Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4lq@iglou.com: 866 ]

Total 866 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI product detector IMD (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:54:26 -0500
Mike I think I can locate the SL6440. Do you have the instructions for building the G4PKT prod det? Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "Michael, Dana A" <dana.michael@tycoelectronics.com> To: <t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00681.html (11,837 bytes)

162. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:14:59 -0500
The fastest way to dispel those false rumors is come out with an update. I would like to see the audio output stay a bit more constant with varying signal levels. Weak sigs require a big AF gain boos
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00701.html (14,141 bytes)

163. Re: [TenTec]General 2nd order questions??? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:42:35 -0500
Bill etc. I can make little sense of the ARRL's test. For the VI+, they state the signals can be either S9 or S9+40db. Then they show a chart but don't reveal which input level they used. They mentio
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00708.html (14,369 bytes)

164. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:29:15 -0500
This whole topic is weird. First, there must be a limit to what the Jupiter is capable of. After a few firmware bugs are snuffed out, what is there left to do? You can't keep upgrading a rig forever
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00713.html (12,974 bytes)

165. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter updates (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:05:39 -0500
Of course and the noise reduction can be updated to eliminate BPL interference. Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "ron" <roncasa@verizon.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, January 1
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00717.html (10,668 bytes)

166. [TenTec] FS: 282 and 218 (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:24:45 -0500
$65 each or $100 for both. Shipped USA. Reply direct. No business on reflector. n4lq@iglou.com Steve N4LQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00719.html (6,571 bytes)

167. [TenTec] Re: Fuzzy CW Note (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:57:05 -0500
True. You need to use a narrow filter on the receive end to filter out the fuzz. Then they sound almost normal. I don't believe firmware has much effect on transmitted byproducts. Steve: I am most co
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00722.html (7,475 bytes)

168. Re: [TenTec]General 2nd order questions (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:04:41 -0500
Ok ...So what do you call these products? If you have the bandpass open to 2khz and you hear 2 carriers about 500hz apart and they beat together, producing a 500hz tone. What is that? Is this occurri
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00723.html (11,332 bytes)

169. Re: [TenTec] General 2nd order questions (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:18:35 -0500
True but when dealing with steady state signals as in the ARRL lab test, I don't see that "clipping" enters into the picture. Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "Lee Crocker" <w9oy@yahoo.com> To
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00732.html (8,374 bytes)

170. [TenTec] 282 sold (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:15:56 -0500
Steve N4LQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00736.html (6,358 bytes)

171. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:23:26 -0500
Joe: We are just TenTec owners and users. We have no way of knowing what TT will do. You need to contact them. I'm sure they will tell you that they intend to support the Pegasus however it is a matu
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00762.html (8,237 bytes)

172. Re: [TenTec] Orion reset (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:12:21 -0500
John: thanks for the info on those ferrites. I just ordered a bag. Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "Robert Carroll" <rlcarroll@patmedia.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, January
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00768.html (8,093 bytes)

173. Re: [TenTec] Need 962 P/S info (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:32:32 -0500
Yes and if you are going to use it to power another rig you need to somehow short together the 2 white wires otherwise the ps will not turn on. So....Red=+ Black=-, white wires go to on-off switch in
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00771.html (9,156 bytes)

174. Re: [TenTec] Orion reset (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:05:37 -0500
Where are you John? Your callsign? Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "John Webb" <w5jmw@cableone.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 7:25 PM Subject: Re: [TenTec] O
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00775.html (10,173 bytes)

175. Re: [TenTec] Orion reset (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:08:28 -0500
Well speaking of Mysteries, Why would the Mystery antenna be quieter than a Carolina Windom? What part of the Windom was making noise? N4LQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00791.html (17,515 bytes)

176. Re: [TenTec] Orion reset (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:13:35 -0500
I was going to suggest that John go to a dealer and try out that PROIII but from his qth to Texas Towers it looks like 375 miles. I also see where John is a cw op so he might want to read my review o
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00792.html (13,037 bytes)

177. Re: [TenTec] Orion reset (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:19:11 -0500
I'll just bet it's the extra DB loss in the coax making it seem quiet.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00797.html (20,718 bytes)

178. Re: [TenTec] Orion reset (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:19:19 -0500
Toby I believe it is a well established fact that your Orion is flawless. Let us all hope it continues to serve you well. Steve
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00805.html (16,156 bytes)

179. Re: [TenTec] ORION and MixW software slow operation problem? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:23:38 -0500
You are going to have to use the process of elimination. First eliminate the big things like rig, computer, software one at a time. You can start by downloading one of several programs that do simila
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00814.html (10,804 bytes)

180. Re: [TenTec] 301 Remote tuning knob (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:28:40 -0500
Why exaust yoursef Jerry? Just call TT and order a new encoder. I did recently and they are cheap. You will need to saw the shaft to length. N4LQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00837.html (7,722 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu