Mail Archive Search: <+from:n1eu@yahoo.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:n1eu@yahoo.com: 362 ]

Total 362 documents matching your query.

201. [TenTec] INRAD 2.4khz 10 Pole Filter (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 17:18:01 -0700 (PDT); Wow - didn't take long for Jim to cut to the chase Imp't question as Jim points out is: Is the INRAD 756 okay for the first 9Mhz slot? Also need to verify what I saw - can someone else slip a 756 in; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00050.html (11,796 bytes)
202. [TenTec] INRAD 2.4khz 10 Pole Filter (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 04:40:18 -0700 (PDT); Thanks to Greg for the info on his success with the 756. To make a long story short, I just rechecked the Omni this morning and the feedback with the 756 at full rf throttle is gone. My apologies for; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00053.html (9,380 bytes)
203. [TenTec] AGC: ON or OFF Survey (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 11:56:51 -0700 (PDT); (In response to Jim's polling of AGC use on cw) Must confess to hardly ever leaving fast AGC mode, although I will start experimenting on cw with it off. If I could interject another question into th; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00060.html (10,232 bytes)
204. [TenTec] GADZOOKS! PICKY, PICKY, PICKY!!!! (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:56:27 -0400 (EDT); Just a quick comment that I think there should be room for all in the TT Reflector gang - those who are totally satisfied with their rigs as they are, and those who are critical of their rigs or wish; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00296.html (12,701 bytes)
205. [TenTec] 961 PS connection to Omni 6 (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 15:05:54 -0700 (PDT); Hi Gang, Still trying to exorcise the RF demons from my Omni 6+, which are causing severe audio distortion on 17/12 meters. I am about to add some .01uf/2000V bypass caps to the ac line input of the; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00048.html (7,542 bytes)
206. [TenTec] Omni 6 SWR meter (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 06:53:34 -0700 (PDT); The SWR meter on my Omni 6 doesn't seem to do a whole heck of a lot (operator error?). Never seems to climb above 1.5 even with a deliberate mismatch. Is there something I don't know about using it?; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00151.html (7,295 bytes)
207. [TenTec] Omni 6 SWR meter (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 09:39:31 -0700 (PDT); Thanks for the responses I got so far. Wanted to share them & hope you guys don't mind. Thanks Mike, but running full output into an antenna I know is about 2:1, my Omni says 1.1:1 ??? Thanks for con; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00153.html (8,739 bytes)
208. [TenTec] Inrad filters for Ten-Tec (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 03:59:22 -0700 (PDT); A link is worth a thousand words, eh? http://www.qth.com/inrad/ 73, Barry N1EU _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00190.html (7,874 bytes)
209. [TenTec] TT INRAD Filters (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 11:34:01 -0700 (PDT); Good questions Gunner. I'm an INRAD fan myself, but I happen to have Ten Tec 500hz and 250hz filters in both if's - rig came with them ;-). I notice no ringing, great tuning, and great readability on; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00205.html (8,789 bytes)
210. [TenTec] TT vs. INRAD Filters (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 17:32:50 -0700 (PDT); Enjoying this thread ;-) So many choices, lots of great filters, so much fun! Okay, back down to earth. Wanted to reply to Jim's comment below: Why can't the INRAD 2.4 filter fit into the N-1 or N-2; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00213.html (8,066 bytes)
211. [TenTec] TT vs. INRAD Filters (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 20:05:14 -0700 (PDT); Great to know we can have our cake and eat it too (with both the INRAD 2.8 and 2.4 filters in the 9Mhz if)! I would also give up the #221 to make room, but definitely put it back in for cw contests.; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00217.html (8,315 bytes)
212. [TenTec] Solved!!! (Long) No Longer Plagued by RF - Omni/Centurion (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 15:46:31 -0700 (PDT); Thought I'd fill you all in on the final chapter of my little drama, in which N1EU triumphs after being plagued unceasingly by horrible nasty RF-induced ssb distortion from his Omni 6+/Centurion comb; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00253.html (9,619 bytes)
213. [TenTec] Omni V SSB Monitor Circuit (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 03:08:12 -0700 (PDT); I went through this exercise about 2 months ago when I first got my Omni 6+ and really missed the lack of monitor. Someone e-mailed me the schematic (big jpeg file) for the mod applied to the Omni 6; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00277.html (9,726 bytes)
214. [TenTec] Enough of this crap - for Ten Tec fans (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (Barry Gross); Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 15:43:54 -0700 (PDT); Yes, you can easily block email addresses with your email reading software. I encourage others to not respond to obvious attempts at baiting Ten-Tec fans. I don't know what these idiots are doing sen; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00063.html (8,067 bytes)
215. [TenTec] Enough of this crap - for Ten Tec fans (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 19:35:26 -0700 (PDT); Lane, please look carefully to see who originated what message. Reid Simmons posted a reply (sans callsign)to a message I originated, but my message wasn't set off from his text. (FYI, I have a Kenwo; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00107.html (11,966 bytes)
216. [TenTec] SSB monitoring for Omni 6? (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 18:52:44 -0700 (PDT); I just received my newly purchased Omni 6 (opt 3) and have it fired up with the Centurion. Just getting familiar with this fantastic rig. Wow!!! Just wondering if there are any mods or schemes to int; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00164.html (7,107 bytes)
217. [TenTec] How RF-susceptible is Omni 6 mic input? (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 12:13:33 -0700 (PDT); Guess I tried to say it all in the subject line :-) I'm having bit of trouble with distorted transmit audio on 17 and 10 meters when I run through the linear. Using an Omni 6 and Centurion. Never had; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00204.html (7,468 bytes)
218. [TenTec] International Radio Filters? (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 07:21:10 -0700 (PDT); Using the food metaphor, I would say that the INRAD 2.8's will make your rig sound like golden honey on ssb :-) (I know the original thread was about cw filters, but thought I'd throw this in) 73, Ba; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00238.html (7,834 bytes)
219. [TenTec] DSP Rom Version of Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 09:58:37 -0700 (PDT); Just wondering if Ten-Tec is still on version 1.0 DSP ROM for the Omni 6+ , or if an update was ever implemented? 73, Barry N1EU _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00273.html (7,014 bytes)
220. [TenTec] speakers (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 07:26:53 -0700 (PDT); Just thought it might be worth mentioning - the Omni 6 also has a low level audio output jack on the rear panel that has a fixed level (doesn't vary with the volume control). Some Omni users suspect; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00413.html (9,468 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]