Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4lq@iglou.com: 866 ]

Total 866 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TenTec] mystery Ten-Tec Omni (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:24:03 -0500
The spur is just below the 17m ham band and is about 1 watt in power, suitable for world-wide communications! The "lucky" thing was that you weren't caught.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00601.html (10,229 bytes)

102. Re: [TenTec] new rig suggestions (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:36:45 -0500
The fist IF freq. is too high for an affordable roofing filter. I think the IF before the DSP is 455khz, not sure. You could rig up a crystal, cw filter to kick in when needed fairly easily. This was
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00624.html (10,894 bytes)

103. [TenTec] Pegasus/Jupe Band Scope Questn (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:21:51 -0500
What limits the speed of the Peg/Jup's band scope? When I used the Jupiter's bandscope it was fairly fast but when using it in Peg mode, it is really s l o wwww. Is this the fault of the rig, firmwar
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00635.html (8,272 bytes)

104. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus/Jupe Band Scope Questn (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:41:10 -0500
Thanks Carl. It makes sense. When the Jupiter does it's own scan, it's much faster. 2 questions: Does the agc not affect the Jupe in standalone mode scanning? Could a firmware change take care of thi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00639.html (11,897 bytes)

105. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus/Jupe Band Scope Questn (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:10:31 -0500
Does the bandwidth of the dsp affect the definition of the peaks on the scope? If so, wouldn't you need to do some demodulating? Steve Ellington N4LQ@iglou.com -- Original Message -- From: "Duane - N
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00642.html (13,171 bytes)

106. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus/Jupe Band Scope Questn (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:42:02 -0500
I had a Flex SDR here for a while and it has the most beautifully defined bandscope I've ever seen It makes the ICOM PROs look like trash. It takes the I and Q signals from the "Tayloe" detector, whi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00659.html (10,859 bytes)

107. Re: [TenTec] New LDG Tuners for Jupiter and Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:01:04 -0500
Will it work on the Pegasus as well as the Jupiter? Steve Ellington N4LQ@iglou.com -- Original Message -- From: "LDG Electronics" <ldg@ldgelectronics.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, F
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00680.html (11,743 bytes)

108. Re: [TenTec] New LDG Tuners for Jupiter and Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:22:52 -0500
Sturart: I have a Peggy here with the internal tuner and it works fine. I was just curious if this new model would be a direct swap. Steve Ellington N4LQ@iglou.com -- Original Message -- From: "Stuar
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00698.html (11,348 bytes)

109. Re: [TenTec] New LDG Tuners for Jupiter and Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:15:28 -0500
I just got this Peg today. The internal tuner seems to work fine. I'm using the N4PY pgm and there are 5 buttons that control the tuner. 3 of them are for making fine adjustments. It does make quite
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00705.html (14,145 bytes)

110. Re: [TenTec] New LDG Tuners for Jupiter and Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:09:09 -0500
I have no idea what lurks inside this white box but i though LDG made all of TTs internal tuners. Steve Ellington N4LQ@iglou.com -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLin
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00707.html (16,531 bytes)

111. Re: [TenTec] 263 Remote VFO PTO (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:03:59 -0500
Wish I knew the exact size wrench but yes on most TT gear you must remove all knobs and front panel to access the screws holding the PTO on the frame. Steve Ellington N4LQ@iglou.com -- Original Messa
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00749.html (8,482 bytes)

112. Re: [TenTec] cw paddle (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:47:45 -0500
A local here has one hooked to his Omni VI (note how I mentioned TenTec) and I had a chance to use it. I was very impressed and if I weren't spending so much money on filters I would buy one myself.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00073.html (7,935 bytes)

113. Re: [TenTec] signal on 28.634 (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 18:46:21 -0500
I'm hearing it here in KY, S4 at 6:40PM. It almost sounds like low speed data. The only explanation for the wide coverage and constant strength is: ITS FROM OUTER SPACE. I just fed the audio into my
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00100.html (10,527 bytes)

114. Re: [TenTec] signal on 28.634 (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 18:50:21 -0500
BTW: In all seriousness, I've been hearing a steady carrier on 80m at 3521.00khz for 2 weeks now. My buddy down in SC can also hear it at about the same strength. Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- Fr
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00101.html (11,564 bytes)

115. Re: [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Orion subreceiver (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:08:30 -0500
Is the reason for the sub par sub receiver due to not having a roofing filter? If not, what is the difference between it and main rx? N4LQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00127.html (10,653 bytes)

116. Re: [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Orion subreceiver (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:46:25 -0500
This may be another opportunity for INRAD. I think their roofing filter for the MP is 75mhz. I ordered one for my Omni VI and it should arrive any day. They are expensive but according to initial tes
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00135.html (10,314 bytes)

117. RE: [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Orion subreceiver (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:25:52 -0500
I would think a switch could take care of that problem. It will automatically switch in/out on the Omni VI by selecting one of the N buttons. Perhaps it could be made to switch out when selecting a n
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00142.html (13,330 bytes)

118. RE: [TenTec] new filter for omni VI (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:12:40 -0500
It's a 600khz roofing filter for cw and a wider one for SSB. The first run is sold out and he says the nest batch won't be ready until at least the end of Feb. Mine was shipped a few days ago and I w
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00152.html (8,607 bytes)

119. Re: [TenTec] omni 6 plus question (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:10:07 -0500
Totally wrong. The 6.3mhz 2.8 goes in the 2.4 slot and the 9mhz 2.8 replaces the stock 2.4 filter. They do not go in the 250hz and N slots. N4LQ. If I were home and had the book in front of me I woul
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00159.html (8,307 bytes)

120. [TenTec] Adding the 2.8khz filters to Omni VI (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:00:43 -0500
1. With rig facing you, turn it over. 2. Remove bottom cover. 3. remove bottom shield. 4. On the left rear you have 2 optional filter slots. Don't use those. 5. There is a filter on the far left (non
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00168.html (7,465 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu