Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4lq@iglou.com: 866 ]

Total 866 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] RE: slide rule dial- how to use? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:48:15 -0500
I remember the complex procedure when I was a novice and used an old NC-100 receiver. 1. Turn tuning until you hear hams. 2. Call CQ there. Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "Paul - W8KC" <w8kc
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00174.html (11,674 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] RE 28.634 & space aliens (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:04:54 -0500
Yea and I bet you're one of em'. You're not foolin me. I mean anyone knows the aliens would chose a frequency that would be a harmonic of something just so they could plant doubt in our minds. Yea...
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00194.html (14,419 bytes)

123. RE: [TenTec] RE: slide rule dial- how to use? (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:34:02 -0500
Yea but that was back in 1964 before the VE's took over the CW bands. N4LQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00209.html (8,997 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter help (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:36:15 -0500
Think back. Maybe you changed something lately? Most likely it's RFI getting into your audio. Fine another rig to monitor yourself. Change from your antenna to a dummy load and see if the audio clear
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00231.html (8,172 bytes)

125. Re: [TenTec] 2.8khz and Carrier Balance??? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:41:45 -0500
Would someone please explain to me what changing the filter from 2.4khz to 2.8khz has to do with carrier balance. I see no relation. The carrier is nulled by balancing the dc voltage on U4 of the TX
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00232.html (9,471 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] 2.8khz and Carrier Balance??? (LONG!!!) (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:28:06 -0500
Well I understand the need to adjust the carrier null but what I do not understand is the recent claims that somehow the 2.8khz filter has something to do with getting the carrier null out of adjustm
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00238.html (17,593 bytes)

127. [TenTec] Wanted: 219 filter FS: 216 filter (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:04:14 -0500
I am looking for another 250hz, 9mhz model 219 filter. I also have the RTTY/Digital filter for sale. This is the model 216 which has a 500hz BW and is centered on 9.002210mhz for proper RTTY offset.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00261.html (6,767 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion again (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:41:27 -0500
Wow this is an oldie. The Omni VI was model 563. The Omni VI+ was model 564. Putting option 3 on a 563 makes it act just like a 564 but it is still a 563 with option 3 upgrade. Pretend that the only
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00288.html (10,567 bytes)

129. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:40:06 -0500
Well sort of...There's lots of little things TenTec did when they came out with the 564, VI+. For example. The option caused some birdies. They cut cable 34 between the logic board and 9mhz IF and in
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00295.html (10,745 bytes)

130. Re: [TenTec] List of Ten Tec instruments (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 20:33:46 -0500
Clive. Don't dispose of that good stuff. Sell it! Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "CLIVE COLLINS" <dartaviation@btopenworld.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com>; <dartaviation@btopenworld.com> Se
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00299.html (8,174 bytes)

131. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:49:01 -0500
I've got 2 OMNI VI option 3's and neither has any VI+ badge on them. I think the decals mentioned came with the Option 1 or 2 upgrade which was intended to be performed by the user. It included stick
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00309.html (12,770 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion & Birdies? (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:55:49 -0500
Maybe TenTec could help you there Deni. I know at some point, TenTec added a screw to the back center area of the bottom aluminum shield. I see bypass capacitors installed in various locations. Proba
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00310.html (9,683 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Non-Confusion (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:25:57 -0500
John: Where did that relay that grounds the RX ant. input come from? Is it a little reed relay? Steve
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00315.html (8,699 bytes)

134. [TenTec] TenTec virus? (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:16:51 -0500
I keep getting email from what appears to be TenTec but of course it is not and there is an attachment which of course I will not open. Has anyone else been seeing these? Steve N4LQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00317.html (7,159 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] Orion Filters ? (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:27:01 -0500
Roofing filters are on top. If they were on the bottom they would be basement filters. N4LQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00326.html (7,899 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:33:21 -0500
There must be an easier way!
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00327.html (9,587 bytes)

137. Re: [TenTec] WTB: Omni 6+ (564) (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:25:52 -0500
I'm curious why you would put the 2.8khz filter in the N2 slot? I assume you wanted to retain the stock 2.4khz transmit bandwidth while receiving at 2.8khz? Am I on track? N4LQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00336.html (8,483 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] Orion record (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:28:46 -0500
Yea. I saw it this morning on QRZ. Saw it on Eham.net 2 days ago.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00348.html (10,338 bytes)

139. [TenTec] Omni VI roofing filter JPG (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:37:56 -0500
Here is the completed installation of the INRAD roofing filter. It mounts on the final amp box toward the rear, bottom of the rig. Take a look. Oh, It works too. I noticed no loss of gain or increase
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00354.html (8,096 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI roofing filter JPG (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:09:21 -0500
Be prepared to spend about $200. Small price to pay for an Omni VI+ +. You get to choose either the SSB or CW roofing filter. The CW filter is 600hz wide. With the programing switches, you can make i
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00359.html (10,576 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu