (8,440 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:25:52 -0500
Paul and the group, Sorry for the out of sequence stuff, but I have been away for a week. ARRL Lab test equipment is calibrated according to the manufacturer's suggested calibration schedule. In most
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00784.html (8,978 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Re: Orion Expanded Report (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:59:49 -0500
The innermost points of the swept graphs has been 1 kHz as long as I have been doing the testing (since May 1997). A couple of the very earliest tests used slightly different frequencies - the inner
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00785.html (8,589 bytes)

9. [TenTec] RE: Orion Expanded Report (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:14:28 -0500
While I don't have time this week to check the whole list that Bill posted, I looked at the 1 kHz data for the K2 and the Orion. The figures for the K2 should be 67 and 116 dB (both preamp on). The w
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00877.html (10,399 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Re: Jupiter Extended Report (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:40:08 -0500
Generally, the swept tests have only been performed on high end rigs, with a couple of noteable exceptions (I did the IC-706 and FT-100 rigs because the 706 was done in Mar 96 before I became the Tes
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00920.html (8,151 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Antenna Analyzers (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:55:27 -0400
Anyone needing a schematic for their MFJ259 should try a Google search on mfj259.zip Of course, a tweezers and microscope would be really helpful in attempting repairs (not to mention a good source f
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00314.html (8,752 bytes)

12. [TenTec] Scout PTO question (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 09:55:17 -0400
All this talk of PTO rebuilding makes me wonder about the Scout that I bought some months ago. The PTO in it turns fairly easily on one end of the range, but gets progressively tighter when tuning to
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00402.html (7,561 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Sample-to-Sample Variations (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 11:03:11 -0500
"To underscore Ed's point, I just came across the January '92 QST review of the Ten-Tec Argonaut II/Delta II transceivers. The ARRL lab found IP3 of the Argonaut to be -11 dbM while the Delta II IP3
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00690.html (8,767 bytes)

14. [TenTec] Expanded test report on the Argo V available (score: 1)
Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 11:07:37 -0500
Hi Folks, Just wanted to let you know that the expanded test report on the Argonaut V is now available for downloading. 73, Michael Tracy, KC1SX
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00691.html (6,884 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu